Prediction of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for primary breast cancer comparing interim ultrasound, Shear Wave elastography and MRI

Abstract Background Prediction of pathological complete response (pCR) of primary breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) may influence planned surgical approaches in the breast and axilla. The aim of this project is to assess the value of interim shear wave elastography (SWE), ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) after 3 cycles in predicting pCR. Methods 64 patients receiving NACT had baseline and interim US, SWE and MRI examinations. The mean lesion stiffness at SWE, US and MRI diameter was measured at both time points. We compared four parameters with pCR status: a) Interim mean stiffness ≤ or > 50 kPat; b) Percentage stiffness reduction; c) Percentage US diameter reduction and d) Interim MRI response using RECIST criteria. The Chi square test was used to assess significance. Results Interim stiffness of ≤ or > 50 kPat gave the best prediction of pCR with pCR seen in 10 of 14 (71 %) cancers with an interim stiffness of ≤ 50 kPat, compared to 7 of 50 (14 %) of cancers with an interim stiffness of > 50 kPat, (p < 0.0001) (sensitivity 59 %, specificity 91 %, PPV 71 %, NPV 86 % and diagnostic accuracy 83 %). Percentage reduction in stiffness was the next best parameter (sensitivity 59 %, specificity 85 %, p < 0.0004) followed by reduction in MRI diameter of > 30 % (sensitivity 50 % and specificity 79 %, p = 0.03) and % reduction in US diameter (sensitivity 47 %, specificity 81 %, p = 0.03). Similar results were obtained from ROC analysis. Conclusion SWE stiffness of breast cancers after 3 cycles of NACT and changes in stiffness from baseline are strongly associated with pCR after 6 cycles.

[1]  Shuo Zhang,et al.  Comparison of strain and shear-wave ultrasounic elastography in predicting the pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancers , 2017, European Radiology.

[2]  W. Cheng,et al.  Early Evaluation of Relative Changes in Tumor Stiffness by Shear Wave Elastography Predicts the Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients With Breast Cancer , 2016, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[3]  M. Papa,et al.  Neo-adjuvant doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel in triple-negative breast cancer among BRCA1 mutation carriers and non-carriers , 2016, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[4]  N. Avril,et al.  18F-FDG PET/CT for Monitoring of Treatment Response in Breast Cancer , 2016, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[5]  L. Irwig,et al.  Agreement between MRI and pathologic breast tumor size after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and comparison with alternative tests: individual patient data meta-analysis , 2015, BMC Cancer.

[6]  G. Rauch,et al.  Diagnosis of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer by minimal invasive biopsy techniques , 2015, British Journal of Cancer.

[7]  D. Hadjiminas,et al.  Sentinel lymph node biopsy after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer: Are the current false negative rates acceptable? , 2015, Breast.

[8]  Bing Ma,et al.  Multi-Site Clinical Evaluation of DW-MRI as a Treatment Response Metric for Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy , 2015, PloS one.

[9]  Woo Kyung Moon,et al.  Shear-wave elastography in detection of residual breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. , 2014, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  Gianluca Franceschini,et al.  Effect of breast cancer phenotype on diagnostic performance of MRI in the prediction to response to neoadjuvant treatment. , 2014, European journal of radiology.

[11]  Vicky Goh,et al.  Changes in primary breast cancer heterogeneity may augment midtreatment MR imaging assessment of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. , 2014, Radiology.

[12]  A. Thompson,et al.  Does shear wave ultrasound independently predict axillary lymph node metastasis in women with invasive breast cancer? , 2013, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[13]  A. Thompson,et al.  Can shear-wave elastography predict response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in women with invasive breast cancer? , 2013, British Journal of Cancer.

[14]  A. Thompson,et al.  Differentiating benign from malignant solid breast masses: value of shear wave elastography according to lesion stiffness combined with greyscale ultrasound according to BI-RADS classification , 2012, British Journal of Cancer.

[15]  L. Esserman,et al.  Locally advanced breast cancer: MR imaging for prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy--results from ACRIN 6657/I-SPY TRIAL. , 2012, Radiology.

[16]  W. Svensson,et al.  Shear-wave elastography improves the specificity of breast US: the BE1 multinational study of 939 masses. , 2012, Radiology.

[17]  David O. Cosgrove,et al.  Shear wave elastography for breast masses is highly reproducible , 2011, European Radiology.

[18]  K. Jung,et al.  Comparison of mammography, sonography, MRI and clinical examination in patients with locally advanced or inflammatory breast cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy. , 2011, The British journal of radiology.

[19]  E. Provenzano,et al.  Accuracy of unidimensional and volumetric ultrasound measurements in predicting good pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients , 2011, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[20]  Kim Thomson,et al.  Quantitative shear wave ultrasound elastography: initial experience in solid breast masses , 2010, Breast Cancer Research.

[21]  M. Scoggins,et al.  Comparison of mammography, sonography, MRI and clinical examination in patients with locally advanced or inflammatory breast cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy , 2012 .