FFR-Guided PCI Optimization Directed by High-Definition IVUS Versus Standard of Care: The FFR REACT Trial.

[1]  C. Collet,et al.  Can FFR After Stenting Help Reduce Target Vessel Failure? , 2021, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[2]  C. Berry,et al.  Post-stenting fractional flow reserve vs coronary angiography for optimization of percutaneous coronary intervention (TARGET-FFR) , 2021, European heart journal.

[3]  I. Kardys,et al.  Impact of Poststenting Fractional Flow Reserve on Long-Term Clinical Outcomes , 2021, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.

[4]  P. Serruys,et al.  Long-Term Outcomes After Revascularization for Stable Ischemic Heart Disease , 2020, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.

[5]  N. Tanaka,et al.  Influence of Target Vessel on Prognostic Relevance of Fractional Flow Reserve After Coronary Stenting. , 2019, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[6]  E. Boersma,et al.  Fractional flow reserve guided percutaneous coronary intervention optimization directed by high-definition intravascular ultrasound versus standard of care: Rationale and study design of the prospective randomized FFR-REACT trial. , 2019, American heart journal.

[7]  G. Stone,et al.  Incidence and predictors of target lesion failure in patients undergoing contemporary DES implantation-Individual patient data pooled analysis from 6 randomized controlled trials. , 2019, American heart journal.

[8]  P. Serruys,et al.  Drug-eluting or bare-metal stents for percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials , 2019, The Lancet.

[9]  B. Uretsky,et al.  Prospective Evaluation of the Strategy of Functionally Optimized Coronary Intervention , 2019, Journal of the American Heart Association.

[10]  F. Zijlstra,et al.  Explanation of Postprocedural Fractional Flow Reserve Below 0.85: A Comprehensive Ultrasound Analysis of the FFR SEARCH Registry , 2019, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.

[11]  N. Tanaka,et al.  Prognostic Implications of Relative Increase and Final Fractional Flow Reserve in Patients With Stent Implantation. , 2018, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[12]  Fei Ye,et al.  Intravascular Ultrasound Versus Angiography-Guided Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation: The ULTIMATE Trial. , 2018, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[13]  M. Price,et al.  ACIST-FFR Study (Assessment of Catheter-Based Interrogation and Standard Techniques for Fractional Flow Reserve Measurement) , 2017, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.

[14]  G. Rioufol,et al.  Prognostic Value of Fractional Flow Reserve Measured Immediately After Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation , 2017, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.

[15]  Jun-Jie Zhang,et al.  Cutoff Value and Long-Term Prediction of Clinical Events by FFR Measured Immediately After Implantation of a Drug-Eluting Stent in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: 1- to 3-Year Results From the DKCRUSH VII Registry Study. , 2017, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[16]  G. Knapp,et al.  Impact of impaired fractional flow reserve after coronary interventions on outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2016, BMC Cardiovascular Disorders.

[17]  B. Uretsky,et al.  Utilizing Post-Intervention Fractional Flow Reserve to Optimize Acute Results and the Relationship to Long-Term Outcomes. , 2016, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[18]  I. Elgendy,et al.  Outcomes With Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Stent Implantation: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials in the Era of Drug-Eluting Stents , 2016, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.

[19]  U. Siebert,et al.  Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: 2-year follow-up of the FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) study. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[20]  U. Siebert,et al.  Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention , 2009 .

[21]  U. Siebert,et al.  Coronary Pressure Measurement After Stenting Predicts Adverse Events at Follow-Up: A Multicenter Registry , 2002, Circulation.

[22]  Robert Gray,et al.  A Proportional Hazards Model for the Subdistribution of a Competing Risk , 1999 .

[23]  B. De Bruyne,et al.  Clinical value of post–percutaneous coronary intervention fractional flow reserve value: A systematic review and meta‐analysis , 2017, American heart journal.