Assessing arm and hand function after stroke: a validity test of the hierarchical scoring system used in the motor assessment scale for stroke.

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the validity of the scoring hierarchy for the 3 upper-limb items on the Motor Assessment Scale (MAS). DESIGN Application of Rasch analysis to 3 independent measurement scales, each representing the upper-arm function, hand movements, and advanced hand activities items of the MAS. SETTING Inpatient and outpatient occupational therapy (OT) programs in a department of rehabilitation of an urban hospital center. PARTICIPANTS One hundred patients (67 men, 33 women; average age, 54.3+/-14.4 y; average time since stroke onset, 104 d) attending OT for stroke rehabilitation. INTERVENTIONS Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE The MAS for stroke (upper-arm function, hand movements, and advanced hand activities sections). RESULTS Rasch analysis provided support for the validity of hierarchical scoring criteria for the upper-arm scale. This analysis, however, identified inconsistencies in the hierarchical scoring criteria for the hand function and advanced hand activities scales and, when considering measurement error, only small differences in difficulty level between several behavioral criteria. CONCLUSIONS The findings lead to suggestions for changes in the behavioral criteria hierarchy for upper-limb items on the MAS and highlight the importance of using statistical analyses to test the validity of proposed hierarchies of behavioral criteria in functional assessments.

[1]  Marjorie H. Woollacott,et al.  Motor Control: Theory and Practical Applications , 1995 .

[2]  W. Fisher,et al.  Applying psychometric criteria to functional assessment in medical rehabilitation: II. Defining interval measures. , 1992, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[3]  Ching-Lin Hsieh,et al.  Responsiveness of two upper extremity function instruments for stroke inpatients receiving rehabilitation , 2002, Clinical rehabilitation.

[4]  S. Kreiner,et al.  Rasch analysis in the development of a rating scale for assessment of mobility after stroke , 1995, Acta neurologica Scandinavica.

[5]  L. Ada,et al.  A kinematic analysis of recovery of the ability to stand up following stroke. , 1992, The Australian journal of physiotherapy.

[6]  I. Hsueh,et al.  Inter-rater reliability and validity of the action research arm test in stroke patients. , 1998, Age and ageing.

[7]  Subashan Perera,et al.  Rasch analysis of a new stroke-specific outcome scale: the Stroke Impact Scale. , 2003, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[8]  C. Trombly,et al.  Effects of task goal on movement kinematics and line bisection performance in adults without disabilities. , 1998, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[9]  Motor Assessment Scale for Stroke Patients , 1988 .

[10]  J. Carr,et al.  Neurological Rehabilitation: Optimizing Motor Performance , 2003 .

[11]  J. Carr,et al.  Evaluation of a home-based exercise and training programme to improve sit-to-stand in patients with chronic stroke , 2002, Clinical rehabilitation.

[12]  J. Carr,et al.  Investigation of a new motor assessment scale for stroke patients. , 1985, Physical therapy.

[13]  G. Müller,et al.  [Movement therapy in hemiplegia]. , 1977, Beitrage zur Orthopadie und Traumatologie.

[14]  B. Wright Reasonable mean-square fit values , 1994 .

[15]  David Andrich,et al.  Rasch Models For Measurement , 1988 .

[16]  J. Poole,et al.  Motor assessment scale for stroke patients: concurrent validity and interrater reliability. , 1988, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[17]  L. Tickle-Degnen,et al.  A kinematic study of contextual effects on reaching performance in persons with and without stroke: influences of object availability. , 2000, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[18]  B. Langhammer,et al.  Bobath or Motor Relearning Programme? A comparison of two different approaches of physiotherapy in stroke rehabilitation: a randomized controlled study , 2000, Clinical rehabilitation.

[19]  Rasch analysis of the Rivermead Mobility Index: a study using mobility measures of first-stroke inpatients. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[20]  C. A. Trombly,et al.  Occupational Therapy for Physical Dysfunction , 1989 .

[21]  T. Twitchell The restoration of motor function following hemiplegia in man. , 1951, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[22]  P. Duncan,et al.  Post-Stroke Rehabilitation , 2004 .

[23]  A. Heinemann,et al.  Measurement Properties of the Galveston Orientation and Amnesia Test (GOAT) and Improvement Patterns During Inpatient Rehabilitation , 2000, The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation.

[24]  T. Tsuji,et al.  The stroke impairment assessment set: its internal consistency and predictive validity. , 2000, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[25]  N. A. Bernshteĭn The co-ordination and regulation of movements , 1967 .

[26]  R. Adams,et al.  A dose-response relationship between amount of weight-bearing exercise and walking outcome following cerebrovascular accident. , 1994, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[27]  J. Bernhardt,et al.  Changes in balance and locomotion measures during rehabilitation following stroke. , 1998, Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy.

[28]  L. Tickle-Degnen,et al.  Effects of object affordances on reaching performance in persons with and without cerebrovascular accident. , 1998, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[29]  F. Mackey,et al.  Motor assessment scale scores as a measure of rehabilitation outcome following stroke. , 1992, The Australian journal of physiotherapy.

[30]  L. Tesio,et al.  A short measure of balance in multiple sclerosis: validation through Rasch analysis. , 1997, Functional neurology.

[31]  F. Malouin,et al.  Evaluating motor recovery early after stroke: comparison of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment and the Motor Assessment Scale. , 1994, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[32]  J. Bean,et al.  High intensity strength training improves strength and functional performance after stroke. , 2000, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[33]  J. Lai,et al.  The use of Rasch analysis to produce scale-free measurement of functional ability. , 1999, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[34]  A. Fugl-Meyer,et al.  The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. , 1975, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[35]  G. Thickbroom,et al.  Motor outcome after subcortical stroke correlates with the degree of cortical reorganization , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[36]  N. Lannin Reliability, validity and factor structure of the upper limb subscale of the Motor Assessment Scale (UL-MAS) in adults following stroke , 2004, Disability and rehabilitation.

[37]  Birgitta Langhammer,et al.  Bobath or Motor Relearning Programme? A follow-up one and four years post stroke , 2003, Clinical rehabilitation.

[38]  C MacKnight,et al.  Rasch analysis of the hierarchical assessment of balance and mobility (HABAM). , 2000, Journal of clinical epidemiology.