Prediction of and differences in computer use: universal adoption of notebook computers at three undergraduate institutions

The universal availability of computers through the adoption of notebook computers for faculty by the University is an organizational answer to the adoption of computer technology by faculty. The researcher studied solutions to this problem through a survey of faculty at three undergraduate institutions that adopted notebook computers for their faculty and students. Participants completed a Computer Technology in Teaching (CTIT) questionnaire composed of the above measures as well as demographic and computer-related questions. Faculty received the questionnaire prior to the adoption of notebook computers on three undergraduate campuses. The faculty received the same questionnaire one year later. Dviring the interim between the questionnaires, the three campuses adopted notebook computers for all faculty. One of the campuses also adopted notebooks for all students. In the first phase of the study the dependent variable, Level of Computer Use, was determined using responses to the second questionnaire. The independent variables: age, academic rank, innovativeness and subjective norms, were drawn firom responses to the first questionnaire. Two variables— Subjective Norms and Innovativeness—were significant predictors of the faculty's levels of computer use. The last variable, academic rank and age, did not add to the predictive value beyond that indicated by Subjective Norms and Innovative Scale.

[1]  Richard A. Krueger,et al.  Analyzing and Reporting Focus Group Results , 1997 .

[2]  D. Morgan The Focus Group Guidebook , 1997 .

[3]  Henryk R. Marcinkiewicz,et al.  Using Subjective Norms To Predict Teachers' Computer Use , 1996 .

[4]  Henryk R. Marcinkiewicz,et al.  From Preservice to Practice: A Longitudinal Study of Teachers and Computer Use , 1995 .

[5]  Margaret Crawford The role of the school library media specialist in distance education , 1995 .

[6]  R. Clark Media will never influence learning , 1994 .

[7]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Learningwith media: Restructuring the debate , 1994 .

[8]  R. Kozma Will media influence learning? Reframing the debate , 1994 .

[9]  Janice Miller Stuhlmann,et al.  Circumstances and Experiences That Lead to Incorporating Telecommunications into Teaching Practices. , 1994 .

[10]  Henry Jay Becker,et al.  How Exemplary Computer-Using Teachers Differ From Other Teachers: Implications for Realizing the Po , 1994 .

[11]  Kenneth C. Green,et al.  Campus Computing 1993. The USC National Survey of Desktop Computing in Higher Education. , 1994 .

[12]  Henryk R. Marcinkiewicz Computers and Teachers: Factors Influencing Computer Use in the Classroom , 1993 .

[13]  Michael Simonson,et al.  The Reduction of Computer Anxiety , 1993 .

[14]  Gerald W. Bracey Exemplary Computer Use , 1993 .

[15]  K. Sheingold,et al.  Commonalities and Distinctive Patterns in Teachers' Integration of Computers , 1993, American Journal of Education.

[16]  Henry Jay Becker,et al.  Teaching with and about computers in secondary schools , 1993, CACM.

[17]  J. Gardner,et al.  The Impact of High Access to Computers on Learning , 1993 .

[18]  L. McKay Overcoming resistance to change. , 1993, Canadian journal of nursing administration.

[19]  Henryk R. Marcinkiewicz,et al.  Procedures for Assessing Teachers' Computer Use Based on Instructional Transformation. , 1993 .

[20]  P. A. Cohen,et al.  A survey of instructional technology in dental education. , 1992, Journal of dental education.

[21]  Stephen T. Kerr,et al.  A model for integrating computer-based technologies in teacher education , 1992 .

[22]  Jo Arnold Frame,et al.  Moving toward a staff development model for computer learning , 1991 .

[23]  Karen Sheingold,et al.  Accomplished Teachers: Integrating Computers into Classroom Practice. , 1990 .

[24]  Larry J. Stephens,et al.  Factors affecting computer anxiety in high school computer science students , 1989 .

[25]  Stephen R. Hawk,et al.  Locus of Control and Computer Attitude: The Effect of User Involvement , 1989 .

[26]  E. Rogers,et al.  Innovations and Organizations , 1988 .

[27]  M D. Roblyer,et al.  The Effectiveness of Microcomputers in Education: A Review of the Research from 1980-1987 , 1988 .

[28]  A. Koohang A study of the attitudes of pre-service teachers toward the use of computers , 1987 .

[29]  Shirley M. Hord,et al.  Taking Charge of Change , 1987 .

[30]  Michael R. Simonson,et al.  Development of a Standardized Test of Computer Literacy and a Computer Anxiety Index , 1987 .

[31]  Henry Jay Becker,et al.  The Impact of Computer Use on Children's Learning: What Research Has Shown and What It Has Not. , 1987 .

[32]  Gary D. Scudder,et al.  Managing innovation and change processes: Findings from the Minnesota innovation research program , 1986 .

[33]  J. D. Eveland,et al.  Diffusion, Technology Transfer, and Implementation , 1986 .

[34]  Ronald E. Goldsmith,et al.  Convergent Validity of Four Innovativeness Scales , 1986 .

[35]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Central problems in the management of innovation , 1986 .

[36]  Hasler Rudy Hayes,et al.  Three problems in teaching general skills , 1985 .

[37]  Paul Jones,et al.  Computer Experience and Computer Anxiety: Two Pilot Studies. , 1985 .

[38]  Clarice P. Gressard,et al.  The Effects of Sex, Age, and Computer Experience on Computer Attitudes. , 1984 .

[39]  R. A. Morano Av use enhances student perception of teaching effectiveness , 1984 .

[40]  Michael Simonson,et al.  Development and Validation of a Measure of Computer Anxiety. , 1984 .

[41]  Gene Hall Viewing evaluation utilization as an innovation , 1982 .

[42]  Stuart M. Keeley,et al.  Asking the Right Questions , 1981 .

[43]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , 1980 .

[44]  H. Hurt,et al.  SCALES FOR THE MEASUREMENT OF INNOVATIVENESS , 1977 .

[45]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[46]  E. Rogers,et al.  Communication in Organizations , 1976 .

[47]  Gene E. Hall,et al.  A Manual for Assessing Open-Ended Statements of Concern About an Innovation. , 1976 .

[48]  J. Rotter Some Problems and Misconceptions Related to the Construct of Internal Versus External Control of Reinforcement , 1975 .

[49]  E. Rogers,et al.  Communication of Innovations; A Cross-Cultural Approach. , 1974 .

[50]  L. Porter,et al.  Communication in Organizations. , 1972 .

[51]  David G. Bowers,et al.  Management by Participation. , 1968 .