Visual processing during mathematical problem solving

This study investigated, in the context of mathematical problem solving by secondary school students, the nature of the visual schemata which Johnson (1987) hypothesises mediate between logical propositional structures and “rich” specific visual images. Four groups of grade 10 students were studied, representing all combinations of high and low operational ability in mathematics (equivalent to Johnson's logical propositional structures) and high and low vividness of visual imagery (corresponding to Johnson's “rich” images). The results suggested first, that success at problem solving was related to logical operational ability, but not to vividness of visual imagery. Second, a variety of visually based strategies were used during problem solving which differed in their level of generality and abstraction, and use of these strategies appeared related to either logical operational ability or vividness of visual imagery, depending on their level of abstraction. The results supported Presmeg's (1992b) continuum of abstraction of image schemata.

[1]  David W. Carraher,et al.  Mathematics in the streets and in schools , 1985 .

[2]  L. Resnick.  The 1987 Presidential Address Learning In School and Out , 1987 .

[3]  Barbara Moses,et al.  Visualization: A Different Approach to Problem Solving. , 1982 .

[4]  Bonnie B. Armbruster.  Metacognition in Creativity , 1989 .

[5]  Mark L. Johnson.  The body in the mind: the bodily basis of meaning , 1987 .

[6]  Margaret Brown,et al.  A Study of Concrete and Formal Operations in School Mathematics: A Piagetian Viewpoint , 1976 .

[7]  N. Presmeg.  The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination and reason , 1992 .

[8]  J. Hadamard,et al.  The Psychology of Invention in the Mathematical Field. , 1945 .

[9]  P. Sheehan,et al.  A shortened form of Betts' questionnaire upon mental imagery. , 1967, Journal of clinical psychology.

[10]  Norma C. Presmeg,et al.  Visualisation and mathematical giftedness , 1986 .

[11]  S. Scribner.  Studying working intelligence. , 1984 .

[12]  Grayson H. Wheatley.  Enhancing Mathematics Learning through Imagery. , 1991 .

[13]  L E Walkup.  Creativity in Science through Visualization , 1965, Perceptual and motor skills.

[14]  J. Biggs,et al.  Multimodal Learning and the Quality of Intelligent Behavior , 1991 .

[15]  Vadim Andreevich Krutet︠s︡kiĭ.  The Psychology of Mathematical Abilities in Schoolchildren , 1976 .

[16]  A. Bishop.  Review of Research on Visualization in Mathematics Education. , 1989 .

[17]  Norma C. Presmeg,et al.  Visualisation in High School Mathematics. , 1986 .

[18]  Norma C. Presmeg,et al.  Prototypes, metaphors, metonymies and imaginative rationality in high school mathematics , 1992 .

[19]  J. Lave.  Cognition in Practice: Outdoors: a social anthropology of cognition in practice , 1988 .

[20]  Jane Watson.  Multimodal functioning in understanding fractions , 1993 .

[21]  J. Bruner.  The course of cognitive growth. , 1964 .

[22]  J. Hadamard,et al.  The Psychology of Invention in the Mathematical Field. , 1945 .

[23]  Robert B. Davis.  Learning Mathematics: The Cognitive Science Approach to Mathematics Education , 1984 .