An animal model for assessment of heat distribution and neural damage around the endo shears coagulation device-applications for laparoscopic nerve-sparing surgery.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Current urologic laparoscopic procedures include preservation of locoregional nerve fibers. The use of electrical coagulation is limited because of tissue conductance of current and heat production. While ultrasonic coagulation does not use electricity, heat is still produced. We designed an animal model to characterize the heat spread around ultrasonic devices and assess whether it is neurodestructive. MATERIALS AND METHODS 10 rats were anesthetized; their skin was reflected, exposing the muscles. An ultrasonic probe was introduced into the tissue, and coagulation was performed for 10 seconds. Tissue temperature was measured using four thermocouples, at distances of 4, 8, 12, and 16 mm from the probes and in a circumferential manner. Thermal mapping of the probes was performed with an infrared camera. Further, four rats were anesthetized; the skin above their inner thighs was reflected bilaterally exposing the "nervus ischiadicus." Coagulation was performed in varying distances from the nerve on one side while the other served as control. One week later, the animals were sacrificed, and the nerves were obtained. Silver staining was used to assess the vitality of the axons. RESULTS In distances of 4 to 8 mm from the device, temperatures as high as 81°C were recorded, and silver staining showed severe axonal damage. CONCLUSIONS Although ultrasonic coagulation is efficient, local heat production may reach neurodestructive levels with a typical tissue distribution pattern. These features should be addressed during laparoscopic dissection and when considering nerve-sparing procedures.

[1]  J. Stolzenburg,et al.  Nerve‐sparing endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy , 2008, BJU international.

[2]  A. Patriciu,et al.  Nerve sparing radical prostatectomy: effects of hemostatic energy sources on the recovery of cavernous nerve function in a canine model. , 2004, The Journal of urology.

[3]  S. Patankar,et al.  Current Status of Laparoscopic Resection for Colorectal Cancer , 2004, Journal of clinical gastroenterology.

[4]  Chandru Sundaram,et al.  Evaluation of a vessel sealing system, bipolar electrosurgery, harmonic scalpel, titanium clips, endoscopic gastrointestinal anastomosis vascular staples and sutures for arterial and venous ligation in a porcine model. , 2003, The Journal of urology.

[5]  M. Meng,et al.  Laparoscopic linear cutting stapler failure. , 2002, Urology.

[6]  G. Bartsch,et al.  Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection: description of the nerve-sparing technique. , 2002, Urology.

[7]  T. Higami,et al.  Histologic and physiologic evaluation of skeletonized internal thoracic artery harvesting with an ultrasonic scalpel. , 2000, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[8]  R. Clayman,et al.  Laparoscopic lower urinary tract reconstruction , 2000, World Journal of Urology.

[9]  S. Schwaitzberg,et al.  Comparison of coagulation modalities in surgery. , 1998, Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A.

[10]  M. Pollock,et al.  Chapter 21 Nerve thermal injury , 1998 .

[11]  J. Palou,et al.  It's like a pain in the ... perineum: a surgical clip protruding into the urethra through the urethrovesical anastomosis after radical prostatectomy. , 1997, Scandinavian journal of urology and nephrology.

[12]  J. F. Magee,et al.  Proximity injury by the ultrasonically activated scalpel during dissection. , 1997, Journal of pediatric surgery.

[13]  J. Amaral,et al.  Laparosonic coagulating shears: alternative method of hemostatic control of unsupported tissue. , 1996, Journal of endourology.

[14]  M. Pollock,et al.  Experimental nerve thermal injury. , 1994, Brain : a journal of neurology.