Adaptive Thresholding of Functional Connectivity Networks for fMRI-Based Brain Disease Analysis

Functional connectivity (FC) networks based on functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data have been widely applied to automated identification of brain diseases, such as attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and Alzheimer’s disease (AD). To generate compact representations of FC networks for disease analysis, various thresholding strategies have been developed for analyzing brain FC networks. However, existing studies typically employ predefined values or percentages of connections to threshold the whole FC networks, thus ignoring the diversity of temporal correlations (particularly strong correlations) among different brain regions. In addition, in practice, it is usually very challenging to decide the optimal threshold or connection percentage in FC network analysis. To address these problems, in this paper, we propose a weight distribution based thresholding (WDT) method for FC network analysis with resting-state function MRI data. Specifically, for FC between a pair of brain regions, we calculate its optimal threshold value by using the weight (i.e., temporal correlation) distributions of the FC across two subject groups (i.e., patient and normal groups). The proposed WDT method can adaptively yields FC-specific thresholds, thus preserving the diversity information of FCs among different brain regions. Experiment results on both ADNI and ADHD-200 datasets with rs-fMRI data demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed WDT method.

[1]  Daniel L. Rubin,et al.  Network Analysis of Intrinsic Functional Brain Connectivity in Alzheimer's Disease , 2008, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[2]  A. Fagan,et al.  Functional connectivity and graph theory in preclinical Alzheimer's disease , 2014, Neurobiology of Aging.

[3]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  THE HUMAN CONNECTOME: A COMPLEX NETWORK , 2011, Schizophrenia Research.

[4]  Paul J Laurienti,et al.  Analyzing complex functional brain networks: Fusing statistics and network science to understand the brain*† , 2013, Statistics surveys.

[5]  N. Tzourio-Mazoyer,et al.  Automated Anatomical Labeling of Activations in SPM Using a Macroscopic Anatomical Parcellation of the MNI MRI Single-Subject Brain , 2002, NeuroImage.

[6]  Wietske van der Zwaag,et al.  Ultra-high field MRI: Advancing systems neuroscience towards mesoscopic human brain function , 2017, NeuroImage.

[7]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Complex network measures of brain connectivity: Uses and interpretations , 2010, NeuroImage.

[8]  O. Sporns,et al.  Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems , 2009, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[9]  Daoqiang Zhang,et al.  Sub-Network Kernels for Measuring Similarity of Brain Connectivity Networks in Disease Diagnosis , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[10]  Dustin Scheinost,et al.  The (in)stability of functional brain network measures across thresholds , 2015, NeuroImage.

[11]  C. Stam,et al.  Alzheimer's disease: connecting findings from graph theoretical studies of brain networks , 2013, Neurobiology of Aging.