Integrated assessment of pedestrian head impact protection in testing secondary safety and autonomous emergency braking.

Pedestrian impact testing is used to provide information to the public about the relative level of protection provided by different vehicles to a struck pedestrian. Autonomous Emergency Braking (AEB) is a relatively new technology that aims to reduce the impact speed of such crashes. It is expected that vehicles with AEB will pose less harm to pedestrians, and that the benefit will come about through reductions in the number of collisions and a change in the severity of impacts that will still occur. In this paper, an integration of the assessment of AEB performance and impact performance is proposed based on average injury risk. Average injury risk is calculated using the result of an impact test and a previously published distribution of real world crash speeds. A second published speed distribution is used that accounts for the effects of AEB, and reduced average risks are implied. This principle allows the effects of AEB systems and secondary safety performance to be integrated into a single measure of safety. The results are used to examine the effect of AEB on Euro NCAP and ANCAP assessments using previously published results on the likely effect of AEB. The results show that, given certain assumptions about AEB performance, the addition of AEB is approximately the equivalent of increasing Euro NCAP test performance by one band, which corresponds to an increase in the score of 25% of the maximum.

[1]  Kristofer D. Kusano,et al.  Potential Occupant Injury Reduction in Pre-Crash System Equipped Vehicles in the Striking Vehicle of Rear-end Crashes. , 2010, Annals of advances in automotive medicine. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine. Annual Scientific Conference.

[2]  Matthew Avery,et al.  Autonomous Emergency Braking Test Results , 2013 .

[3]  Kip Smith,et al.  Pedestrian injury mitigation by autonomous braking. , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[4]  Johnny Korner,et al.  A Method for Evaluating Occupant Protection by Correlating Accident Data with Laboratory Test Data , 1989 .

[5]  J. A. Searle,et al.  The Variation of Human Tolerance to Impact and Its Effect on the Design and Testing of Automotive Impact Performance , 1978 .

[6]  T Paul Hutchinson,et al.  Pedestrian Headform Testing: Inferring Performance at Impact Speeds and for Headform Masses Not Tested, and Estimating Average Performance in a Range of Real-World Conditions , 2012, Traffic injury prevention.

[7]  Timothy Paul Hutchinson,et al.  Integrating the assessment of pedestrian safety in vehicles with collision detection and mitigation systems , 2012 .

[8]  Denis P. Wood,et al.  Pedestrian and Cyclist Impact: A Biomechanical Perspective , 2009 .

[9]  Robert W G Anderson,et al.  From crash test speed to performance in real world conditions: a conceptual model and its application to underhood clearance in pedestrian head tests. , 2012, Stapp car crash journal.

[10]  Robert Anderson,et al.  The effect of impact speed on the HIC obtained in pedestrian headform tests , 2012 .

[11]  J D Horsch,et al.  EVALUATION OF OCCUPANT PROTECTION FROM RESPONSES MEASURED IN LABORATORY TESTS. RESTRAINT TECHNOLOGIES: FRONT SEAT OCCUPANT PROTECTION. AN INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS AND EXPOSITION, DETROIT, MICHIGAN, USA, FEBRUARY 23-27 1987 , 1987 .