Computer simulation of angle-resolved x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy measurements for the study of surface and interface roughnesses

The development of nanoscale materials is always closely connected with their characterization. One powerful method of nondestructive analysis in the nanometer-depth region is angle-resolved x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (ARXPS). The interpretation of such ARXPS measurements, however, needs model calculations based on a priori assumptions of the (typically unknown) surface structure under investigation. For rough surfaces, there often can be uncertainties, misinterpretations, and/or artifacts. In this paper a calculation method is presented which allows ARXPS intensities to be simulated conveniently and rapidly for almost any sample structure. The presented algorithms can be easily extended to include other physical effects (e.g., elastic scattering) and can also be used for other problems where spatial resolution for the description of absorption processes is needed. Illustrative calculations for selected surface structures (overlayers on rough substrates, island formation, and clusters) demonstrate how these simulations can help to estimate the limits of ARXPS analyses. Some previous findings (e.g., the “magic angle” for overlayers on rough surfaces) are critically examined. For more complicated small structures (islands and clusters), a complex interplay of various parameters must be considered. For small islands, edge and shadowing effects result in a general overestimation of the surface coverage, and near-surface clusters are often interpreted as artificially mixed layers of the materials.

[1]  D. Briggs,et al.  Surface Analysis by Auger and X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy , 2003 .

[2]  K. Kern,et al.  Engineering atomic and molecular nanostructures at surfaces , 2005, Nature.

[3]  S. Oswald,et al.  Depth profile and interface analysis in the nm-range , 2005 .

[4]  J. Zemek,et al.  Angular-resolved photoelectron spectroscopy of corrugated surfaces , 2005 .

[5]  F. Yubero,et al.  Surface roughness and island formation effects in ARXPS quantification , 2004 .

[6]  R. Paynter Angle-resolved x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy studies of the evolution of plasma-treated surfaces with time , 1999 .

[7]  W. Werner,et al.  Take‐off angle and film thickness dependences of the attenuation length of X‐ray photoelectrons by a trajectory reversal method , 1990 .

[8]  C. Powell,et al.  Electron effective attenuation lengths for applications in Auger electron spectroscopy and x‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy , 2002 .

[9]  P. Zalm Overlayer corrections in XPS , 1998 .

[10]  Edward Sacher,et al.  The applicability of angle-resolved XPS to the characterization of clusters on surfaces , 2003 .

[11]  Aleksander Jablonski,et al.  The electron attenuation length revisited , 2002 .

[12]  Sven Tougaard,et al.  Algorithm for automatic x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy data processing and x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy imaging , 2005 .

[13]  R. Hübner,et al.  Quantitative ARXPS investigation of systems with ultrathin aluminium oxide layers , 2004 .

[14]  W. Werner Electron transport in solids for quantitative surface analysis , 2001 .

[15]  S. Tougaard,et al.  Practical correction procedures for elastic electron scattering effects in ARXPS , 2001 .

[16]  W. Werner Magic angle for surface roughness for intensity ratios in AES/XPS , 1995 .

[17]  D. Briggs,et al.  Handbook of x-ray and ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy , 1977 .

[18]  C. Powell,et al.  Simulation of electron spectra for surface analysis (SESSA): a novel software tool for quantitative Auger‐electron spectroscopy and X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy , 2005 .

[19]  Charles S. Fadley,et al.  Surface analysis and angular distributions in x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy , 1974 .

[20]  A. Livesey,et al.  Maximum entropy: A new approach to non‐destructive deconvolution of depth profiles from angle‐dependent XPS , 1992 .

[21]  Christian Joachim,et al.  To be nano or not to be nano? , 2005, Nature materials.

[22]  S. Tougaard Quantitative x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy: Simple algorithm to determine the amount of atoms in the outermost few nanometers , 2003 .

[23]  J. Niemantsverdriet,et al.  Surface roughness effects in quantitative XPS: magic angle for determining overlayer thickness , 1997 .

[24]  Peter J. Cumpson,et al.  Elastic Scattering Corrections in AES and XPS. II. Estimating Attenuation Lengths and Conditions Required for their Valid Use in Overlayer/Substrate Experiments , 1997 .

[25]  S. Oswald,et al.  XPS and ARXPS investigations of ultra thin TaN films deposited on SiO2 and Si , 2005 .

[26]  P. Kelly,et al.  Combined AFM and XPS analysis of complex surfaces , 2003 .

[27]  C. Hunt,et al.  Atomic mixing and electron range effects in ultrahigh‐resolution profiles of the Ta2O5/Ta interface by argon sputtering with Auger electron spectroscopy , 1984 .

[28]  W. Delgass,et al.  Surface sensitivity and angular dependence of X-ray photoelectron spectra☆ , 1973 .

[29]  J. Niemantsverdriet,et al.  Thickness determination of uniform overlayers on rough substrates by angle-dependent XPS , 1995 .

[30]  S. Hofmann Sputter depth profile analysis of interfaces , 1998 .

[31]  C. Powell,et al.  Information depth and the mean escape depth in Auger electron spectroscopy and x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy , 2003 .

[32]  P. Cumpson Elastic scattering corrections in AES and XPS: I. Two rapid Monte Carlo methods for calculating the depth distribution function , 1993 .

[33]  G. Rowlands,et al.  On determining accurate positions, separations, and internal profiles for delta layers , 2003 .

[34]  I. Bertóti,et al.  Calculation of overlayer thickness on curved surfaces based on XPS intensities , 2004 .

[35]  Peter J. Cumpson,et al.  Angle-resolved XPS and AES: depth-resolution limits and a general comparison of properties of depth-profile reconstruction methods , 1995 .

[36]  S. Oswald,et al.  Interface formation and reactions at Ta–Si and Ta–SiO2 interfaces studied by XPS and ARXPS , 2004 .

[37]  D. Briggs,et al.  Practical surface analysis: By auger and x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy , 1983 .

[38]  Harald Fuchs,et al.  Overlayer thickness determination by angular dependent X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (ADXPS) of rough surfaces with a spherical topography , 2000 .

[39]  K. Wittmaack Assessment of the extent of atomic mixing from sputtering experiments , 1982 .

[40]  J. Zemek,et al.  Escape Probability of Signal Auger and Photoelectrons from Ultrathin Overlayers , 1997 .

[41]  J. Fulghum,et al.  Quantitation of coverages on rough surfaces by XPS: An overview , 1988 .

[42]  G. Mladenov,et al.  Photoelectron signal simulation from textured samples covered by a thin film , 2001 .