Bridging the Digital Divide : How Enterprise Ownership and Foreign Competition Affect Internet Access in Eastern Europe and Central Asia

Many observers attributed the rapid productivity growth observed in the United States in the mid- to late 1990s, to the growing use of information, and the Internet. This in turn created concern that developing, and transition economies - where use of information technology, and the Internet was less widespread - would be left behind as productivity, and growth accelerated in technologically advanced countries, and stagnated elsewhere. Using enterprise-level data from twelve transition economies, the author looks at factors that affect whether enterprises in these countries are connected to the Internet. He finds that foreign-owned enterprises are more likely to have Internet access than other enterprises. And that employee-owned enterprises are less likely to have access. Even after controlling for other factors that might affect Internet connectivity, the quality of a country's telecommunications infrastructure appears to have a significant effect on the likelihood that an enterprise in that country has Internet access. Reducing corruption, and taking other steps to improve the business environment, would benefit domestic economies, even if Internet access had little short-term impact on productivity, or growth.

[1]  Simeon Djankov The Determinants of Enterprise Restructuring in Transition: An Assessment of the Evidence , 2000 .

[2]  P. Mauro Corruption and Growth , 1995 .

[3]  S. Wei,et al.  How Taxing is Corruption on International Investors? , 1997, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[4]  E. Wolff,et al.  Multinational Corporations and Productivity Convergence in Mexico , 1989 .

[5]  Stephen D. Oliner,et al.  The Resurgence of Growth in the Late 1990s: Is Information Technology the Story? , 2000 .

[6]  Mona Haddad,et al.  Are there positive spillovers from direct foreign investment?: Evidence from panel data for Morocco , 1993 .

[7]  Magnus Blomstrom,et al.  Technology Transfer and Spillovers? Does Local Participation with Multinationals Matter? , 1998 .

[8]  E. Brynjolfsson,et al.  Beyond Computation: Information Technology, Organizational Transformation and Business Performance , 2000 .

[9]  Roman Frydman,et al.  When Does Privatization Work? The Impact of Private Ownership on Corporate Performance in the Transition Economies , 1999 .

[10]  Håkan Persson,et al.  Foreign investment and spillover efficiency in an underdeveloped economy: Evidence from the Mexican manufacturing industry , 1983 .

[11]  J. Nugent,et al.  Host country reforms and FDI inflows: How much difference do they make? , 1998 .

[12]  Stephen C. Smith,et al.  Privatization Incidence, Ownership Forms, and Firm Performance: Evidence from Slovenia☆☆☆ , 1997 .

[13]  Kamal Saggi,et al.  Trade , Foreign Direct Investment , and International Technology Transfer : A Survey * , 2000 .

[14]  Simeon Djankov,et al.  Foreign Investment and Productivity Growth in Czech Enterprises , 1999 .

[15]  Magnus Blomstrom FOREIGN INVESTMENT AND PRODUCTIVE EFFICIENCY: THE CASE OF MEXICO* , 1986 .

[16]  Daniel Kaufmann,et al.  Measuring governance and state capture: the role of bureaucrats and firms in shaping the business environment , 2000 .

[17]  Simeon Djankov,et al.  Enterprise Restructuring in Transition: A Quantitative Survey , 2002 .

[18]  R. Caves Multinational Firms, Competition, and Productivity in Host-Country Markets , 1974 .

[19]  Ann E. Harrison,et al.  Do Domestic Firms Benefit from Direct Foreign Investment? Evidence from Venezuela , 1999 .

[20]  David G. Tarr,et al.  International Knowledge Flows and Economic Performance: A Review of the Evidence , 2000 .

[21]  A. Kokko,et al.  The Impact of Foreign Investment on Host Countries : A Review of the Empirical Evidence , 1996 .

[22]  S. Globerman Foreign Direct Investment and `Spillover' Efficiency Benefits in Canadian Manufacturing Industries. , 1979 .