A New Measurement Method in Graf Technique: Prediction of Future Acetabular Development Is Possible in Physiologically Immature Hips

Background: Universal ultrasound screening has led to overtreatment and higher follow-up rates than are found with clinical examination alone because of high incidence of physiologically immature hips (type IIa) in the first weeks of life. The ability to predict future acetabular development in physiologically immature hips (type IIa) would therefore help to reduce overtreatment and unnecessary follow-up. Methods: We described the &ggr;-angle to assess the femoral head coverage by the acetabular roof, which is measured between the baseline defined by Graf and the cartilaginous edge line connecting the inferior point of the iliac bone (lower limb) to the medial corner of the acetabular labrum. We retrospectively analyzed ultrasonographic findings of infants with developmental dysplasia of the hip diagnosed in our hospital and infants with normal hips screened in our hospital. Group 1 (35 hips) consists of type IIa hips at initial examination and went on to develop into dysplastic hips at follow-up. Group 2 (279 hips) consists of type IIa hips at initial examination and went on to develop into normal hips (type I) at follow-up. Results: The &ggr;-angles of type IIa hips that developed into type I hip at follow-up ranged between 77 and 82. The &ggr;-angles of type IIa hips that developed into hip dysplasia ranged between 72 and 78. All type IIa hips that had &ggr;-angles >78 degrees developed into normal hips. We also observed that all type IIa hips that had &ggr;-angles <77 degrees developed into dysplasia. Conclusions: The amount of cartilage mass covering the femoral head, which is a part of the acetabular roof, can therefore provide information about future acetabular development. This paper describes a new method of measurement (the &ggr;-angle) that assesses the extent of the cartilage coverage of the femoral head, which can predict acetabular development. Its use would decrease the rates of unnecessary follow-up and treatment. Level of Evidence: Level II (development of diagnostic criteria on the basis of consecutive patients).

[1]  R. Graf.  [The use of ultrasonography in developmental dysplasia of the hip]. , 2007, Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica.

[2]  S. Seber,et al.  [Our three-year experience with an ultrasonographic hip screening program conducted in infants at 3 to 4 weeks of age]. , 2006, Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica.

[3]  K. White,et al.  Ultrasonographic findings in hips with a positive Ortolani sign and their relationship to Pavlik harness failure. , 2010, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[4]  A. Pillai,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of static graf technique of ultrasound evaluation of infant hips for developmental dysplasia , 2010, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[5]  S. Weinstein,et al.  [The natural history of acetabular development in developmental dysplasia of the hip]. , 2007, Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica.

[6]  G. Zielhuis,et al.  Effectiveness of ultrasound screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip , 2004, Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition.

[7]  G. Zielhuis,et al.  The natural history of developmental dysplasia of the hip: sonographic findings in infants of 1–3 months of age , 2005, Journal of pediatric orthopedics. Part B.

[8]  A. Fanaroff,et al.  Neonatal hip instability and risk of total hip replacement in young adulthood: Follow-up of 2,218,596 newborns from the Medical Birth Registry of Norway in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register , 2009 .

[9]  I. Wada,et al.  MRI Findings in Residual Hip Dysplasia , 2011, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[10]  Ozren Vrdoljak,et al.  Evaluation of ultrasonographic angle and linear parameters in the diagnosis of developmental dysplasia of the hip , 2004, Journal of pediatric orthopedics. Part B.

[11]  K. Khoshhal,et al.  Acetabular Cartilaginous Angle: A New Method for Predicting Acetabular Development in Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip in Children Between 2 and 18 Months of Age , 2008, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[12]  K. Rosendahl,et al.  Ultrasound in the diagnosis of developmental dysplasia of the hip in newborns. The European approach. A review of methods, accuracy and clinical validity , 2007, European Radiology.

[13]  I. Dalen,et al.  Diagnosis of congenital hip dysplasia in the newborn , 2008, Acta orthopaedica.

[14]  P. Cerutti,et al.  The Role of Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip , 2007, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[15]  R. T. Lie,et al.  Ultrasound screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip in the neonate: the effect on treatment rate and prevalence of late cases. , 1994, Pediatrics.