A machine learning approach for monitoring ship safety in extreme weather events

Abstract Extreme weather events can result in loss of life, environmental pollution and major damage to vessels caught in their path. Many methods to characterise this risk have been proposed, however, they typically utilise deterministic thresholds of wind and wave limits which might not accurately reflect risk. To address this limitation, we investigate the potential of machine learning algorithms to quantify the relative likelihood of an incident during the US Atlantic hurricane season. By training an algorithm on vessel traffic, weather and historical casualty data, accident candidates can be identified from historic vessel tracks. Amongst the various methods tested, Support Vector Machines showed good performance with Recall at 95% and Accuracy reaching 92%. Finally, we implement the developed model using a case study of Hurricane Matthew (October 2016). Our method contributes to enhancements in maritime safety by enabling machine intelligent risk-aware ship routing and monitoring of vessel transits by Coastguard agencies.

[1]  Vojislav Kecman,et al.  Support Vector Machines – An Introduction , 2005 .

[2]  Jason R. W. Merrick,et al.  Self healing databases for predictive risk analytics in safety-critical systems , 2020 .

[3]  Floris Goerlandt,et al.  On the Reliability and Validity of Ship–Ship Collision Risk Analysis in Light of Different Perspectives on Risk , 2014 .

[4]  Maria Hänninen,et al.  Bayesian networks for maritime traffic accident prevention: benefits and challenges. , 2014, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[5]  Zhen-hua Shen,et al.  Model of speed optimization of oil tanker with irregular winds and waves for given route , 2018, Ocean Engineering.

[6]  Lin Liu,et al.  Predicting Future Driving Risk of Crash-Involved Drivers Based on a Systematic Machine Learning Framework , 2019, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[7]  Jakub Montewka,et al.  On a systematic perspective on risk for formal safety assessment (FSA) , 2014, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[8]  Sabine Knapp,et al.  Evaluation of safety and environmental risk at individual ship and company level , 2012 .

[9]  Zbigniew Pietrzykowski,et al.  The Ship Domain : A Criterion of Navigational Safety Assessment in an Open Sea Area , 2009 .

[10]  Giuliana Pallotta,et al.  Maritime Traffic Networks: From Historical Positioning Data to Unsupervised Maritime Traffic Monitoring , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[11]  Yasser M. K. Omar,et al.  Predicting Drug Interaction With Adenosine Receptors Using Machine Learning and SMOTE Techniques , 2019, IEEE Access.

[12]  Zahir Irani,et al.  A decision support system for vessel speed decision in maritime logistics using weather archive big data , 2017, Comput. Oper. Res..

[13]  Manel Grifoll,et al.  Ship weather routing using pathfinding algorithms: the case of Barcelona – Palma de Mallorca , 2018 .

[14]  Pedro Antão,et al.  Analysis of the influence of human errors on the occurrence of coastal ship accidents in different wave conditions using Bayesian Belief Networks. , 2019, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[15]  Richard O. Lane,et al.  Maritime anomaly detection and threat assessment , 2010, 2010 13th International Conference on Information Fusion.

[16]  Xiao‐Ming Li,et al.  Global ship accidents and ocean swell-related sea states , 2017 .

[17]  Wei Wang,et al.  Using support vector machine models for crash injury severity analysis. , 2012, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[18]  Yoshua Bengio,et al.  Random Search for Hyper-Parameter Optimization , 2012, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[19]  Kum Fai Yuen,et al.  Oil tanker risks on the marine environment: An empirical study and policy implications , 2019, Marine Policy.

[20]  Floris Goerlandt,et al.  Big maritime data for the Baltic Sea with a focus on the winter navigation system , 2019, Marine Policy.

[21]  C. Soares,et al.  Quantitative Analysis on Risk Influencing Factors in the Jiangsu Segment of the Yangtze River , 2020, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[22]  K. Sahr,et al.  Discrete Global Grid Systems , 1998 .

[23]  Stan Matwin,et al.  Ship movement anomaly detection using specialized distance measures , 2015, 2015 18th International Conference on Information Fusion (Fusion).

[24]  F. Goerlandt,et al.  Preventing shipping accidents: Past, present, and future of waterway risk management with Baltic Sea focus , 2020 .

[25]  Mumtaz Karatas,et al.  A multi-objective model for locating search and rescue boats , 2016, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[26]  Qiang Meng,et al.  An Overview of Maritime Waterway Quantitative Risk Assessment Models , 2012, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[27]  Evangelos Boulougouris,et al.  Development of a ship weather routing system for energy efficient shipping , 2016 .

[28]  S. Rezaee,et al.  The effect of extratropical cyclone weather conditions on fishing vessel incidents’ severity level in Atlantic Canada , 2016 .

[29]  Sankaran Mahadevan,et al.  Ensemble machine learning models for aviation incident risk prediction , 2019, Decis. Support Syst..

[30]  Jakub Montewka,et al.  Assessing Grounding Frequency using Ship Traffic and Waterway Complexity , 2014, Journal of Navigation.

[31]  Rafal Szlapczynski,et al.  Determining and visualizing safe motion parameters of a ship navigating in severe weather conditions , 2018, Ocean Engineering.

[32]  Harilaos N. Psaraftis,et al.  Formal Safety Assessment: an updated review , 2012 .

[33]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  An insight into imbalanced Big Data classification: outcomes and challenges , 2017 .

[34]  Pengfei Chen,et al.  Probabilistic risk analysis for ship-ship collision: State-of-the-art , 2019, Safety Science.

[35]  Xinyu Feng,et al.  Towards a Convolutional Neural Network model for classifying regional ship collision risk levels for waterway risk analysis , 2020, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[36]  Joanna Szlapczynska,et al.  Ship weather routing optimization with dynamic constraints based on reliable synchronous roll prediction , 2018 .

[37]  Mario P. Brito,et al.  Modelling of ship navigation in extreme weather events using machine learning , 2020 .

[38]  Rikard Laxhammar,et al.  Anomaly detection for sea surveillance , 2008, 2008 11th International Conference on Information Fusion.

[39]  Martin Hassel,et al.  Underreporting of maritime accidents to vessel accident databases. , 2011, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[40]  Sabine Knapp,et al.  Econometric analysis of the changing effects in wind strength and significant wave height on the probability of casualty in shipping. , 2011, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[41]  Sabine Knapp,et al.  Effects of wind strength and wave height on ship incident risk: regional trends and seasonality , 2015 .

[42]  Yu Zhou,et al.  Historical Data is Useful for Navigation Planning: Data Driven Route Generation for Autonomous Ship , 2018, 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[43]  Fadel M. Megahed,et al.  A Review of Data Analytic Applications in Road Traffic Safety. Part 1: Descriptive and Predictive Modeling , 2020, Sensors.

[44]  Keon-Myung Lee,et al.  Deep Learning-Based Caution Area Traffic Prediction with Automatic Identification System Sensor Data , 2018, Sensors.

[45]  Ronald Pelot,et al.  The effect of extreme weather conditions on commercial fishing activities and vessel incidents in Atlantic Canada , 2016 .

[46]  Ibrahim Y. Abualhaol,et al.  Mining Port Congestion Indicators from Big AIS Data , 2018, 2018 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN).

[47]  Sung-Min Lee,et al.  Method for a simultaneous determination of the path and the speed for ship route planning problems , 2018, Ocean Engineering.

[48]  Pentti Kujala,et al.  Review and analysis of methods for assessing maritime waterway risk based on non-accident critical events detected from AIS data , 2020, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[49]  Nitesh V. Chawla,et al.  SMOTE: Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique , 2002, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[50]  Serge P. Hoogendoorn,et al.  Risk Assessment Methodology for Vessel Traffic in Ports by Defining the Nautical Port Risk Index , 2019, Journal of Marine Science and Engineering.

[51]  Donghwa Lee,et al.  Vision-Based Real-Time Obstacle Segmentation Algorithm for Autonomous Surface Vehicle , 2019, IEEE Access.

[52]  Svein Kristiansen,et al.  Maritime Transportation: Safety Management and Risk Analysis , 2004 .

[53]  Iwao Fujino,et al.  Extracting Courses of Vessels from AIS Data and Real-Time Warning Against Off-Course , 2018, ICBDR 2018.

[54]  Taghi M. Khoshgoftaar,et al.  A survey on addressing high-class imbalance in big data , 2018, Journal of Big Data.

[55]  Reid A. Johnson,et al.  Calibrating Probability with Undersampling for Unbalanced Classification , 2015, 2015 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence.

[56]  Vinh V. Thai,et al.  Expert elicitation and Bayesian Network modeling for shipping accidents: A literature review , 2016 .

[57]  J Reason,et al.  The contribution of latent human failures to the breakdown of complex systems. , 1990, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[58]  Terje Aven,et al.  Risk assessment and risk management: Review of recent advances on their foundation , 2016, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[59]  Q Liang,et al.  Prediction of vessel propulsion power using machine learning on AIS data, ship performance measurements and weather data , 2019, Journal of Physics: Conference Series.

[60]  Tianqi Chen,et al.  XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System , 2016, KDD.

[61]  Yang Zhang,et al.  Spatial patterns and characteristics of global maritime accidents , 2021, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[62]  Maria Riveiro,et al.  Maritime anomaly detection: A review , 2018, WIREs Data Mining Knowl. Discov..

[63]  C. Guedes Soares,et al.  Rough weather avoidance effect on the wave climate experienced by oceangoing vessels , 2016 .

[64]  A. Harati-Mokhtari,et al.  Automatic Identification System (AIS): Data Reliability and Human Error Implications , 2007, Journal of Navigation.

[65]  Ronald Pelot,et al.  Past, present, and future of the satellite-based automatic identification system: areas of applications (2004–2016) , 2018, WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs.

[66]  Yasin Arslanoğlu,et al.  Machine learning approach to ship fuel consumption: A case of container vessel , 2020 .

[67]  Thomas Zimmermann,et al.  Planning safe navigation routes through mined waters , 2015, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[68]  Kevin X. Li,et al.  How big data enriches maritime research – a critical review of Automatic Identification System (AIS) data applications , 2019, Transport Reviews.

[69]  Børge Rokseth,et al.  Applications of machine learning methods for engineering risk assessment – A review , 2020, Safety Science.

[70]  E Maistralis,et al.  Use of Advances in Technology for Maritime Risk Assessment , 2004, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[71]  Rolf Johan Bye,et al.  Normalization of maritime accident data using AIS , 2019, Marine Policy.

[72]  Li Tang,et al.  Prediction of Grades of Ship Collision Accidents Based on Random Forests and Bayesian Networks , 2019, 2019 5th International Conference on Transportation Information and Safety (ICTIS).