Improving the Efficiency of Bulk Heterojunction Polymer Solar Cells Via Binary-Solvent Treatment

The effects of different binary-solvent treatments on the performance of polymer solar cells (PSCs) with thieno [3, 4-b] thiophene/benzodithiophene (PTB7):(6, 6)-phenyl-C71-butyric acid methyl ester (PC71BM) as active layers are systematically investigated. The binary-solvents are obtained by mixing a primary solvent of methanol (MeOH) with a secondary solvent comprising of 2-chlorophenol (2-CP), dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO), or o-xylene. By analyzing the variation of photovoltaic performance and the nanostructure morphology of active layers, we find that both polarity and boiling point of the secondary solvent are playing an important role in controlling the nanostructure morphology of PTB7:PC71BM blends. In particular, 2-CP and DMSO with higher polarity and boiling point mixed with MeOH could significantly increase the power conversion efficiency from 6.47% (MeOH-treated device) to 7.81% and 7.19%, respectively. The improved photovoltaic performance of binary-solvent-treated PSCs is mainly due to the enhanced light absorption, optimized blend morphology, and increased charge carrier mobilities, resulting in efficient exciton generation, effective charge separation, and balanced charge transport. Moreover, the impedance spectroscopy results indicate that the binary-solvent treatment can achieve electrically ideal interfacial capacitance and, accordingly, suppress the bimolecular recombination in the blends.

[1]  Takayuki Kuwabara,et al.  Mechanistic insights into UV-induced electron transfer from PCBM to titanium oxide in inverted-type organic thin film solar cells using AC impedance spectroscopy. , 2010, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[2]  J. Hummelen,et al.  Polymer Photovoltaic Cells: Enhanced Efficiencies via a Network of Internal Donor-Acceptor Heterojunctions , 1995, Science.

[3]  W. Su,et al.  Facile hot solvent vapor annealing for high performance polymer solar cell using spray process , 2013 .

[4]  Jenny Nelson,et al.  Factors Limiting Device Efficiency in Organic Photovoltaics , 2013, Advanced materials.

[5]  Wei Jiang,et al.  Integrated Molecular, Interfacial, and Device Engineering towards High‐Performance Non‐Fullerene Based Organic Solar Cells , 2014, Advanced materials.

[6]  Guangyong Li,et al.  Recent Progress in Modeling, Simulation, and Optimization of Polymer Solar Cells , 2012, IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics.

[7]  Tracey M. Clarke,et al.  A Comparison of Five Experimental Techniques to Measure Charge Carrier Lifetime in Polymer/Fullerene Solar Cells , 2015 .

[8]  Long Ye,et al.  Remove the Residual Additives toward Enhanced Efficiency with Higher Reproducibility in Polymer Solar Cells , 2013 .

[9]  Junsheng Yu,et al.  Towards High Performance Organic Photovoltaic Cells: A Review of Recent Development in Organic Photovoltaics , 2014 .

[10]  Benjamin J. Leever,et al.  In Situ Characterization of Lifetime and Morphology in Operating Bulk Heterojunction Organic Photovoltaic Devices by Impedance Spectroscopy , 2012 .

[11]  V. Mihailetchi,et al.  Space-charge limited photocurrent. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[12]  S. Kannappan,et al.  Characteristics and the effect of additives on the nanomorphology of PTB7/PC71BM composite films , 2013 .

[13]  Juliane Kniepert,et al.  Nongeminate and Geminate Recombination in PTB7:PCBM Solar Cells , 2014, 2106.10101.

[14]  T. Welton,et al.  Empirical Parameters of Solvent Polarity , 2010 .

[15]  Junsheng Yu,et al.  Effects of different polar solvents for solvent vapor annealing treatment on the performance of polymer solar cells , 2014 .

[16]  Kwanghee Lee,et al.  Air‐Stable Organic Solar Cells Using an Iodine‐Free Solvent Additive , 2016 .

[17]  H. Ade,et al.  Efficient organic solar cells processed from hydrocarbon solvents , 2016, Nature Energy.

[18]  Yang Yang,et al.  The study of solvent additive effects in efficient polymer photovoltaics via impedance spectroscopy , 2014 .

[19]  A. Savoini,et al.  Neat C₇₀-based bulk-heterojunction polymer solar cells with excellent acceptor dispersion. , 2014, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[20]  Joshua H. Carpenter,et al.  Highly Efficient Organic Solar Cells with Improved Vertical Donor–Acceptor Compositional Gradient Via an Inverted Off‐Center Spinning Method , 2016, Advanced materials.

[21]  Fujun Zhang,et al.  A two-step strategy to clarify the roles of a solution processed PFN interfacial layer in highly efficient polymer solar cells , 2015 .

[22]  Steven Abbott,et al.  Determination of Solubility Parameters for Organic Semiconductor Formulations , 2011 .

[23]  Alan J. Heeger,et al.  Charge Formation, Recombination, and Sweep‐Out Dynamics in Organic Solar Cells , 2012 .

[24]  Yanchun Han,et al.  Improving the Morphology of PCDTBT:PC70BM Bulk Heterojunction by Mixed-Solvent Vapor-Assisted Imprinting: Inhibiting Intercalation, Optimizing Vertical Phase Separation, and Enhancing Photon Absorption , 2014 .

[25]  In-Wook Hwang,et al.  Top‐Down Approach for Nanophase Reconstruction in Bulk Heterojunction Solar Cells , 2014, Advanced materials.

[26]  Fujun Zhang,et al.  Adjusting acceptor redistribution for highly efficient solvent additive-free polymer solar cells , 2016 .

[27]  A. Heeger,et al.  High‐Efficiency Polymer Solar Cells Enhanced by Solvent Treatment , 2013, Advanced materials.

[28]  Gang Li,et al.  For the Bright Future—Bulk Heterojunction Polymer Solar Cells with Power Conversion Efficiency of 7.4% , 2010, Advanced materials.

[29]  Jinsong Huang,et al.  Efficiency Enhancement in Polymer Solar Cells With a Polar Small Molecule Both at Interface and in the Bulk Heterojunction Layer , 2015, IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics.

[30]  D. Gundlach,et al.  Predicting the J–V Curve in Organic Photovoltaics Using Impedance Spectroscopy , 2014 .

[31]  F. Liu,et al.  Solvent‐Polarity‐Induced Active Layer Morphology Control in Crystalline Diketopyrrolopyrrole‐Based Low Band Gap Polymer Photovoltaics , 2014 .

[32]  I. Samuel,et al.  Charge carrier mobility of the organic photovoltaic materials PTB7 and PC71BM and its influence on device performance , 2015 .

[33]  A. Heeger,et al.  25th Anniversary Article: Bulk Heterojunction Solar Cells: Understanding the Mechanism of Operation , 2014, Advanced materials.

[34]  叶龙,et al.  From Binary to Ternary Solvent: Morphology Fine-tuning of D/A Blends in PDPP3T-based Polymer Solar Cells , 2012 .

[35]  Chan Eon Park,et al.  Dramatically enhanced performances and ideally controlled nano-morphology via co-solvent processing in low bandgap polymer solar cells , 2016 .

[36]  Junsheng Yu,et al.  Toward Efficient Thick Active PTB7 Photovoltaic Layers Using Diphenyl Ether as a Solvent Additive. , 2016, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[37]  Shuai Guo,et al.  Effect of alcohol treatment on the performance of PTB7:PC71BM bulk heterojunction solar cells. , 2015, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[38]  Luping Yu,et al.  Understanding Low Bandgap Polymer PTB7 and Optimizing Polymer Solar Cells Based on It , 2014, Advanced materials.

[39]  Yang Yang,et al.  Polymer solar cells , 2012, Nature Photonics.

[40]  Feng Gao,et al.  Fullerene‐Free Polymer Solar Cells with over 11% Efficiency and Excellent Thermal Stability , 2016, Advanced materials.

[41]  Kwanghee Lee,et al.  Bulk‐Heterojunction Organic Solar Cells: Five Core Technologies for Their Commercialization , 2016, Advanced materials.

[42]  A. Arias,et al.  Materials and applications for large area electronics: solution-based approaches. , 2010, Chemical reviews.

[43]  Junsheng Yu,et al.  Effect of two-step annealing on the performance of ternary polymer solar cells based on P3HT:PC71BM:SQ , 2014 .