Implementation of a new urban energy budget scheme in the MetUM. Part I: Description and idealized simulations

This paper describes the formulation of a new urban scheme, MORUSES (Met Office–Reading Urban Surface Exchange Scheme) for use in the Met Office Unified Model. The implementation of the new scheme ensures that (1) the new scheme offers more flexibility in the parametrization of the building properties, and hence provides a more realistic representation of the fluxes; (2) the bulk outputs are in satisfactory agreement with previous observational studies; and (3) the impact of the new scheme on the energy balance fluxes is similar to the impact of the current urban scheme when set up to mimic it. As well as having a better physical basis, MORUSES also gains in flexibility in applications and adaptations to different urban materials as well as urban planning. The new scheme represents the urban area as a composition of two tiles, a canyon and a roof, using a simple 2D geometry. Sensitivity analysis to canyon geometry and thickness of the roof canopy emphasizes the gain in flexibility captured by the new scheme. Copyright © 2010 Royal Meteorological Society and Crown Copyright

[1]  Richard Essery,et al.  Explicit representation of subgrid heterogeneity in a GCM land surface scheme , 2003 .

[2]  Janet F. Barlow,et al.  A Wind Tunnel Model for Quantifying Fluxes in the Urban Boundary Layer , 2002 .

[3]  A. Clappier,et al.  An Urban Surface Exchange Parameterisation for Mesoscale Models , 2002 .

[4]  Ian N. Harman,et al.  Radiative Exchange in an Urban Street Canyon , 2004 .

[5]  V. Masson,et al.  Inclusion of a Drag Approach in the Town Energy Balance (TEB) Scheme: Offline 1D Evaluation in a Street Canyon , 2008 .

[6]  Sang-Hyun Lee,et al.  A Vegetated Urban Canopy Model for Meteorological and Environmental Modelling , 2007 .

[7]  Valéry Masson,et al.  A Physically-Based Scheme For The Urban Energy Budget In Atmospheric Models , 2000 .

[8]  Ivan Mammarella,et al.  The Effect of Stratification on the Aerodynamic Roughness Length and Displacement Height , 2008 .

[9]  H. Kondo,et al.  A Simple Single-Layer Urban Canopy Model For Atmospheric Models: Comparison With Multi-Layer And Slab Models , 2001 .

[10]  Samuel Y. K. Yee.  The force-restore method revisited , 1988 .

[11]  T. Oke,et al.  The Energy Balance of an Urban Canyon , 1977 .

[12]  Katsuhito Yamaguchi,et al.  The Influence Of Urban Canopy Configuration On Urban Albedo , 2001 .

[13]  A. Blackadar,et al.  High resolution models of the planetary boundary layer , 1979 .

[14]  Jan Polcher,et al.  A Proposed Structure for Coupling Tiled Surfaces with the Planetary Boundary Layer , 2004 .

[15]  R. Betts,et al.  The impact of new land surface physics on the GCM simulation of climate and climate sensitivity , 1999 .

[16]  Timothy R. Oke,et al.  Evaluation of the Town Energy Balance (TEB) Scheme with Direct Measurements from Dry Districts in Two Cities , 2002 .

[17]  R. Griffiths,et al.  An improved method for the estimation of surface roughness of obstacle arrays , 1998 .

[18]  Aya Hagishima,et al.  A Simple Energy Balance Model for Regular Building Arrays , 2005 .

[19]  R. Dickinson,et al.  The Footprint of Urban Areas on Global Climate as Characterized by MODIS , 2005 .

[20]  Patrice G. Mestayer,et al.  Parameterization of the Urban Water Budget with the Submesoscale Soil Model , 2006 .

[21]  M. Best,et al.  Progress towards better weather forecasts for city dwellers: from short range to climate change , 2006 .

[22]  James A. Voogt,et al.  Modeling Surface Sensible Heat Flux Using Surface Radiative Temperatures in a Simple Urban Area , 2000 .

[23]  Ari Karppinen,et al.  Integrated Systems for Forecasting Urban Meteorology , Air Pollution and Population Exposure FUMAPEX , 2006 .

[24]  G. Martin,et al.  A New Boundary Layer Mixing Scheme. Part I: Scheme Description and Single-Column Model Tests , 2000 .

[25]  A. Porson,et al.  Implementation of a new urban energy budget scheme into MetUM. Part II: Validation against observations and model intercomparison , 2010 .

[26]  C. S. B. Grimmond,et al.  Evaluation of the Urban Tile in MOSES using Surface Energy Balance Observations , 2006 .

[27]  Ian N. Harman,et al.  The surface energy balance and boundary layer over urban street canyons , 2006 .

[28]  E. Sparrow,et al.  Radiation Heat Transfer , 1978 .

[29]  Ian N. Harman,et al.  Scalar fluxes from urban street canyons. Part I: Laboratory simulation , 2004 .

[30]  Peter Clark,et al.  Evolution of Urban Surface Exchange in the UK Met Office’s Unified Model , 2009 .

[31]  Timothy R. Oke,et al.  Aerodynamic Properties of Urban Areas Derived from Analysis of Surface Form , 1999 .

[32]  J. Monteith,et al.  Boundary Layer Climates. , 1979 .

[33]  Ian N. Harman,et al.  Scalar Fluxes from Urban Street Canyons Part II: Model , 2004 .

[34]  Valéry Masson,et al.  Modeling the Surface Energy Balance of the Core of an Old Mediterranean City: Marseille , 2004 .

[35]  David J. Thomson,et al.  The U.K. Met Office's Next-Generation Atmospheric Dispersion Model, NAME III , 2007 .

[36]  A. Porson,et al.  How Many Facets are Needed to Represent the Surface Energy Balance of an Urban Area? , 2009 .

[37]  Michael Schatzmann,et al.  Meteorology applied to urban air pollution problems: concepts from COST 715 , 2005 .

[38]  P. J. Mason,et al.  The formation of areally‐averaged roughness lengths , 1988 .

[39]  M. Best,et al.  Representing urban areas within operational numerical weather prediction models , 2005 .

[40]  Maria Tombrou,et al.  The International Urban Energy Balance Models Comparison Project: First Results from Phase 1 , 2010 .

[41]  J. Garratt.  The Atmospheric Boundary Layer , 1992 .

[42]  M. Aida,et al.  Urban albedo as a function of the urban structure — A two-dimensional numerical simulation , 1982 .

[43]  P. Mestayer,et al.  Parameterization of the Urban Energy Budget with the Submesoscale Soil Model , 2006 .

[44]  A. Brown,et al.  The role of surface heterogeneity in modelling the stable boundary layer , 2007 .