Quantitative Depth Quality Assessment of RGBD Cameras At Close Range Using 3D Printed Fixtures

Mobile robots that manipulate their environments require high-accuracy scene understanding at close range. Typically this understanding is achieved with RGBD cameras, but the evaluation process for selecting an appropriate RGBD camera for the application is minimally quantitative. Limited manufacturer-published metrics do not translate to observed quality in real-world cluttered environments, since quality is application-specific. To bridge the gap, we present a method for quantitatively measuring depth quality using a set of extendable 3D printed fixtures that approximate real-world conditions. By framing depth quality as point cloud density and root mean square error (RMSE) from a known geometry, we present a method that is extendable by other system integrators for custom environments. We show a comparison of 3 cameras and present a case study for camera selection, provide reference meshes and analysis code, and discuss further extensions.

[1]  Francisco José Madrid-Cuevas,et al.  Automatic generation and detection of highly reliable fiducial markers under occlusion , 2014, Pattern Recognit..

[2]  Anders Grunnet-Jepsen,et al.  Intel(R) RealSense(TM) Stereoscopic Depth Cameras , 2017, 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW).

[3]  Elise Lachat,et al.  Assessment and Calibration of a RGB-D Camera (Kinect v2 Sensor) Towards a Potential Use for Close-Range 3D Modeling , 2015, Remote. Sens..

[4]  Doyoung Byun,et al.  3D printing of high-resolution PLA-based structures by hybrid electrohydrodynamic and fused deposition modeling techniques , 2016 .

[5]  Saeid Nahavandi,et al.  Measuring depth accuracy in RGBD cameras , 2013, 2013, 7th International Conference on Signal Processing and Communication Systems (ICSPCS).

[6]  S. Umeyama,et al.  Least-Squares Estimation of Transformation Parameters Between Two Point Patterns , 1991, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[7]  Richard Szeliski,et al.  A Comparison and Evaluation of Multi-View Stereo Reconstruction Algorithms , 2006, 2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'06).

[8]  Richard Szeliski,et al.  A Taxonomy and Evaluation of Dense Two-Frame Stereo Correspondence Algorithms , 2001, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[9]  Didier Stricker,et al.  Comparison of Kinect V1 and V2 Depth Images in Terms of Accuracy and Precision , 2016, ACCV Workshops.

[10]  Andreas Geiger,et al.  Are we ready for autonomous driving? The KITTI vision benchmark suite , 2012, 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.