Safety incentive and penalty provisions in Indian construction projects and their impact on safety performance

Safety incentive and penalty (I/P) provisions in construction contracts are one of the most common forms of I/P. Contradictory opinions on the effectiveness of these provisions have been expressed in the literature. Statistics on safety provisions were collected from 32 construction projects, which include both types of contracts – those with safety I/P provisions and those without them. Although inclusion of safety I/P provisions in contracts helps in improving the overall safety performance in construction projects, further scope for improvement still exists. Literature review and structured personal interviews, coupled with a survey based on preliminary questionnaire, revealed that successful formulation and implementation of such provisions are dependent on 25 attributes which need the attention of both clients and contractors. A questionnaire-based survey was conducted to evaluate these attributes. The six factors extracted by carrying out factor analysis are: incentive distribution method, proper labour training, special attention to risky situations, role of safety committee and sub-contractors, specialised works and safety equipments, and right form of I/P. If taken care of, these attributes have the potential to improve the safety performance in construction projects. The results would be useful to clients and contractors in implementing the safety I/P provisions and thereby improving safety performance.

[1]  Patrick T.I. Lam,et al.  Empirical Study of the Risks and Difficulties in Implementing Guaranteed Maximum Price and Target Cost Contracts in Construction , 2010 .

[2]  Vacharapoom Benjaoran,et al.  An integrated safety management with construction management using 4D CAD model , 2010 .

[3]  A. H. Blyth Design of Incentive Contracts, Basic Principles , 1969 .

[4]  Mei-yung Leung,et al.  Preventing construction worker injury incidents through the management of personal stress and organizational stressors. , 2012, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[5]  Denise Bower,et al.  INCENTIVE MECHANISMS FOR PROJECT SUCCESS , 2002 .

[6]  N. L. Johnson,et al.  Multivariate Analysis , 1958, Nature.

[7]  David B. Ashley,et al.  Impact of Various Construction Contract Clauses , 1987 .

[8]  Mohan M. Kumaraswamy,et al.  Relational Contracting and Teambuilding: Assessing Potential Contractual and Noncontractual Incentives , 2008 .

[9]  J. Overall,et al.  Applied multivariate analysis , 1983 .

[10]  Florence Yean Yng Ling,et al.  Framework for project managers to manage construction safety , 2005 .

[11]  V. K. Bansal,et al.  Application of geographic information systems in construction safety planning , 2011 .

[12]  Victor Y. Haines,et al.  Understanding reactions to safety incentives , 2001 .

[13]  A. Kadefors Trust in project relationships-inside the black box , 2004 .

[14]  J. Hinze Safety Incentives: Do They Reduce Injuries? , 2002 .

[15]  Min Liu,et al.  A comparative study on adopting human resource practices for safety management on construction projects in the United States and Singapore , 2011 .

[16]  Bryan Nolan Data Analysis: An Introduction , 1994 .

[17]  K. N. Jha,et al.  Factors affecting cost performance: evidence from Indian construction projects , 2005 .

[18]  C. William Ibbs,et al.  OWNER-FURNISHED EQUIPMENT (OFE) CONTRACT PRACTICES , 1987 .

[19]  Kumar Neeraj Jha Construction Project Management: Theory and Practice , 2015 .

[20]  John A. Gambatese,et al.  Factors That Influence Safety Performance of Specialty Contractors , 2003 .

[21]  Jimmie Hinze,et al.  Costs of Construction Injuries , 1991 .