Informational Influence in Organizations: An Integrated Approach to Knowledge Adoption

This research investigates how knowledge workers are influenced to adopt the advice that they receive in mediated contexts. The research integrates the Technology Acceptance Model (Davis 1989) with dual-process models of informational influence (e.g., Petty and Cacioppo 1986, Chaiken and Eagly 1976) to build a theoretical model of information adoption. This model highlights the assessment of information usefulness as a mediator of the information adoption process. Importantly, the model draws on the dual-process models to make predictions about the antecedents of informational usefulness under different processing conditions.The model is investigated qualitatively first, using interviews of a sample of 40 consultants, and then quantitatively on another sample of 63 consultants from the same international consulting organization. Data reflect participants' perceptions of actual e-mails they received from colleagues consisting of advice or recommendations. Results support the model, suggesting that the process models used to understand information adoption can be generalized to the field of knowledge management, and thatusefulness serves a mediating role between influence processes and information adoption. Organizational knowledge work is becoming increasingly global. This research offers a model for understanding knowledge transfer using computer-mediated communication.

[1]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[2]  J. Walther.  Interpersonal Effects in Computer-Mediated Interaction , 1992 .

[3]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Communication modality as a determinant of message persuasiveness and message comprehensibility. , 1976 .

[4]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  User participation in knowledge update of expert systems , 1997, Inf. Manag..

[5]  Nicholas J. Belkin,et al.  Understanding Judgment of Information Quality and Cognitive Authority in the WWW , 1998 .

[6]  Helmut Jungermann,et al.  Advice giving and taking , 1999, Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. 1999. HICSS-32. Abstracts and CD-ROM of Full Papers.

[7]  D. R. Shaffer,et al.  Susceptibility to Persuasive Appeals as a Function of Source Credibility and Prior Experience With the Attitude Object , 2004 .

[8]  C. D. Ward,et al.  Better Liked than Right , 1980 .

[9]  J. Jaccard,et al.  Interaction effects in multiple regression , 1992 .

[10]  M. Heesacker,et al.  Field dependence and attitude change: Source credibility can alter persuasion by affecting message-relevant thinking , 1983 .

[11]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Managerial Response to Changing Environments: Perspectives on Problem Sensing from Social Cognition. , 1982 .

[12]  John Short,et al.  The social psychology of telecommunications , 1976 .

[13]  S. Chaiken.  Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. , 1980 .

[14]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Personal involvement as a determinant of argument based persuasion , 1981 .

[15]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  Book review:Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Thomas H. Davenport and Laurence Prusak. Harvard Business School Press, 1998. $29.95US. ISBN 0‐87584‐655‐6 , 1998 .

[16]  Subhash Sharma,et al.  Identification and Analysis of Moderator Variables , 1981 .

[17]  Franziska Marquart,et al.  Communication and persuasion : central and peripheral routes to attitude change , 1988 .

[18]  Michael H. Zack,et al.  Interactivity and Communication Mode Choice in Ongoing Management Groups , 1993, Inf. Syst. Res..

[19]  K. Gergen.  Toward Transformation In Social Knowledge , 1982 .

[20]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies , 2000, Management Science.

[21]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , 1980 .

[22]  Wynne W. Chin.  The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. , 1998 .

[23]  S LeeAllen.  Electronic mail as a medium for rich communication , 1994 .

[24]  S. Ratneshwar,et al.  The Effect of Cultural Orientation on Persuasion , 1997 .

[25]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[26]  I. Nonaka.  A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[27]  R. Rice.  Task Analyzability, Use of New Media, and Effectiveness: A Multi-Site Exploration of Media Richness , 1992 .

[28]  M. Markus.  Electronic Mail as the Medium of Managerial Choice , 1994 .

[29]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[30]  R. Billings,et al.  Use of path analysis in industrial/organizational psychology: Criticisms and suggestions. , 1978 .

[31]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  The Role of Innovation Characteristics and Perceived Voluntariness in the Acceptance of Information Technologies , 1997 .

[32]  James L. McKenney,et al.  Social Context and Interaction in Ongoing Computer-Supported Management Groups , 1995 .

[33]  K. Stamm,et al.  The Relationship of Attitudinal Components to Trust in Media , 1994 .

[34]  Sammy W. Pearson,et al.  Development of a Tool for Measuring and Analyzing Computer User Satisfaction , 1983 .

[35]  Allen S. Lee.  Electronic Mail as a Medium for Rich Communication: An Empirical Investigation Using Hermeneutic Interpretation , 1994, MIS Q..

[36]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  A Partial Least Squares Latent Variable Modeling Approach for Measuring Interaction Effects: Results from a Monte Carlo Simulation Study and Voice Mail Emotion/Adoption Study , 1996, ICIS.

[37]  J. Mowen,et al.  SOURCE CREDIBILITY: ON THE INDEPENDENT EFFECTS OF TRUST AND EXPERTISE , 1986 .

[38]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Testing Media Richness Theory in the New Media: The Effects of Cues, Feedback, and Task Equivocality , 1998, Inf. Syst. Res..

[39]  J. B. Quinn,et al.  Managing professional intellect: making the most of the best. , 1996, Harvard business review.

[40]  Suzanne R. Pallak.  Salience of a Communicator's Physical Attractiveness and Persuasion: A Heuristic Versus Systematic Processing Interpretation , 1983 .

[41]  E RiceRonald.  Task Analyzability, Use of New Media, and Effectiveness , 1992 .

[42]  C. Higgins,et al.  Gender differences in work-family conflict. , 1991 .

[43]  Fischer,et al.  Using Advice and Assessing Its Quality. , 2000, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[44]  Janet A. Sniezek,et al.  Cueing and Cognitive Conflict in Judge-Advisor Decision Making , 1995 .

[45]  C I HOVLAND,et al.  Changes in attitude through communication. , 1951, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[46]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Heuristic processing can bias systematic processing: effects of source credibility, argument ambiguity, and task importance on attitude judgment. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[47]  Stephen Worchel,et al.  Effects of Media, Communicator,and Message Position onAttitude Change , 1978 .

[48]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  A model to assess the behavioral impacts of consultative knowledge based systems , 1997, Inf. Process. Manag..

[49]  Graham K. Rand,et al.  Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences , 1983 .

[50]  A. A. Lumsdaine.  Communication and persuasion , 1954 .

[51]  S. Kiesler,et al.  The kindness of strangers: on the usefulness of electronic weak ties for technical advice , 1996 .

[52]  John C. Mowen,et al.  An Information Integration Analysis of How Trust and Expertise Combine to Influence Source Credibility and Persuasion , 1987 .

[53]  J. Spradley.  The Ethnographic Interview , 1979 .

[54]  M. Sherif,et al.  The psychology of attitudes. , 1946, Psychological review.

[55]  B. Ellis,et al.  The Effects of Uncertainty and Source Credibility on Attitudes about Organizational Change , 1992 .

[56]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[57]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Information Exchange and Use in Group Decision Making: You Can Lead a Group to Information, but You Can't Make It Think , 1996, MIS Q..

[58]  Lee Sproull,et al.  Reducing social context cues: electronic mail in organizational communication , 1986 .

[59]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[60]  Stephen Worchel,et al.  Is the Medium the Message? A Study of the Effects of Media, Communicator, and Message Characteristics on Attitude Change1 , 1975 .

[61]  Jack M. Feldman,et al.  Self-generated validity and other effects of measurement on belief, attitude, intention, and behavior. , 1988 .

[62]  John T. Flint.  Toward Transformation of Social Knowledge , 1997 .

[63]  F. Bookstein,et al.  Two Structural Equation Models: LISREL and PLS Applied to Consumer Exit-Voice Theory , 1982 .

[64]  J. Brown,et al.  Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation , 1991 .

[65]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Information Technology Adoption Across Time: A Cross-Sectional Comparison of Pre-Adoption and Post-Adoption Beliefs , 1999, MIS Q..

[66]  Juliann Koch,et al.  Communicator Attractiveness and Expertise, Emotional Versus Rational Appeals, and Persuasion: A Heuristic Versus Systematic Processing Interpretation , 1983 .