Getting stuff done: Comparing e-mail requests from students in higher education in Britain and Australia

A small corpus of student e-mail requests to academic staff in a British and an Australian university was collected in order to investigate the cross-cultural nature of Englishes in these requesting events. The notions of account and but-justification, together with the concepts of equity and equilibrium are used to explicate the distribution of various features associated with these requests. Results indicate that the British data orient to deferential dependence whereas the Australian data exhibit interdependent egalitarianism. Finally, the process of our analysis brings to light the fact that we ought to refine Heider's (1958) theory of obligation and this, we do. The overall claims of this paper are that the situated nature of student e-mail requests can have a great bearing on the discursive construction of student identities, that this has a bearing on how things get done, and that how things get done in different varieties of English merits further investigation.

[1]  G. Kasper,et al.  Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies , 1991 .

[2]  Victor Ho,et al.  Constructing identities through request e-mail discourse☆ , 2010 .

[3]  P. Eckert,et al.  Think Practically and Look Locally: Language and Gender as Community-Based Practice , 1992 .

[4]  Cliff Goddard,et al.  “Lift your game, Martina!” – Deadpan jocular irony and the ethnopragmatics of Australian English , 2006 .

[5]  Michael Haugh.  Jocular mockery, (dis)affiliation, and face , 2010 .

[6]  Joan Waldvogel,et al.  Greetings and Closings in Workplace Email , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[7]  C. Antaki.  Explaining and Arguing: The Social Organization of Accounts , 1994 .

[8]  J. Searle.  Rationality in Action , 2001 .

[9]  S. Mills.  Gender and Politeness , 2003 .

[10]  Bethan L. Davies,et al.  Institutional apologies in UK higher education: Getting back into the black before going into the red , 2007 .

[11]  M. Economidou-Kogetsidis.  Please answer me as soon as possible: Pragmatic failure in non-native speakers e-mail requests to , 2011 .

[12]  G. Leech.  Principles of pragmatics , 1983 .

[13]  Victor Ho,et al.  What functions do intertextuality and interdiscursivity serve in request e-mail discourse? , 2011 .

[14]  Jonathan Culpeper,et al.  Reflections on impoliteness, relational work and power. , 2008 .

[15]  J. Searle.  Expression and Meaning: A taxonomy of illocutionary acts , 1975 .

[16]  Gino Eelen.  A critique of politeness theories , 2001 .

[17]  E. Goffman.  On face-work; an analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. , 1955, Psychiatry.

[18]  H. Grice.  Logic and conversation , 1975 .

[19]  John Austin,et al.  A plea for excuses , 1971 .

[20]  Sigrun Biesenbach-Lucas,et al.  Students Writing Emails to Faculty: An Examination of E-Politeness among Native and Non-Native Speakers of English , 2007 .

[21]  Penelope Brown,et al.  Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage , 1989 .

[22]  Bethan L. Davies.  GRICE'S COOPERATIVE PRINCIPLE: GETTING THE MEANING ACROSS , 2000 .

[23]  T. Schelling.  The Strategy of Conflict , 1963 .

[24]  Florian Coulmas,et al.  "Poison to Your Soul" Thanks and Apologies Contrastively Viewed , 1981 .

[25]  Kirk W. Duthler.  The Politeness of Requests Made Via Email and Voicemail: Support for the Hyperpersonal Model , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[26]  Susan C. Herring,et al.  Computer-mediated communication on the internet , 2005, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[27]  Michael Haugh,et al.  The discursive challenge to politeness research: An interactional alternative , 2007 .

[28]  F. Heider.  The psychology of interpersonal relations , 1958 .

[29]  A. Jaworski.  Apologies and non-apologies: Negotiation in speech act realization , 1994 .

[30]  William L. Benoit,et al.  Accounts, excuses, and apologies : a theory of image restoration strategies , 1994 .

[31]  Peter Schönbach,et al.  Account Episodes: The Management or Escalation of Conflict , 1990 .

[32]  A. Merrison,et al.  Inequity in the pursuit of intimacy: an analysis of British pick-up artist interactions , 2012 .

[33]  Helen P Woodfield,et al.  ‘I just need more time’: A study of native and non-native students' requests to faculty for an extension , 2010 .

[34]  S. Blum-Kulka.  Indirectness and politeness in requests: Same or different? , 1987 .

[35]  Michael Haugh.  Anticipated versus inferred politeness , 2003 .

[36]  J. Austin.  How to do things with words , 1962 .

[37]  Astrid Jensen.  Discourse strategies in professional e-mail negotiation: a case study , 2009 .

[38]  Maicol Formentelli.  Address strategies in a British academic setting , 2009 .

[39]  Jeffrey D. Robinson.  The Sequential Organization of "Explicit" Apologies in Naturally Occurring English , 2004 .

[40]  Bethan L. Davies.  Grice's Cooperative Principle: Meaning and rationality , 2007 .

[41]  Gün R. Semin,et al.  The accountability of conduct : a social psychological analysis , 1984 .

[42]  R. Arundale.  Face as relational and interactional: A communication framework for research on face, facework, and politeness , 2006 .

[43]  P. Rogers,et al.  Reconceptualizing Politeness to Accommodate Dynamic Tensions in Subordinate-to-Superior Reporting , 2003 .

[44]  Michael Haugh,et al.  Mock impoliteness, jocular mockery and jocular abuse in Australian and British English , 2012 .

[45]  Ulla K. Bunz,et al.  Politeness Accommodation in Electronic Mail , 2004 .

[46]  P. Drew,et al.  Contingency and Action: A Comparison of Two Forms of Requesting , 2008 .

[47]  Penelope Brown,et al.  Politeness: Some universals in language use [Reprint] , 1999 .

[48]  J. Holmes.  Apologies in New Zealand English , 1990, Language in Society.