Test results management and distributed cognition in electronic health record–enabled primary care

Managing abnormal test results in primary care involves coordination across various settings. This study identifies how primary care teams manage test results in a large, computerized healthcare system in order to inform health information technology requirements for test results management and other distributed healthcare services. At five US Veterans Health Administration facilities, we interviewed 37 primary care team members, including 16 primary care providers, 12 registered nurses, and 9 licensed practical nurses. We performed content analysis using a distributed cognition approach, identifying patterns of information transmission across people and artifacts (e.g. electronic health records). Results illustrate challenges (e.g. information overload) as well as strategies used to overcome challenges. Various communication paths were used. Some team members served as intermediaries, processing information before relaying it. Artifacts were used as memory aids. Health information technology should address the risks of distributed work by supporting awareness of team and task status for reliable management of results.

[1]  Hardeep Singh,et al.  The global burden of diagnostic errors in primary care , 2016, BMJ Quality & Safety.

[2]  Finn Kensing,et al.  Designing for collaborative interpretation in telemonitoring: Re-introducing patients as diagnostic agents , 2011, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[3]  D R Towill,et al.  An evolutionary approach to the architecture of effective healthcare delivery systems. , 2005, Journal of health organization and management.

[4]  R. Key Dismukes,et al.  Remembrance of Things Future: Prospective Memory in Laboratory, Workplace, and Everyday Settings , 2010 .

[5]  Brian Hazlehurst,et al.  Distributed cognition: An alternative model of cognition for medical informatics , 2008, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[6]  Yan Xiao,et al.  Teamwork and Collaboration , 2013 .

[7]  Lipika Samal,et al.  Use and satisfaction with key functions of a common commercial electronic health record: a survey of primary care providers , 2013, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making.

[8]  B. Karsh,et al.  A macro-ergonomic work system analysis of the diagnostic testing process in an outpatient health care facility for process improvement and patient safety , 2006, Ergonomics.

[9]  Robert L. Wears,et al.  Health information technology: fallacies and sober realities , 2010, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[10]  Jennie J Gallimore,et al.  Management of Test Results in Family Medicine Offices , 2009, The Annals of Family Medicine.

[11]  Hardeep Singh,et al.  Communication breakdowns and diagnostic errors: a radiology perspective , 2014, Diagnosis.

[12]  Dean F Sittig,et al.  Information overload and missed test results in electronic health record-based settings. , 2013, JAMA internal medicine.

[13]  Michael D. Reis,et al.  Types and origins of diagnostic errors in primary care settings. , 2013, JAMA internal medicine.

[14]  Guy H. Walker,et al.  What really is going on? Review of situation awareness models for individuals and teams , 2008 .

[15]  Dean F Sittig,et al.  Notifications received by primary care practitioners in electronic health records: a taxonomy and time analysis. , 2012, The American journal of medicine.

[16]  Jennifer H. Garvin,et al.  Publishing Protocols for Partnered Research , 2014, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[17]  Enrico W. Coiera,et al.  Viewpoint: When Conversation Is Better Than Computation , 2000, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[18]  Laura G Militello,et al.  Characterizing a Naturalistic Decision-Making Phenomenon , 2016, Journal of cognitive engineering and decision making.

[19]  Richard J Lilford,et al.  Test result communication in primary care: clinical and office staff perspectives , 2014, Family practice.

[20]  G. Lyratzopoulos,et al.  Measures of promptness of cancer diagnosis in primary care: secondary analysis of national audit data on patients with 18 common and rarer cancers , 2013, British Journal of Cancer.

[21]  T. Bodenheimer Coordinating care--a perilous journey through the health care system. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[22]  Greg L. Stewart,et al.  Teamwork and Delegation in Medical Homes: Primary Care Staff Perspectives in the Veterans Health Administration , 2014, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[23]  Richard J McManus,et al.  Patient perspectives on test result communication in primary care: a qualitative study. , 2015, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[24]  Henry W. W. Potts,et al.  Cognitive workload changes for nurses transitioning from a legacy system with paper documentation to a commercial electronic health record , 2015, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[25]  Johanna I Westbrook,et al.  Interruptions and multi-tasking: moving the research agenda in new directions , 2014, BMJ quality & safety.

[26]  Emily S. Patterson,et al.  Sources of variation in primary care clinical workflow: Implications for the design of cognitive support , 2014, Health Informatics J..

[27]  Ben-Tzion Karsh,et al.  The myth of standardized workflow in primary care , 2016, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[28]  Gunnar Ellingsen,et al.  A Review of 25 Years of CSCW Research in Healthcare: Contributions, Challenges and Future Agendas , 2012, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[29]  Gary Klein,et al.  Rapid Decision Making on the Fire Ground , 1986 .

[30]  Andrew Georgiou,et al.  Failure to Follow-Up Test Results for Ambulatory Patients: A Systematic Review , 2011, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[31]  David W. Bates,et al.  Health Information Technology and Care Coordination: The Next Big Opportunity for Informatics? , 2015 .

[32]  Hardeep Singh,et al.  Resilient actions in the diagnostic process and system performance , 2013, BMJ quality & safety.

[33]  Mario Plebani,et al.  The detection and prevention of errors in laboratory medicine , 2010, Annals of clinical biochemistry.

[34]  George Demiris,et al.  New era for the consumer health informatics research agenda , 2012 .

[35]  Alison B. Hamilton,et al.  Teamlet Structure and Early Experiences of Medical Home Implementation for Veterans , 2014, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[36]  Dean F. Sittig,et al.  Developing Software to “Track and Catch” Missed Follow-up of Abnormal Test Results in a Complex Sociotechnical Environment , 2013, Applied Clinical Informatics.

[37]  M.B. Aller,et al.  What do we know about patients' perceptions of continuity of care? A meta-synthesis of qualitative studies. , 2012, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[38]  Hardeep Singh,et al.  Research paper: Provider management strategies of abnormal test result alerts: a cognitive task analysis , 2010, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[39]  Edna Montgomery,et al.  Using patient traffic control to reduce treatment delays for high-risk patients at a VA hospital. , 2008, Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety.

[40]  P. Cram,et al.  Do not assume that no news is good news: test result management and communication in primary care , 2015, BMJ Quality & Safety.

[41]  Hardeep Singh,et al.  Root cause analysis reports help identify common factors in delayed diagnosis and treatment of outpatients. , 2013, Health affairs.

[42]  Hardeep Singh,et al.  Assigning responsibility to close the loop on radiology test results , 2017, Diagnosis.

[43]  Hardeep Singh,et al.  Eight recommendations for policies for communicating abnormal test results. , 2010, Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety.

[44]  Lynn Stevenson,et al.  Home care safety perspectives from clients, family members, caregivers and paid providers. , 2009, Healthcare quarterly.

[45]  Pernille Bjørn,et al.  Triage Drift: A Workplace Study in a Pediatric Emergency Department , 2008, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[46]  Andrew Georgiou,et al.  The Impact for Patient Outcomes of Failure to Follow Up on Test Results. How Can We Do Better? , 2015, EJIFCC.

[47]  Ben-Tzion Karsh,et al.  Information Chaos in Primary Care: Implications for Physician Performance and Patient Safety , 2011, The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine.

[48]  Hardeep Singh,et al.  Exploring situational awareness in diagnostic errors in primary care , 2011, BMJ quality & safety.

[49]  Ann Blandford,et al.  Understanding infusion administration in the ICU through Distributed Cognition , 2012, J. Biomed. Informatics.