Faculty Response to Library Technology: Insights on Attitudes

ACADF MIC LIBRARIESHAVP MADE A sI(:NIFIc:Awr investment in electronic information resources and associated computer-based technologies so that their users can gain access to those resources and services. The faculty response to the increase in these library technologies is not always known. Using an essential element from the theory of the diffusion of innovations (that individuals adopt innovations at different rates), the authors conducted a series of focus group sessions and personal interviews with university faculty to discover their attitudes regarding the computer-based information resources that academic libraries provide to meet their information needs. This article explores the differences between the level of adoption of information resources by selected faculty and their responses to these technologies, the impact of library technology on the way they use the library for research and teaching, and their interpretation of the role the library plays in this period of transition and change.

[1]  Eileen G. Abels,et al.  Factors That Influence the Use of Electronic Networks by Science and Engineering Faculty at Small Institutions. Part I. Queries , 1996, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[2]  Judith A. Adams,et al.  Electronic Information Technologies and Resources: Use by University Faculty and Faculty Preferences for Related Library Services , 1995 .

[3]  F. Kerlinger,et al.  Foundations of behavioral research / Fred N. Kerlinger , 1973 .

[4]  Barbara Valentine,et al.  Undergraduate research behavior: Using focus groups to generate theory , 1993 .

[5]  Rowena Cullen,et al.  Technology and Management in Library and Information Services , 1997 .

[6]  Sara Fine.  Technological Innovation, Diffusion, and Resistance: An Historical Perspective. , 1986 .

[7]  Susan E. Searing,et al.  Online Catalogs from the Users' Perspective: The Use of Focus Group Interviews. , 1997 .

[8]  Ellen Meltzer,et al.  Undergraduate in Focus: Can Student Input Lead to New Directions in Planning Undergraduate Library Services , 1995, Libr. Trends.

[9]  K. Krippendorff.  Krippendorff, Klaus, Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology . Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1980. , 1980 .

[10]  Jane Klobas.  So why do people use online? An investigation of discretionary use of electronic information resources , 1993 .

[11]  Virginia Massey-Burzio,et al.  From the other side of the reference desk: A focus group study , 1998 .

[12]  Michael G. Morris,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Theories and Models , 1996 .

[13]  Lynn Silipigni Connaway.  Focus Group Interviews: A Data Collection Methodology. , 1996 .

[14]  Audrey F. Bancroft,et al.  A forward-looking library use survey: WSU libraries in the 21st century , 1998 .

[15]  Stephen Lehmann,et al.  Humanists and Electronic Information Services: Acceptance and Resistance. , 1991 .

[16]  Jose-Marie Griffiths.  Diffusion of Innovations in Library and Information Science. Final Report. , 1986 .

[17]  Gertrude Himmelfarb.  Revolution in the Library , 1999, Libr. Trends.

[18]  Joan B. Fiscella,et al.  An Approach To Assessing Faculty Use of Locally Loaded Databases , 1995 .

[19]  Richard Widdows,et al.  The Focus Group Interview: A Method for Assessing Users' Evaluation of Library Service , 1991 .

[20]  Lynn Westbrook,et al.  Qualitative Research Methods: A Review of Major Stages, Data Analysis Techniques, and Quality Controls. , 1994 .

[21]  Patricia Fravel Vander Meer,et al.  The connection between library use and use of campus computer applications , 1996 .

[22]  R. Fidel.  Qualitative methods in information retrieval research. , 1993 .

[23]  Eileen G. Abels,et al.  Factors that influence the use of electronic networks by science and engineering faculty at small institutions: part I: queries , 1996 .

[24]  KLAUS MUSMANN,et al.  The Diffusion of Innovations In Libraries. A Review of the Literature on Organization Theory and Diffusion Research , 1982 .

[25]  Bryce Allen,et al.  Content Analysis in Library and Information Science Research. , 1990 .

[26]  Julie M. Hurd,et al.  From Print to Electronic: The Adoption of Information Technology by Academic Chemists. , 1998 .

[27]  Jane E. Klobas,et al.  Beyond information quality: fitness for purpose and electronic information resource use , 1995, J. Inf. Sci..

[28]  Steve Gilbert.  An “Online” Experience: Discussion group debates why faculty use or resist technology , 1995 .