Anastomotic Leaks After Intestinal Anastomosis: It's Later Than You Think

Purpose:Anastomotic leaks are among the most dreaded complications after colorectal surgery. However, problems with definitions and the retrospective nature of previous analyses have been major limitations. We sought to use a prospective database to define the true incidence and presentation of anastomotic leakage after intestinal anastomosis. Methods:A prospective database of two colorectal surgeons was reviewed over a 10-year period (1995–2004). The incidence of leak by surgical site, timing of diagnosis, method of detection, and treatment was noted. Complications were entered prospectively by a nurse practitioner directly involved in patient care. Standardized criteria for diagnosis were used. A logistic regression model was used to discriminate statistical variation. Results:A total of 1223 patients underwent resection and anastomosis during the study period. Mean age was 59.1 years. Leaks occurred in 33 patients (2.7%). Diagnosis was made a mean of 12.7 days postoperatively, including four beyond 30 days (12.1%). There was no difference in leak rate by surgeon (3.6% vs. 2.2%; P = 0.08). The leak rate was similar by surgical site except for a markedly increased leak rate with ileorectal anastomosis (P = 0.001). Twelve leaks were diagnosed clinically versus 21 radiographically. Contrast enema correctly identified only 4 of 10 leaks, whereas CT correctly identified 17 of 19. A total of 14 of 33 (42%) patients had their leak diagnosed only after readmission. Fifteen patients required fecal diversion, whereas 18 could be managed nonoperatively. Conclusions:Anastomotic leaks are frequently diagnosed late in the postoperative period and often after initial hospital discharge, highlighting the importance of prospective data entry and adequate follow-up. CT scan is the preferred diagnostic modality when imaging is required. More than half of leaks can be managed without fecal diversion.

[1]  D. Ilstrup,et al.  Gastrointestinal Anastomoses Factors Affecting Early Complications , 1987, Annals of surgery.

[2]  R. Rege,et al.  Treatment of anastomotic leakage following low anterior colon resection. , 1988, Archives of surgery.

[3]  J. Whitaker,et al.  The double stapling technique for low anterior resection. Results, modifications, and observations. , 1990, Annals of surgery.

[4]  Kenneth W. Smith,et al.  Results of 1,000 single-layer continuous polypropylene intestinal anastomoses. , 1991, American journal of surgery.

[5]  R. Heald,et al.  Leakage from stapled low anastomosis after total mesorectal excision for carcinoma of the rectum , 1994, The British journal of surgery.

[6]  A. Fingerhut,et al.  Infraperitoneal colorectal anastomosis: hand-sewn versus circular staples. A controlled clinical trial. French Associations for Surgical Research. , 1994, Surgery.

[7]  A. Fingerhut,et al.  Supraperitoneal colorectal anastomosis: hand-sewn versus circular staples--a controlled clinical trial. French Associations for Surgical Research. , 1995, Surgery.

[8]  J. Mcgregor,et al.  Comparison of Manually Constructed and Stapled Anastomoses in Colorectal Surgery , 1995, Annals of surgery.

[9]  A. Kartheuser,et al.  Use of the circular stapler in 1000 consecutive colorectal anastomoses: experience of one surgical team. , 1995, Surgery.

[10]  W. J. Hughes,et al.  Postoperative morbidity and mortality following resection of the colon and rectum for cancer , 1995, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[11]  J. Church,et al.  Factors associated with the occurrence of leaks in stapled rectal anastomoses: a review of 1,014 patients. , 1997, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[12]  H. Stein,et al.  A multivariate analysis of factors contributing to leakage of intestinal anastomoses. , 1997, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[13]  J. Church,et al.  Factors associated with the occurrence of leaks in stapled rectal anastomoses: a review of 1,014 patients , 1997 .

[14]  M. Pocard,et al.  Management of anastomotic leakage after nondiverted large bowel resection. , 1999, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[15]  R. Gamelli,et al.  The failed gastrointestinal anastomosis: an inevitable catastrophe? , 1999, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[16]  J. Bruce,et al.  Systematic review of the definition and measurement of anastomotic leak after gastrointestinal surgery , 2001, The British journal of surgery.

[17]  A. Nesbakken,et al.  Outcome and late functional results after anastomotic leakage following mesorectal excision for rectal cancer , 2001, The British journal of surgery.

[18]  M. Pocard,et al.  Factors Associated with Clinically Significant Anastomotic Leakage after Large Bowel Resection: Multivariate Analysis of 707 Patients , 2002, World Journal of Surgery.

[19]  J. Peterse,et al.  Complications after colorectal surgery without mechanical bowel preparation. , 2002, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[20]  H. Bruch,et al.  Anastomotic leakage following low anterior resection: results of a standardized diagnostic and therapeutic approach , 2004, International Journal of Colorectal Disease.

[21]  O. Dent,et al.  Anastomotic Leakage Is Predictive of Diminished Survival After Potentially Curative Resection for Colorectal Cancer , 2004, Annals of surgery.

[22]  R. Tang,et al.  Pelvic Drainage and Other Risk Factors for Leakage After Elective Anterior Resection in Rectal Cancer Patients: A Prospective Study of 978 Patients , 2005, Annals of surgery.

[23]  C. McArdle,et al.  Impact of anastomotic leakage on long‐term survival of patients undergoing curative resection for colorectal cancer , 2005, The British journal of surgery.