Academic engagement as knowledge co-production and implications for impact: evidence from Knowledge Transfer Partnerships

Researchers have argued that management academics' engagement with non-academic stakeholders involves knowledge co-production rather than simple knowledge transfer from the former to the latter. This study suggests that the conceptual lens of knowledge co-production not only more fittingly describes academic engagement but also enables a clearer understanding of how academic engagement produces impact beyond academia. Building upon qualitative evidence on collaborations between management academics and businesses in the United Kingdom, the study supports the characterisation of academic engagement as knowledge co-production and argues that its impact (i) strongly depends on sustained knowledge co-producing interactions, (ii) ‘ripples out’ serendipitously, indirectly benefiting many stakeholders in ways that often cannot be anticipated, and (iii) unfolds and persists over a long period. These findings have implications for impact assessment and the development of the impact research agenda.

[1]  P. Jarzabkowski.  Shaping Strategy as a Structuration Process , 2008 .

[2]  Barry Bozeman,et al.  Technology transfer and public policy: a review of research and theory , 2000 .

[3]  Ted R. Heidrick,et al.  Deriving Value from Industry-University Partnerships: A Case Study of the Advanced Engineering Materials Centre , 2005 .

[4]  A. Salter,et al.  Academic Engagement and Commercialisation: A Review of the Literature on University-Industry Relations , 2012 .

[5]  Rachel L. Parker,et al.  The ceiling to coproduction in university–industry research collaboration , 2016 .

[6]  Laura R. Meagher,et al.  Flows of knowledge, expertise and influence: a method for assessing policy and practice impacts from social science research , 2008 .

[7]  Elena P. Antonacopoulou.  Beyond co-production: practice-relevant scholarship as a foundation for delivering impact through powerful ideas , 2010 .

[8]  Anders Broström,et al.  Firms’ rationales for interaction with research universities and the principles for public co-funding , 2012 .

[9]  R. Barnacle.  New frontiers: exploring the space/s of higher education , 2016 .

[10]  Alexander T. Nicolai,et al.  That’s Relevant! Different Forms of Practical Relevance in Management Science , 2010 .

[11]  Andy Neely,et al.  How Should Firms Evaluate Success in University-Industry Alliances? A Performance Measurement System , 2010 .

[12]  J. Nicholson,et al.  Local government partnership working: a space odyssey. Or, journeys through the dilemmas of public and private sector boundary-spanning actors , 2016 .

[13]  Catriona Manville,et al.  Assessing impact submissions for REF 2014: An evaluation , 2015 .

[14]  S. Osborne,et al.  It Takes Two to Tango? Understanding the Co‐Production of Public Services by Integrating the Services Management and Public Administration Perspectives , 2013 .

[15]  J. Spaapen,et al.  Introducing ‘productive interactions’ in social impact assessment , 2011 .

[16]  Paul Stephen Benneworth,et al.  Who matters to universities? A stakeholder perspective on humanities, arts and social sciences valorisation , 2010 .

[17]  Jordi Molas-Gallart,et al.  Assessing the non-academic impact of grant-funded socio-economic research: results from a pilot study. , 2000 .

[18]  Management development and co-production: Myths and realities , 2013 .

[19]  P. Ellwood,et al.  The Impactful Academic: Relational Management Education as an Intervention for Impact , 2017 .

[20]  B. Head,et al.  The utilisation of social science research – the perspectives of academic researchers in Australia , 2015 .

[21]  James R Cook.  Engaged Scholarship: A Guide for Organizational and Social Research , 2014 .

[22]  Kevin G. Corley,et al.  Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research , 2013 .

[23]  M. Gallagher,et al.  A Collaborative Approach to Defining the Usefulness of Impact: lessons from a knowledge exchange project involving academics and social work practitioners , 2012 .

[24]  J. Swan,et al.  Explaining the Diffusion of Knowledge Management: The Role of Fashion , 2001 .

[25]  E. Guba,et al.  Lincoln, Yvonna, and Egon Guba, "Postpositivism and the Naturalist Paradigm," pp. 14-46 in Yvonna Lincoln and Egon Guba, Naturalistic Inquiry . Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1985.* , 1985 .

[26]  P. Nieuwenhuis,et al.  Operationalizing Deep Structural Sustainability in Business: Longitudinal Immersion as Extensive Engaged Scholarship , 2017 .

[27]  Kristin N. Price,et al.  Forging an Identity: An Insider-outsider Study of Processes Involved in the Formation of Organizational Identity , 2010 .

[28]  Ken Starkey,et al.  Bridging the Relevance Gap: Aligning Stakeholders in the Future of Management Research , 2001 .

[29]  Christine Nadel,et al.  Case Study Research Design And Methods , 2016 .

[30]  R. Scoble,et al.  Assessment, evaluations, and definitions of research impact: A review , 2014 .

[31]  Jiancheng Guan,et al.  The impact of university–industry collaboration networks on innovation in nanobiopharmaceuticals , 2013 .

[32]  F. Armstrong,et al.  Debate: Co-production can contribute to research impact in the social sciences , 2010 .

[33]  A. Barge-Gil,et al.  Performance of knowledge interactions between public research centres and industrial firms in Spain: a project-level analysis , 2012 .

[34]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[35]  J. Molas-Gallart,et al.  Tracing productive interactions to identify social impacts: an example from the social sciences , 2011 .

[36]  Michelle Farr,et al.  Co-Production and Value Co-Creation in Outcome-Based Contracting in Public Services , 2016 .

[37]  A. Pettigrew.  Management Research After Modernism , 2001 .

[38]  Andrew Pettigrew,et al.  Explaining process and performance in the co-production of knowledge:a comparative analysis of collaborative research projects , 2007 .

[39]  J. Schofield.  Increasing the generalizability of qualitative research. , 1993 .

[40]  D. Maclean,et al.  Mode 2 Management Research , 2002 .

[41]  Julia Olmos-Peñuela,et al.  Knowledge transfer activities in social sciences and humanities: Explaining the interactions of research groups with non-academic agents , 2014 .

[42]  Federica Rossi,et al.  Third-mission policy goals and incentives from performance-based funding: Are they aligned? , 2016 .

[43]  V. Arza.  Channels, benefits and risks of public–private interactions for knowledge transfer: conceptual framework inspired by Latin America , 2010 .

[44]  G. Scaratti,et al.  Embedding Impact in Engaged Research: Developing Socially Useful Knowledge Through Dialogical Sensemaking , 2017 .

[45]  Y. Lii,et al.  Managing innovation through co-production in interfirm partnering , 2015 .

[46]  Academic–industry collaborations and knowledge co-production in the social sciences , 2015 .

[47]  J. Brudney,et al.  Toward a Definition of the Coproduction Concept , 1983 .

[48]  David Tranfield,et al.  Co‐producing management knowledge , 2004 .

[49]  H. V. Lente,et al.  Re-thinking new knowledge production: A literature review and a research agenda , 2008 .

[50]  D. Roux,et al.  Bridging the Science-Management Divide: Moving from Unidirectional Knowledge Transfer to Knowledge Interfacing and Sharing , 2006 .

[51]  Federica Rossi,et al.  Indicators of university–industry knowledge transfer performance and their implications for universities: evidence from the United Kingdom , 2015 .

[52]  I. R. Pashby,et al.  Effective University - Industry Interaction: A Multi-case Evaluation of Collaborative R&D Projects , 2002 .

[53]  Jean M. Bartunek,et al.  Academic-practitioner collaboration need not require joint or relevant research: Toward a relational scholarship of integration. , 2007 .

[54]  Kes McCormick,et al.  University partnerships for co-designing and co-producing urban sustainability , 2014 .

[55]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges , 2007 .

[56]  Victor Pestoff,et al.  Collective Action and the Sustainability of Co-Production , 2014 .

[57]  Jennifer Rubin,et al.  Assessing policy and practice impacts of social science research: the application of the Payback Framework to assess the Future of Work programme , 2011 .