Surgical Practice Parameters for the Definitive Management of Sacrococcygeal Pilonidal Sinus Disease: Surgeons’ Perspective

Background Sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus disease (SPD) is a common general surgical condition encountered in practice and predominantly affects young males. Surgical practice parameters for the management of SPD are variable. This study aimed to review current surgical practice parameters for SPD management in Western Australia. Methodology This study conducted a de-identified 30-item multiple-response ranking, dichotomous, quantitative, and qualitative survey of self-reported surgeon practice preferences and outcomes. The survey was sent to 115 Royal Australian College of Surgeons - Western Australia general/colorectal surgical fellows. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 27 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Results The survey response rate was 66% (N = 77). The cohort comprised mostly senior collegiate (n = 50, 74.6%), and most were low-volume practitioners (n = 49, 73.1%). For local disease control, most surgeons perform a complete wide local excision (n = 63, 94%). The preferred wound closure method was an off-midline primary closure (n = 47, 70.1%). Self-reported SPD recurrence, wound infection, and wound dehiscence rates were 10%, 10%, and 15%, respectively. The three high-ranked closure techniques were the Karydakis flap, Limberg’s flap (LF), and Z-Plasty flap. Each surgeon’s median annual SPD procedures were 10 (interquartile range = 15). The surgeons could utilize their preferred SPD closure technique (mean = 83.5%, standard deviation = ±15.6). Univariate analysis showed significant associations between years of experience and SPD flap techniques utilized, with senior surgeons significantly less likely to use either the LF (p = 0.009) or the Bascom procedure (BP) (p = 0.034). Instead, there was a preference for using healing by secondary-intention technique (SIT) compared to younger fellows (p = 0.017). A significant negative correlation existed between practice volume and SPD flap technique utilization, with low-volume surgeons less likely to prefer the gluteal fascia-cutaneous rotational flap (p = 0.049) or the BP (p = 0.010). However, low-volume practice surgeons were significantly more likely to use SITs (p = 0.023). The three most important patient factors in choosing SPD techniques were comorbidities, likely patient compliance, and attitude toward the disease. Meanwhile, factors influencing local conditions included the proximity of the disease to the anus, the number and location of pits and sinuses, and previous definitive SPD surgery. Key informants for technique preference were perceived low recurrence rate, familiarity, and overall good patient outcomes. Conclusions Surgical practice parameters for managing SPD remain highly variable. Most surgeons perform midline excision with off-midline primary closure as the gold standard. There is a clear and present need for clear, concise, and yet comprehensive guidelines on managing this chronic and often disabling condition to ensure the delivery of consistent, evidence-based care.