Attentional focus, processing load, and Stroop interference

Although the effects of attentional focus and perceptual load on selective attention when targets and distractors are distinct objects that occupy separate locations are well known, there has been little examination of their role when both relevant and irrelevant information pertains to the same object. In four experiments, participants were shown Stroop color words or strings of letters in a task of speeded color identification. When the participants’ attentional focus was manipulated via cue validity or precue size, greater Stroop interference was observed when the attentional focus was narrow than when it was broad. However, when the participants were induced to adopt a comparable attentional focus in a dual-task paradigm, the differential Stroop interference was eliminated. Furthermore, contrary to the prediction of the perceptual load hypothesis, different levels of processing load did not lead to differential Stroop interference. These results emphasize the importance of stimulus structure in understanding distractor processing. They indicate that when relevant and irrelevant information pertains to the same object, narrowing attentional focus increases distractor processing, and perceptual load has a negligible effect on the extent of distractor processing.

[1]  Joseph S. Lappin,et al.  Does prior knowledge facilitate the detection of visual targets in random noise? , 1976 .

[2]  A. Kramer,et al.  Perceptual organization and focused attention: The role of objects and proximity in visual processing , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[3]  Visual attention is no faster than the eyes. , 2001 .

[4]  J. Duncan Selective attention and the organization of visual information , 1984 .

[5]  Jeff F. Miller The flanker compatibility effect as a function of visual angle, attentional focus, visual transients, and perceptual load: A search for boundary conditions , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[6]  M. Posner,et al.  Attention and the detection of signals. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology.

[7]  S. Yantis,et al.  Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: voluntary versus automatic allocation. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  C. Frith,et al.  The Role of Working Memory in Visual Selective Attention , 2001, Science.

[9]  P L Yee,et al.  Individual differences in Stroop dilution: tests of the attention-capture hypothesis. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  E. Neumann,et al.  A time course analysis of Stroop interference and facilitation: comparing normal individuals and individuals with schizophrenia. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[11]  P. M. Nealis The Stroop Phenomenon: Some Critical Tests of the Response Competition Hypothesis , 1973, Perceptual and motor skills.

[12]  N. Lavie Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  C D Frith,et al.  Modulating irrelevant motion perception by varying attentional load in an unrelated task. , 1997, Science.

[14]  James T. Townsend,et al.  A note on the identifiability of parallel and serial processes , 1971 .

[15]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Tests of the automaticity of reading: dilution of Stroop effects by color-irrelevant stimuli. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[16]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  On the locus of visual selection: evidence from focused attention tasks , 1990 .

[17]  G. Baylis,et al.  Movement and visual attention: the spotlight metaphor breaks down. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  M. Posner,et al.  Components of visual orienting , 1984 .

[19]  R. D. Edsell,et al.  Anxiety as a function of environmental noise and social interaction. , 1976, The Journal of psychology.

[20]  W. R. Garner,et al.  The Stimulus in Information Processing , 1970 .

[21]  W. R. Garner,et al.  Integrality of stimulus dimensions in various types of information processing , 1970 .

[22]  P. Panek,et al.  Locus of the age-Stroop interference relationship. , 1984 .

[23]  J. Stroop Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. , 1992 .

[24]  J. Mcdowd,et al.  Aging, inhibitory processes, and negative priming. , 1991, Journal of gerontology.

[25]  C W Eriksen,et al.  Information processing in visual search: A continuous flow conception and experimental results , 1979, Perception & psychophysics.

[26]  Joyce L. Sichel,et al.  The color-word interference test: The effects of varied color-word combinations upon verbal response latency. , 1969 .

[27]  H. Egeth,et al.  Failure of spatial selectivity in vision , 1978 .

[28]  S. Yantis,et al.  Mechanisms of attentional selection: Temporally modulated priority tags , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[29]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Attentional distribution in the visual field duringsame-different judgments as assessed by response competition , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[30]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task , 1974 .

[31]  Colin M. Macleod Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review. , 1991, Psychological bulletin.

[32]  L. Paquet,et al.  Evidence for selective target processing with a low perceptual load flankers task , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[33]  Charles Curtis Eriksen,et al.  The extent of processing of noise elements during selective encoding from visual displays , 1973 .

[34]  D. C. Bradford,et al.  Age-related decrements in Stroop Color Test performance. , 1984, Journal of clinical psychology.

[35]  W. R. Garner,et al.  Filtering and condensation tasks with integral and separable dimensions , 1975 .

[36]  Gunther W. Balz,et al.  The Effect of Attentional Spread on Spatial Resolution , 1997, Vision Research.

[37]  D. LaBerge,et al.  Variations in size of the visual field in which targets are presented: An attentional range effect , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[38]  W. O. Shaffer,et al.  Attending to forty-nine spatial positions at once. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[39]  S. Yantis,et al.  Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Evidence from visual search. , 1984 .

[40]  N Lavie,et al.  The role of perceptual load in negative priming. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[41]  M. Posner,et al.  Attention and cognitive control. , 1975 .

[42]  Geoffrey F. Woodman,et al.  Electrophysiological measurement of rapid shifts of attention during visual search , 1999, Nature.

[43]  N. Lavie,et al.  On the Efficiency of Visual Selective Attention: Efficient Visual Search Leads to Inefficient Distractor Rejection , 1997 .

[44]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[45]  R. Becklen,et al.  Selective looking with minimal eye movements , 1976 .

[46]  D. LaBerge,et al.  Reducing the effects of adjacent distractors by narrowing attention. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[47]  J. Beck,et al.  The effects of concentrated and distributed attention on peripheral acuity , 1973 .

[48]  James L. McClelland,et al.  On the control of automatic processes: a parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect. , 1990, Psychological review.

[49]  Y. Tsal,et al.  Perceptual load as a major determinant of the locus of selection in visual attention , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[50]  G R Mangun,et al.  Attention and spatial selection: Electrophysiological evidence for modulation by perceptual load , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[51]  John Morton,et al.  Selective Attention to Words and Colours , 1973 .

[52]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[53]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Sustained and transient components of focal visual attention , 1989, Vision Research.

[54]  A. Hartley,et al.  Evidence for the selective preservation of spatial selective attention in old age. , 1993, Psychology and aging.

[55]  F. N. Dempster,et al.  The rise and fall of the inhibitory mechanism: Toward a unified theory of cognitive development and aging , 1992 .

[56]  Howard E. Egeth,et al.  Attention and Preattention , 1977 .

[57]  G. Baylis,et al.  Visual parsing and response competition: The effect of grouping factors , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[58]  Thomas Schulz Components of the reaction time stroop-task , 1979 .

[59]  J Miller,et al.  Priming is not necessary for selective-attention failures: Semantic effects of unattended, unprimed letters , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[60]  W. R. Garner The Processing of Information and Structure , 1974 .

[61]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[62]  Burkhart Fischer,et al.  THE ROLE OF ATTENTION IN THE PREPARATION OF VISUALLY GUIDED SACCADIC EYE MOVEMENTS IN MAN , 1987 .

[63]  Allison G. McGrath,et al.  Cuing Interacts with Perceptual Load in Visual Search , 2002, Psychological science.

[64]  D. Algom,et al.  Stroop and Garner effects in and out of Posner's beam: reconciling two conceptions of selective attention. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[65]  W. Glaser,et al.  Time course analysis of the Stroop phenomenon. , 1982 .

[66]  L Harms,et al.  Color segregation and selective attention in a nonsearch task , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[67]  U. Neisser,et al.  Selective looking: Attending to visually specified events , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[68]  Nilli Lavie,et al.  Selective attention and cognitive control: dissociating attentional functions through different types of load , 1998 .

[69]  Colin M. Macleod,et al.  Presenting two incongruent color words on a single trial does not alter Stroop interference , 1998, Memory & cognition.