Interoperability of XBRL Financial Statements in the U.S

In the wake of the global financial crisis, a pressing need exists for improving investor friendliness, especially the transparency and interoperability of the financial statements of public companies. eXtensible Business Reporting Language XBRL and XBRL taxonomies can accomplish this objective. In the U.S., the Securities and Exchange Commission SEC has mandated that all public companies must file their financial statements using XBRL and the U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles GAAP taxonomy according to a phased-in schedule. Are the XBRL-based financial statements interoperable? This question is addressed by analyzing all of the annual XBRL financial statements filed to the SEC as of February 26, 2010. On average, 63% of data elements are not comparable between a pair of statements. The incomparability is partly caused by issues related to the GAAP taxonomy and misuse of the taxonomy by companies. The results have practical implications that will help improve the quality of financial data.

[1]  Erhard Rahm,et al.  A survey of approaches to automatic schema matching , 2001, The VLDB Journal.

[2]  Hui Du,et al.  Meeting Challenges and Expectations of Continuous Auditing in the Context of Independent Audits of Financial Statements , 2007 .

[3]  Harris Wu,et al.  Quality of XBRL US GAAP Taxonomy: Empirical Evaluation Using SEC Filings , 2010, AMCIS.

[4]  Tomasz Imielinski,et al.  Mining association rules between sets of items in large databases , 1993, SIGMOD Conference.

[5]  Miklos A. Vasarhelyi,et al.  Financial Reporting in XBRL on the SEC's EDGAR System: A Critique and Evaluation , 2005, J. Inf. Syst..

[6]  Erhard Rahm,et al.  Matching large XML schemas , 2004, SGMD.

[7]  Laura M. Haas,et al.  Information integration in the enterprise , 2008, CACM.

[8]  Miklos A. Vasarhelyi,et al.  Does the Year 2000 XBRL Taxonomy Accommodate Current Business Financial-Reporting Practice? , 2002, J. Inf. Syst..

[9]  Stuart E. Madnick,et al.  Semantic Integration Approach to Efficient Business Data Supply Chain: Integration Approach to Interoperable XBRL , 2007 .

[10]  W. No,et al.  SEC's XBRL Voluntary Program on Edgar: The Case for Quality Assurance , 2008 .

[11]  Barbara Lamberton,et al.  Analysis of XBRL Literature: A Decade of Progress and Puzzle , 2010 .

[13]  Philip A. Bernstein,et al.  Industrial-strength schema matching , 2004, SGMD.

[14]  Kurt Hornik,et al.  Introduction to arules – A computational environment for mining association rules and frequent item sets , 2009 .

[15]  Won Gyun No,et al.  Auditing XBRL-Related Documents: The Case of United Technologies Corporation , 2008 .

[16]  Miklos A. Vasarhelyi,et al.  Financial Reporting and Auditing Agent with Net Knowledge (FRAANK) and eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL) , 2005, J. Inf. Syst..

[17]  S. Kothari,et al.  The Benefits of Financial Statement Comparability , 2011 .

[18]  Hongwei Zhu,et al.  Towards Quality of Data Standards: Empirical Findings from XBRL , 2009, ICIS.