An optimization-based operability framework for process design and intensification of modular natural gas utilization systems

Abstract This paper introduces a novel operability-based framework for process design and intensification of modular systems. This framework is based on nonlinear programming concepts, including bilevel optimization, and extends the application domain of classical operability approaches to process simulator runs (Aspen Plus) for obtaining the relationship between input and output spaces, in addition to first-principles models. As potential modular applications of the proposed approach, a catalytic membrane reactor (MR) for the direct methane aromatization (DMA) conversion to fuels and chemicals, and a natural gas combined cycle (NGCC) system for power generation, are addressed. These applications are especially motivated by the advent of the shale gas revolution that allowed the recent discovery of stranded shale/natural gas deposits at different shale formations in the U.S. The utilization of such deposits could be capitalized by employing modular technologies for the production of power, value-added chemicals and fuels at the site. However, the design and intensification of modular energy systems is a challenging task as these processes are represented by complex and nonlinear models. The obtained results indicate that the proposed framework has the potential to accelerate the realization of the concept of modular manufacturing with reduced footprint and maximized efficiency, resulting in future cost savings. In particular for the NGCC process, the results provide the gas and steam turbine cycle conditions that could enable modular plants that are about three orders of magnitude smaller in terms of power generation than typical operating processes.

[1]  Michael Baldea,et al.  From process integration to process intensification , 2015, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[2]  高木 祐吉,et al.  Steam Turbines , 1917, Nature.

[3]  Luis F. Domínguez,et al.  A quadratic approximation‐based algorithm for the solution of multiparametric mixed‐integer nonlinear programming problems , 2013 .

[4]  Babatunde A. Ogunnaike,et al.  Integrating systems design and control using dynamic flexibility analysis , 2007 .

[5]  Efstratios N. Pistikopoulos,et al.  AN ENERGY SYSTEMS ENGINEERING APPROACH TO POLYGENERATION AND HYDROGEN INFRASTRUCTURE SYSTEMS ANALYSIS & DESIGN , 2009 .

[6]  Marianthi G. Ierapetritou,et al.  Computational Approaches for Studying the Granular Dynamics of Continuous Blending Processes, 2 – Population Balance and Data‐Based Methods , 2012 .

[7]  S. Ranil Wickramasinghe,et al.  Process intensification with selected membrane processes , 2015 .

[8]  Christos Georgakis,et al.  Design of output constraints for model-based non-square controllers using interval operability , 2008 .

[9]  Réjean Samson,et al.  Multi-objective design optimization of a natural gas-combined cycle with carbon dioxide capture in a life cycle perspective , 2010 .

[10]  Marcus Grünewald,et al.  Transformable Production Concepts: Flexible, Mobile, Decentralized, Modular, Fast , 2016 .

[11]  James B. Rawlings,et al.  Chemical Reactor Analysis and Design Fundamentals , 2002 .

[12]  Christos Georgakis,et al.  Input–output operability of control systems: The steady-state case , 2010 .

[13]  Patrice Marcotte,et al.  An overview of bilevel optimization , 2007, Ann. Oper. Res..

[14]  C. Ramshaw,et al.  Process analysis of intensified absorber for post-combustion CO2 capture through modelling and simulation , 2014 .

[15]  Frank Kreith,et al.  Handbook of energy efficiency and renewable energy , 2007 .

[16]  Richard C. Baliban,et al.  Toward Novel Hybrid Biomass, Coal, and Natural Gas Processes for Satisfying Current Transportation Fuel Demands, 1: Process Alternatives, Gasification Modeling, Process Simulation, and Economic Analysis , 2010 .

[17]  G. Anandalingam,et al.  Genetic algorithm based approach to bi-level linear programming , 1994 .

[18]  Efstratios N. Pistikopoulos,et al.  Optimization and Control of Pressure Swing Adsorption Processes Under Uncertainty , 2013 .

[19]  Fernando V. Lima,et al.  Novel operability-based approach for process design and intensification: Application to a membrane reactor for direct methane aromatization , 2017 .

[20]  Juan I. Manassaldi,et al.  Optimal Design and Operating Conditions of an Integrated Plant Using a Natural Gas Combined Cycle and Postcombustion CO2 Capture , 2014 .

[21]  David R. Vinson,et al.  On the operability of continuous processes , 2001 .

[22]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  Finding optimal strategies in a multi-period multi-leader-follower Stackelberg game using an evolutionary algorithm , 2013, Comput. Oper. Res..

[23]  Christodoulos A. Floudas,et al.  Novel Natural Gas to Liquids Processes: Process Synthesis and Global Optimization Strategies , 2013 .

[24]  Christos Georgakis,et al.  Operability‐based determination of feasible control constraints for several high‐dimensional nonsquare industrial processes , 2010 .

[25]  E. Iglesia,et al.  Design and optimization of catalysts and membrane reactors for the non-oxidative conversion of methane , 2002 .

[26]  Marianthi G. Ierapetritou,et al.  Similarities and Differences Between the Concepts of Operability and Flexibility: The Steady-State Case , 2009 .

[27]  R. Kehlhofer,et al.  Combined-cycle gas and steam turbine power plants. 2. edition , 1991 .

[28]  Richard C. Baliban,et al.  Toward Novel Hybrid Biomass, Coal, and Natural Gas Processes for Satisfying Current Transportation Fuel Demands, 2: Simultaneous Heat and Power Integration , 2010 .

[29]  F. Lima,et al.  OPERABILITY-BASED APPROACH FOR PROCESS DESIGN , INTENSIFICATION , AND CONTROL : APPLICATION TO HIGH-DIMENSIONAL AND NONLINEAR MEMBRANE REACTORS , 2016 .

[30]  A. I. Stankiewicz,et al.  Process Intensification: Transforming Chemical Engineering , 2000 .

[31]  Enrico Drioli,et al.  Membrane engineering in process intensificationAn overview , 2011 .

[32]  Jonathan F. Bard,et al.  Practical Bilevel Optimization: Algorithms and Applications , 1998 .

[33]  Rahul Anantharaman,et al.  Design and off-design analyses of a pre-combustion CO2 capture process in a natural gas combined cycle power plant , 2009 .

[34]  J. Warner,et al.  Combined - Cycle Gas & Steam Turbine Power Plants , 1999 .

[35]  A. Frantsev,et al.  Finding Optimal Strategies in Multi-Period Stackelberg Games Using an Evolutionary Framework , 2012 .

[36]  Marcus Grünewald,et al.  Potential analysis model for case specific quantification of the degree of eligibility of innovative production concepts in the process industry , 2015 .

[37]  Alexander Zoelle,et al.  Cost and Performance Baseline for Fossil Energy Plants Volume 1: Bituminous Coal and Natural Gas to Electricity , 2019 .

[38]  Jeonghwa Moon,et al.  Integrated Design and Control under Uncertainty-Algorithms and Applications , 2009 .

[39]  E. Drioli,et al.  Process Intensification by Membrane Reactors: High‐Temperature Water Gas Shift Reaction as Single Stage for Syngas Upgrading , 2012 .

[40]  T. Gerven,et al.  Comparison of photocatalytic space-time yields of 12 reactor designs for wastewater treatment , 2015 .

[41]  Hanne M. Kvamsdal,et al.  Maintaining a neutral water balance in a 450 MWe NGCC-CCS power system with post-combustion carbon dioxide capture aimed at offshore operation , 2010 .

[44]  Meihong Wang,et al.  Modelling and simulation of intensified absorber for post-combustion CO2 capture using different mass transfer correlations , 2015 .

[45]  Andreas A. Linninger,et al.  Integrated design and control under uncertainty: Embedded control optimization for plantwide processes , 2011, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[46]  Mikhail Zhizhin,et al.  A Fifteen Year Record of Global Natural Gas Flaring Derived from Satellite Data , 2009 .

[47]  Stephen E. Zitney,et al.  A Dynamic Process Model of a Natural Gas Combined Cycle: Model Development With Startup and Shutdown Simulations , 2013 .

[48]  Giorgio Locatelli,et al.  Small modular reactors: A comprehensive overview of their economics and strategic aspects , 2014 .

[49]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  Test Problem Construction for Single-Objective Bilevel Optimization , 2014, Evolutionary Computation.

[50]  C. Georgakis,et al.  On the Calculation of Operability Sets of Nonlinear High-Dimensional Processes , 2010 .

[51]  On the attainable region for process networks , 2014 .

[52]  Lora L Pinkerton,et al.  Cost and Performance Baseline for Fossil Energy Plants Volume 1a: Bituminous Coal (PC) and Natural Gas to Electricity Revision 3 , 2011 .

[53]  Andreas A. Linninger,et al.  Embedded Control for Optimizing Flexible Dynamic Process Performance , 2011 .

[54]  Marianthi G. Ierapetritou,et al.  Design Space of Pharmaceutical Processes Using Data-Driven-Based Methods , 2010, Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation.

[55]  Christodoulos A. Floudas,et al.  Global optimization of a MINLP process synthesis model for thermochemical based conversion of hybrid coal, biomass, and natural gas to liquid fuels , 2012, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[56]  Kajal Mukherjee,et al.  Current and Future Technologies for Natural Gas Combined Cycle (NGCC) Power Plants , 2013 .

[57]  Christos Georgakis,et al.  A new measure of process output controllability , 1998 .

[58]  Marianthi G. Ierapetritou,et al.  Feasibility analysis of black-box processes using an adaptive sampling Kriging-based method , 2012, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[59]  Thomas A. Adams,et al.  High-efficiency power production from natural gas with carbon capture , 2010 .

[60]  Yafeng Yin,et al.  Genetic-Algorithms-Based Approach for Bilevel Programming Models , 2000 .

[61]  Meihong Wang,et al.  Process intensification for post-combustion CO2 capture with chemical absorption: A critical review , 2015 .