Response to Rituximab Induction Is a Predictive Marker in B-Cell Post-Transplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder and Allows Successful Stratification Into Rituximab or R-CHOP Consolidation in an International, Prospective, Multicenter Phase II Trial.

Purpose The Sequential Treatment of CD20-Positive Posttransplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder (PTLD-1) trial ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT01458548) established sequential treatment with four cycles of rituximab followed by four cycles of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) chemotherapy as a standard in the management of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) and identified response to rituximab induction as a prognostic factor for overall survival. We hypothesized that rituximab consolidation might be sufficient treatment for patients with a complete response after rituximab induction. Patients and Methods In this prospective, international, multicenter phase II trial, 152 treatment-naive adult solid organ transplant recipients, with CD20+ PTLD unresponsive to immunosuppression reduction, were treated with four weekly doses of rituximab induction. After restaging, complete responders continued with four courses of rituximab consolidation every 21 days; all others received four courses of rituximab plus CHOP chemotherapy every 21 days. The primary end point was treatment efficacy measured as the response rate in patients who completed therapy and the response duration in those who completed therapy and responded. Secondary end points were frequency of infections, treatment-related mortality, and overall survival in the intention-to-treat population. Results One hundred eleven of 126 patients had a complete or partial response (88%; 95% CI, 81% to 93%), of whom 88 had a complete response (70%; 95% CI, 61% to 77%). Median response duration was not reached. The 3-year estimate was 82% (95% CI, 74% to 90%). Median overall survival was 6.6 years (95% CI, 5.5 to 7.6 years). The frequency of grade 3 or 4 infections and of treatment-related mortality was 34% (95% CI, 27% to 42%) and 8% (95% CI, 5% to 14%), respectively. Response to rituximab induction remained a prognostic factor for overall survival despite treatment stratification. Conclusion In B-cell PTLD, treatment stratification into rituximab or rituximab plus CHOP consolidation on the basis of response to rituximab induction is feasible, safe, and effective.

[1]  T. Tousseyn,et al.  How I treat posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders. , 2015, Blood.

[2]  G. Salles,et al.  International Prognostic Index, Type of Transplant and Response to Rituximab Are Key Parameters to Tailor Treatment in Adults With CD20‐Positive B Cell PTLD: Clues From the PTLD‐1 Trial , 2015, American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

[3]  R. Trappe,et al.  EBV and posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disease: what to do? , 2013, Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program.

[4]  H. Riess,et al.  Early and late posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder after lung transplantation--34 cases from the European PTLD Network. , 2013, Transplantation.

[5]  J. Fishman,et al.  Pneumocystis Pneumonia in Solid Organ Transplantation , 2013, American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

[6]  F. Andersohn,et al.  Signals of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy for immunosuppressants: a disproportionality analysis of spontaneous reports within the US Adverse Event Reporting System (AERS) , 2012, Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety.

[7]  G. Salles,et al.  Sequential treatment with rituximab followed by CHOP chemotherapy in adult B-cell post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD): the prospective international multicentre phase 2 PTLD-1 trial. , 2012, The Lancet. Oncology.

[8]  E. Anaissie,et al.  Invasive fungal infections among organ transplant recipients: results of the Transplant-Associated Infection Surveillance Network (TRANSNET). , 2010, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[9]  Markus Loeffler,et al.  Six versus eight cycles of bi-weekly CHOP-14 with or without rituximab in elderly patients with aggressive CD20+ B-cell lymphomas: a randomised controlled trial (RICOVER-60). , 2008, The Lancet. Oncology.

[10]  J. Briones,et al.  Prospective phase II trial of extended treatment with rituximab in patients with B-cell post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease , 2007, Haematologica.

[11]  B. Dörken,et al.  Rituximab in the management of post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorder after solid organ transplantation: proceed with caution , 2007, Annals of Hematology.

[12]  U. Jäger,et al.  CHOP-21 for the treatment of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD) following solid organ transplantation. , 2007, Haematologica.

[13]  J. Bergerat,et al.  Long‐term survival in post‐transplant lymphoproliferative disorders with a dose‐adjusted ACVBP regimen , 2006, British journal of haematology.

[14]  R. Marcus,et al.  Anthracycline-based Chemotherapy as First-line Treatment in Adults with Malignant Posttransplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder after Solid Organ Transplantation , 2006, Transplantation.

[15]  A. López-Guillermo,et al.  CHOP-like chemotherapy plus rituximab versus CHOP-like chemotherapy alone in young patients with good-prognosis diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma: a randomised controlled trial by the MabThera International Trial (MInT) Group. , 2006, The Lancet. Oncology.

[16]  G. Salles,et al.  Efficacy and safety of rituximab in B-cell post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorders: results of a prospective multicenter phase 2 study. , 2006, Blood.

[17]  K. Olthoff,et al.  Treatment of PTLD with Rituximab or Chemotherapy , 2006, American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

[18]  B. Dörken,et al.  Effect of Anti‐CD 20 Antibody Rituximab in Patients with Post‐Transplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder (PTLD) , 2005, American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

[19]  D. Dunn,et al.  Rituximab therapy is effective for posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders after solid organ transplantation , 2005, Cancer.

[20]  E. Cesarman,et al.  Rituximab does not improve clinical outcome in a randomized phase 3 trial of CHOP with or without rituximab in patients with HIV-associated non-Hodgkin lymphoma: AIDS-Malignancies Consortium Trial 010. , 2005, Blood.

[21]  B. Sander,et al.  Posttransplant lymphoma—A single-center experience of 500 liver transplantations , 2004, Medical oncology.

[22]  B. E. C. Oiffier,et al.  CHOP Chemotherapy plus Rituximab Compared with CHOP Alone in Elderly Patients with Diffuse Large-B-Cell Lymphoma , 2002 .

[23]  N. Brousse,et al.  Durable remission after aggressive chemotherapy for very late post-kidney transplant lymphoproliferation: A report of 16 cases observed in a single center. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[24]  R. Michler,et al.  Posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disorders treated with cyclophosphamide‐doxorubicin‐vincristine‐prednisone chemotherapy , 1993, Cancer.

[25]  T. Starzl,et al.  REVERSIBILITY OF LYMPHOMAS AND LYMPHOPROLIFERATIVE LESIONS DEVELOPING UNDER CYCLOSPORIN-STEROID THERAPY , 1984, The Lancet.