Human-Centered E-Business System Development Framework

This chapter builds on the foundations laid down in the previous chapter. It describes the human-centered e-business system development framework for multi-agent e-business systems based on human-centered criteria outlined in the first chapter and the pragmatic considerations and enabling theories discussed in chapter 3, which contribute towards realization of those criteria. The human-centered framework is described in terms of four components, namely, activity-centered e-business analysis, problem solving ontology, transformation agent, and multimedia interpretation, respectively. The three human-centered criteria are used as guidelines for development of the human-centered framework. The pragmatic considerations and contributing theories are used to develop the structure and content, or knowledge base, of the four components. The structure and content are described at the conceptual and computational (transformation agents) level. We start this chapter by describing the external and internal planes of human interaction which underpin the development of the human-centered framework. We follow it with the description of two components of the human-centered e-business system development framework, namely, activity-centered e-business analysis and problem solving ontology. In the next chapter we continue with the description of the problem solving ontology component and describe two other components, namely, the transformation agent and multimedia interpretation component. These four components have been used to define the external and internal planes of human interaction with the environment.

[1]  Luc Steels,et al.  Components of Expertise , 1990, AI Mag..

[2]  Bob J. Wielinga,et al.  KADS: a modelling approach to knowledge engineering , 1992 .

[3]  Dieter Fensel,et al.  MLPM: Defining a Semantics and Axiomatization for Specifying the Reasoning Process of Knowleged-based Systems , 1996, ECAI.

[4]  Balakrishnan Chandrasekaran,et al.  The Ontology of Tasks and Methods , 1997 .

[5]  Luc Steels,et al.  Learning in second generation expert systems , 1986 .

[6]  Dieter Fensel The Tower-of-Adapter Method for Developing and Reusing Problem-Solving Methods , 1997, EKAW.

[7]  S. S. Stevens On the psychophysical law. , 1957, Psychological review.

[8]  John McDermott,et al.  Preliminary steps toward a taxonomy of problem-solving methods , 1993 .

[9]  B. Chandrasekaran,et al.  Towards a Taxonomy of Problem Solving Types , 1983, AI Mag..

[10]  William J. Clancey,et al.  Heuristic Classification , 1986, Artif. Intell..

[11]  Nancy Martin,et al.  Knowledge-Based Problem Solving , 1986, IEEE Expert.

[12]  Todd R. Johnson,et al.  Generic tasks and task structures: history, critique and new directions , 1993 .

[13]  Peter E. Hart Artificial Intelligence in Transition , 1984, AI Mag..

[14]  Larry Eshelman,et al.  MOLE: A Knowledge-Acquisition Tool for Cover-and-Differentiate Systems , 1988 .

[15]  Sandra Marcus,et al.  Automating Knowledge Acquisition for Expert Systems , 1988 .

[16]  Mark T. Maybury,et al.  Intelligent multimedia interfaces , 1994, CHI Conference Companion.

[17]  Luc Steels,et al.  Second-Generation Expert Systems , 1985, IEEE Expert.