Standardizing knowledge: a dialective view on architectural knowledge and its managers

Many organizations within the construction industry are currently developing standardized practices. Increased standardization involves new ways of organizing construction projects, changing interrelations between professional groups, setting a new culture, i.e. challenging the institutionalized way of being. It, for instance, leads to a concentration of key knowledge into specific knowledge networks and artifacts. This in turn creates new and/or strengthened roles of expertise within the organizations leading to a reallocation of knowledge, as well as power, from the project setting to centrally organized functions, specialist consultancies and knowledge networks. Based on a case study of one Architect Company, this paper examines the tensions and paradoxes inherent in these ‘new’ roles. In the study, 13 persons were interviewed; actors responsible for changing practices, developing tools and ensuring learning among employees. The study contributes to theory building within a research field that examines the emergence of new roles and practices in construction and the contradictions which arise leading to tensions and possible conflict. Many of the assumptions that underlie these new practices run counter to the established norms and local practices as well as to construction practitioners’ ‘intuitions’.

[1]  J. Kenneth Benson,et al.  Organizations: A Dialectical View. , 1977 .

[2]  E. Foldy Dueling Schemata , 2006 .

[3]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing , 2002, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[4]  Monica Lindgren,et al.  Performing arts and the art of performing – On co-construction of project work and professional identities in theatres , 2007 .

[5]  Andrew R.J. Dainty,et al.  Perspectives of UK housebuilders on the use of offsite modern methods of construction , 2007 .

[6]  V. Omanović Diversity and its management as a dialectical process: Encountering Sweden and the U.S. , 2009 .

[7]  Rajat Roy,et al.  Documentation, standardization and improvement of the construction process in house building , 2005 .

[8]  Anders Ekholm,et al.  Design with architectural objects in industrialised house-building , 2009 .

[9]  Lars Stehn,et al.  Applicability of lean principles and practices in industrialized housing production , 2008 .

[10]  Kristian Kreiner In search of relevance: Project management in drifting environments , 1995 .

[11]  Pernilla Gluch,et al.  Unfolding roles and identities of professionals in construction projects: exploring the informality of practices , 2009 .

[12]  Alexander Styhre,et al.  Managing Knowledge in the Construction Industry , 2009 .

[13]  Helena Johnsson,et al.  Information management in industrial housing design and manufacture , 2009, J. Inf. Technol. Constr..

[14]  Davide Nicolini,et al.  Learning In a Constellation of Interconnected Practices: Canon or Dissonance? , 2002 .

[15]  Lauri Koskela,et al.  An exploration towards a production theory and its application to construction , 2000 .

[16]  L. Stehn,et al.  Towards improving client-contractor communication in industrialised building , 2009 .

[17]  Alexander Styhre,et al.  Managing knowledge in platforms: boundary objects and stocks and flows of knowledge , 2010 .

[18]  Scott Fernie,et al.  Knowledge Sharing: Context, Controversy and Confusion , 2003 .

[19]  W. Creed,et al.  Institutional Contradictions, Praxis, and Institutional Change: A Dialectical Perspective , 2002 .

[20]  John Meiling,et al.  Defects in offsite construction: timber module prefabrication , 2009 .

[21]  Lars Stehn,et al.  Competitive impact of industrialised building : in search for explanations to the current state , 2009 .