The origin of allometric scaling laws in biology from genomes to ecosystems: towards a quantitative unifying theory of biological structure and organization

SUMMARY Life is the most complex physical phenomenon in the Universe, manifesting an extraordinary diversity of form and function over an enormous scale from the largest animals and plants to the smallest microbes and subcellular units. Despite this many of its most fundamental and complex phenomena scale with size in a surprisingly simple fashion. For example, metabolic rate scales as the 3/4-power of mass over 27 orders of magnitude, from molecular and intracellular levels up to the largest organisms. Similarly, time-scales (such as lifespans and growth rates) and sizes (such as bacterial genome lengths, tree heights and mitochondrial densities) scale with exponents that are typically simple powers of 1/4. The universality and simplicity of these relationships suggest that fundamental universal principles underly much of the coarse-grained generic structure and organisation of living systems. We have proposed a set of principles based on the observation that almost all life is sustained by hierarchical branching networks, which we assume have invariant terminal units, are space-filling and are optimised by the process of natural selection. We show how these general constraints explain quarter power scaling and lead to a quantitative, predictive theory that captures many of the essential features of diverse biological systems. Examples considered include animal circulatory systems, plant vascular systems, growth, mitochondrial densities, and the concept of a universal molecular clock. Temperature considerations, dimensionality and the role of invariants are discussed. Criticisms and controversies associated with this approach are also addressed.

[1]  M. Kleiber Body size and metabolism , 1932 .

[2]  P. F. Scholander,et al.  Body insulation of some arctic and tropical mammals and birds. , 1950, The Biological bulletin.

[3]  A. Hodgkin,et al.  The dual effect of membrane potential on sodium conductance in the giant axon of Loligo , 1952, The Journal of physiology.

[4]  P. F. Scholander,et al.  Counter-current vascular heat exchange in the fins of whales. , 1955, Journal of applied physiology.

[5]  F. T. Jung The Fire of Life , 1962 .

[6]  J. Leech,et al.  Classical Dynamics of Particles and Systems , 1966 .

[7]  C. H. Greenewalt The Flight of Birds: The Significant Dimensions, Their Departure from the Requirements for Dimensional Similarity, and the Effect on Flight Aerodynamics of That Departure , 1975 .

[8]  R. A. Mann,et al.  The Classical Dynamics of Particles , 1975 .

[9]  Benoit B. Mandelbrot,et al.  Fractal Geometry of Nature , 1984 .

[10]  W. Calder,et al.  Body Size, Physiological Time, and Longevity of Homeothermic Animals , 1981, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[11]  A. Heusner Energy metabolism and body size. I. Is the 0.75 mass exponent of Kleiber's equation a statistical artifact? , 1982, Respiration physiology.

[12]  H. Feldman,et al.  The 3/4 mass exponent for energy metabolism is not a statistical artifact. , 1983, Respiration physiology.

[13]  R. Peters The Ecological Implications of Body Size , 1983 .

[14]  Robert Brown On Size and Life , 1985, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[15]  Y. Fung,et al.  Mechanics of the Circulation , 2011, Developments in Cardiovascular Medicine.

[16]  H. Hoppeler,et al.  Matching O2 delivery to O2 demand in muscle: II. Allometric variation in energy demand. , 1988, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[17]  W. Calder Size, Function, and Life History , 1988 .

[18]  C. R. Taylor,et al.  The concept of symmorphosis: a testable hypothesis of structure-function relationship. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  P. Klinkhamer Plant allometry: The scaling of form and process , 1995 .

[20]  James H. Brown,et al.  A General Model for the Origin of Allometric Scaling Laws in Biology , 1997, Science.

[21]  S. Vogel,et al.  Life in Moving Fluids , 2020 .

[22]  James H. Brown,et al.  The fourth dimension of life: fractal geometry and allometric scaling of organisms. , 1999, Science.

[23]  James H. Brown,et al.  A general model for the structure and allometry of plant vascular systems , 1999, Nature.

[24]  M. Zamir On fractal properties of arterial trees. , 1999, Journal of theoretical biology.

[25]  Amos Maritan,et al.  Size and form in efficient transportation networks , 1999, Nature.

[26]  James H. Brown,et al.  Allometric scaling of production and life-history variation in vascular plants , 1999, Nature.

[27]  K. Nagy,et al.  Energetics of free-ranging mammals, reptiles, and birds. , 1999, Annual review of nutrition.

[28]  James H. Brown,et al.  Effects of Size and Temperature on Metabolic Rate , 2001, Science.

[29]  James H. Brown,et al.  A general model for ontogenetic growth , 2001, Nature.

[30]  Karl J. Niklas,et al.  Invariant scaling relations across tree-dominated communities , 2001, Nature.

[31]  J. Weitz,et al.  Re-examination of the "3/4-law" of metabolism. , 2000, Journal of theoretical biology.

[32]  Geoffrey B. West,et al.  Ontogenetic growth (Communication arising): Modelling universality and scaling , 2002, Nature.

[33]  James H. Brown,et al.  Effects of size and temperature on developmental time , 2002, Nature.

[34]  James H Brown,et al.  Allometric scaling of metabolic rate from molecules and mitochondria to cells and mammals , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  Raul K. Suarez,et al.  Allometric cascade as a unifying principle of body mass effects on metabolism , 2002, Nature.

[36]  Andrea Rinaldo,et al.  Ontogenetic growth: Modelling universality and scaling. , 2002, Nature.

[37]  Ethan P. White,et al.  Thermodynamic and metabolic effects on the scaling of production and population energy use , 2003 .

[38]  Pier Paolo Delsanto,et al.  Does tumor growth follow a "universal law"? , 2003, Journal of theoretical biology.

[39]  C. R. White,et al.  Mammalian basal metabolic rate is proportional to body mass2/3 , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[40]  Geoffrey B. West,et al.  Physiology (communication arising): Why does metabolic rate scale with body size? , 2003, Nature.

[41]  Geoffrey B. West,et al.  Effects of Body Size and Temperature on Population Growth , 2004, The American Naturalist.

[42]  J. Childress,et al.  Metabolic scaling: a many-splendoured thing. , 2004, Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Part B, Biochemistry & molecular biology.

[43]  Ewald R. Weibel,et al.  Allometric scaling of maximal metabolic rate in mammals: muscle aerobic capacity as determinant factor , 2004, Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology.

[44]  Geoffrey B. West,et al.  Life's Universal Scaling Laws , 2004 .

[45]  A. J. Hulbert,et al.  Respiration rate of hepatocytes varies with body mass in birds , 2004, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[46]  Geoffrey B. West,et al.  The predominance of quarter-power scaling in biology , 2004 .

[47]  James H. Brown,et al.  Linking the global carbon cycle to individual metabolism , 2005 .

[48]  James H. Brown,et al.  The rate of DNA evolution: effects of body size and temperature on the molecular clock. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[49]  T. Fenchel,et al.  Bioenergetics and Growth , 2022 .