Strong directivity of ocean‐generated seismic noise

[1] We measure direction and amplitude of ocean-generated continuous seismic noise in the western United States. Slowness direction of the noise is determined using array beamforming, and particle motion direction from individual three-component stations. We find two surprising results. First, the noise is highly monodirectional at all sites, regardless of coastal distance. A single narrow generation area dominates for most of the time period, interrupted by a second well defined direction during ocean swell events. Second, we find that a storm off the Labrador coast with not unusual wave heights generates coherent noise across the entire continent. We show the causal relationship between swells arriving at different North American coastal areas and the triggered microseisms in time-lapse movies (Animations 1 and 2) of ocean swells and concurrent microseisms. Our results have a number of implications for different fields of research. A useful by-product of our finding that microseisms are a strongly directional noise source is the possibility of using automated processing of the continuous noise as a near real-time check on station polarity and calibration problems, which would be a simply implemented indicator for the state of health of a seismic network. Consistent monodirectional noise may have an influence on seismic azimuthal measurements such as shear wave splitting. Most importantly, our findings should be taken into account in proposed studies which will use seismic noise as a proxy for ocean wave height in investigations of interdecadal climate change.

[1]  R. Guza,et al.  A comparison of two spectral wave models in the Southern California Bight , 1993 .

[2]  Frank Krüger,et al.  Ocean-generated microseismic noise located with the Gräfenberg array , 1998 .

[3]  E. Hjortenberg,et al.  Variation in microseism power and direction of approach in northeast Greenland , 1993 .

[4]  Klaus Hasselmann,et al.  A statistical analysis of the generation of microseisms , 1963 .

[5]  H.-H. Essen,et al.  Microseismological evidence for a changing wave climate in the northeast Atlantic Ocean , 2000, Nature.

[6]  K. Ewans,et al.  Wave–wave interactions, microseisms, and infrasonic ambient noise in the ocean , 1985 .

[7]  P. Earle POLARIZATION OF THE EARTH'S TELESEISMIC WAVEFIELD , 1999 .

[8]  Daniel E. McNamara,et al.  Azimuthal shear wave velocity anisotropy in the Basin and Range Province using moho Ps converted phases , 1993 .

[9]  M. Longuet-Higgins A theory of the origin of microseisms , 1950, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[10]  H. Essen,et al.  On the generation of secondary microseisms observed in northern and central Europe , 2003 .

[11]  Henry F. Diaz,et al.  Evidence for Intensification of North Pacific Winter Cyclones since 1948 , 2001 .

[12]  A. Jurkevics Polarization analysis of three-component array data , 1988 .

[13]  R. Clayton,et al.  Major improvements in progress for Southern California Earthquake Monitoring , 1998 .

[14]  Peter D. Bromirski,et al.  Vibrations from the “Perfect Storm” , 2001 .

[15]  Nicholas E. Graham,et al.  Ocean wave height determined from inland seismometer data: Implications for investigating wave climate changes in the NE Pacific , 1999 .

[16]  Keith McCamy,et al.  Microseisms: Coastal and pelagic sources , 1969 .