Figure heads are words without autonomous content, such as t he copula and the infinitival to. They pose a challenge for the head-driven semantics of HPSG -94, since the latter requires the CONTENTjNUCLEUS value of ahead-complement combination to be identical to the one of its head daughter. As a consequence, if the head i s semantically vacuous, the combination is —erroneously— predicted to be vacuous as wel l. In order to repair this, HPSG-94 stipulates that the CONTENT value of a vacuous word i s i entified with the one of its complement. Technically, this gives the right result , but it leaves a number of issues unresolved. First, if the copula is vacuous, then what happe ns to the semantic contribution of its tense? Second, what are the criteria for identifying v acuous words? Third, are there any alternatives for the figure head treatment, and if so, wha t is the kind of evidence that can be used to motivate a choice? In dealing with these questi ons, I will integrate a DRT style treatment of the tenses in the HPSG framework (section 3), I will define a number of criteria for identifying vacuous verbs (section 4) and I wil l provide some empirical evidence against the figure head treatment, replacing it with an alter native analysis in which vacuous verbs have no CONTENT feature at all (section 5).
[1]
Ivan A. Sag,et al.
Syntactic Theory: A Formal Introduction
,
1999,
Computational Linguistics.
[2]
Frank Van Eynde,et al.
Tense, aspect & negation
,
1998
.
[3]
Uwe Reyle,et al.
From discourse to logic
,
1993
.
[4]
JULIUS M. MORAVCSIK.
TENSE, ASPECT, AND NEGATION
,
1982
.
[5]
Terence Parsons,et al.
Events in the Semantics of English: A Study in Subatomic Semantics
,
1990
.
[6]
Hans Reichenbach,et al.
Elements of symbolic logic
,
1948
.
[7]
F. Palmer.
The English Verb
,
1974
.
[8]
Ivan A. Sag,et al.
Book Reviews: Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar and German in Head-driven Phrase-structure Grammar
,
1996,
CL.
[9]
Antonio Sanfilippo,et al.
Grammatical relations, thematic roles and verb semantics
,
1991
.