Resilient communication for smart grid ubiquitous sensor network: State of the art and prospects for next generation

We explored the adaptation of the USN architecture for SG communication.We reviewed existing communication technologies that can be deployed in SG USN.Vulnerability and challenges of the USN architecture for SG were highlighted.The choice of communication technologies reduces complexity in SG communication.A secure and QoS aware USN middleware can guarantee requirements of SG application. Smart grid combines a set of functionalities that can only be achieved through ubiquitous sensing and communication across the electrical grid. The communication infrastructure must be able to cope with an increasing number of traffic types which is as a result of increased control and monitoring, penetration of renewable energy sources and adoption of electric vehicles. The communication infrastructure must serve as a substrate that supports different traffic requirements such as QoS (i.e. latency, bandwidth and delay) across an integrated communication system. This engenders the implementation of middleware systems which considers QoS requirements for different types of traffic in order to allow prompt delivery of these traffic in a smart grid system. A heterogeneous communication applied through the adaptation of the Ubiquitous Sensor Network (USN) layered structure to smart grid has been proposed by the International Telecommunication Union (ITU). This paper explores the ITU's USN architecture and presents the communication technologies which can be deployed within the USN schematic layers for a secure and resilient communication together with a study of their pro's and con's, vulnerabilities and challenges. It also discusses the factors that can affect the selection of communication technologies and suggests possible communications technologies at different USN layers. Furthermore, the paper highlights the USN middleware system as an important mechanism to tackle scalability and interoperability problems as well as shield the communication complexities and heterogeneity of smart grid.

[1]  Nada Golmie,et al.  NIST Framework and Roadmap for Smart Grid Interoperability Standards, Release 1.0 , 2010 .

[2]  Syed Islam,et al.  Home Area Network technology assessment for demand response in smart grid environment , 2010, 2010 20th Australasian Universities Power Engineering Conference.

[3]  Young-Jin Kim,et al.  A secure decentralized data-centric information infrastructure for smart grid , 2010, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[4]  Kemal Akkaya,et al.  PARP-S: A secure piggybacking-based ARP for IEEE 802.11s-based Smart Grid AMI networks , 2015, Comput. Commun..

[5]  Hamid Sharif,et al.  A Survey on Smart Grid Communication Infrastructures: Motivations, Requirements and Challenges , 2013, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[6]  José-Fernán Martínez,et al.  Middleware Architectures for the Smart Grid: Survey and Challenges in the Foreseeable Future , 2013 .

[7]  Bahram Honary,et al.  IP-centric high rate narrowband PLC for smart grid applications , 2011, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[8]  S. S. Venkata,et al.  Coordinated Charging of Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles to Minimize Distribution System Losses , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[9]  Sagar Naik,et al.  A Survey of Communication Protocols for Automatic Meter Reading Applications , 2011, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[10]  Francesca Cuomo,et al.  Routing in ZigBee: Benefits from Exploiting the IEEE 802.15.4 Association Tree , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Conference on Communications.

[11]  Nadeem Javaid,et al.  Minimizing Electricity Theft Using Smart Meters in AMI , 2012, 2012 Seventh International Conference on P2P, Parallel, Grid, Cloud and Internet Computing.

[12]  Lang Tong,et al.  Malicious Data Attacks on the Smart Grid , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[13]  Jie Wu,et al.  Improving network lifetime using sensors with adjustable sensing ranges , 2006, Int. J. Sens. Networks.

[14]  Agustín Zaballos,et al.  Heterogeneous communication architecture for the smart grid , 2011, IEEE Network.

[15]  Marie Kim,et al.  COSMOS: A Middleware for Integrated Data Processing over Heterogeneous Sensor Networks , 2008 .

[16]  Ning Lu,et al.  Smart-grid security issues , 2010, IEEE Security & Privacy.

[17]  Liang Zhou,et al.  Service-oriented middleware for smart grid: Principle, infrastructure, and application , 2013, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[18]  Jamil Y. Khan,et al.  A comprehensive review of the application characteristics and traffic requirements of a smart grid communications network , 2013, Comput. Networks.

[19]  Michael Kolawole Communication Networks And Systems , 2002 .

[20]  M. Maier,et al.  The Über-FiWi network: QoS guarantees for triple-play and future Smart Grid applications , 2012, 2012 14th International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks (ICTON).

[21]  Chong Wang,et al.  Packet-oriented communication protocols for Smart Grid Services over low-speed PLC , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Symposium on Power Line Communications and Its Applications.

[22]  Tarlochan S. Sidhu,et al.  Opportunities and challenges of wireless communication technologies for smart grid applications , 2010, IEEE PES General Meeting.

[23]  Marco Conti,et al.  Design and performance evaluation of throughput-aware rate adaptation protocols for IEEE 802.11 wireless networks , 2009, Perform. Evaluation.

[24]  Yang Xiao,et al.  Future Generation Computer Systems a Survey of Communication/networking in Smart Grids , 2022 .

[25]  Marco Conti,et al.  The role of the RPL routing protocol for smart grid communications , 2013, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[26]  Yi Xu,et al.  A survey on the communication architectures in smart grid , 2011, Comput. Networks.

[27]  Mourad Debbabi,et al.  Communication security for smart grid distribution networks , 2013, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[28]  Kemal Akkaya,et al.  A survey of routing protocols for smart grid communications , 2012, Comput. Networks.

[29]  Siu-Ming Yiu,et al.  Privacy-preserving advance power reservation , 2012, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[30]  Nadeem Javaid,et al.  A review of wireless communications for smart grid , 2015 .

[31]  Xiaohui Liang,et al.  Securing smart grid: cyber attacks, countermeasures, and challenges , 2012, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[32]  Kwang-Cheng Chen,et al.  Smart attacks in smart grid communication networks , 2012, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[33]  D.E. Nordell,et al.  Communication systems for Distribution Automation , 2008, 2008 IEEE/PES Transmission and Distribution Conference and Exposition.

[34]  Fred Baker,et al.  Internet Protocols for the Smart Grid , 2011, RFC.

[35]  Byung Il Choi,et al.  Interference Rejection Using Filter-Based Sensor Array in VLC Systems , 2012, IEEE Sensors Journal.

[36]  Steven B. Leeb,et al.  Power signature analysis , 2003 .

[37]  Marco Conti,et al.  The role of communication systems in smart grids: Architectures, technical solutions and research challenges , 2013, Comput. Commun..

[38]  Vahid Madani,et al.  Wide-Area Monitoring, Protection, and Control of Future Electric Power Networks , 2011, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[39]  Fangxing Li,et al.  Next-Generation Monitoring, Analysis, and Control for the Future Smart Control Center , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[40]  Yi Hu,et al.  Integrated system architecture and technology roadmap toward WAMPAC , 2011, ISGT 2011.

[41]  Yang Xiao Communication and Networking in Smart Grids , 2012 .

[42]  Shiao-Li Tsao,et al.  A survey of energy efficient MAC protocols for IEEE 802.11 WLAN , 2011, Comput. Commun..

[43]  Carles Gomez,et al.  Wireless home automation networks: A survey of architectures and technologies , 2010, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[44]  Amit Chhabra,et al.  Emerging Wireless Standards - WiFi, ZigBee and WiMAX , 2007 .

[45]  Roberto Di Pietro,et al.  Security in wireless ad-hoc networks - A survey , 2014, Comput. Commun..