Using social‐network research to improve outcomes in natural resource management

The conservation and management of natural resources operates in social-ecological systems in which resource users are embedded in social and environmental contexts that influence their management decisions. Characterizing social networks of resource users can be used to inform understanding of social influences on decision making, and social network analysis (SNA) has emerged as a useful technique to explore these relationships. We synthesized how SNA has been used in 85 studies of natural resource management. We considered how social networks and social processes (e.g., interactions between individuals) influence each other and in turn influence social outcomes (e.g., decisions or actions) that affect environmental outcomes (e.g., improved condition). Descriptive methods were used in 58% of the studies to characterize social processes, and 42% of the studies compared multiple networks or multiple points in time to assess social or environmental outcomes. In 4 studies, authors assessed network interventions intended to affect social processes or environmental outcomes. The heterogeneity in case studies, methods, and analyses preclude general lessons. Thus, to structure and further learning about the role of social networks in achieving environmental outcomes, we created a typology that deconstructs social processes, social outcomes, and environmental outcomes into themes and options of social and ecological measures within each. We suggest shifts in research foci toward intervention studies to aid in understanding causality and inform the design of conservation initiatives. There is a need to develop clearer justification and guidance around the proliferation of network measures. The use of SNA in natural resource management is expanding rapidly; thus, now is the time for the conservation community to build a more rigorous evidence base to demonstrate the extent to which social networks can play a role in achieving desired social and environmental outcomes.

[1]  E. Ostrom.  A General Framework for Analyzing Sustainability of Social-Ecological Systems , 2009, Science.

[2]  D. Nel,et al.  A Conceptual Framework to Enable the Changes Required for a One-Planet Future , 2015 .

[3]  D. Decker,et al.  Social Learning for Collaborative Natural Resource Management , 2003 .

[4]  Johanna Eklund,et al.  Quality of governance and effectiveness of protected areas: crucial concepts for conservation planning , 2017, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[5]  Daniel J. Brass,et al.  Network Analysis in the Social Sciences , 2009, Science.

[6]  C. Hickey,et al.  Private Landowner Conservation Behavior Following Participation in Voluntary Incentive Programs: Recommendations to Facilitate Behavioral Persistence , 2018 .

[7]  G. Marshall,et al.  Understanding and promoting adoption of conservation practices by rural landholders , 2006 .

[8]  T. Valente,et al.  Accelerating the Diffusion of Innovations Using Opinion Leaders , 1999 .

[9]  Samantha Berdej,et al.  Bridging Organizations Drive Effective Governance Outcomes for Conservation of Indonesia’s Marine Systems , 2016, PloS one.

[10]  Nataša Golubovi,et al.  NETWORK STRUCTURE OF SOCIAL CAPITAL , 2010 .

[11]  M. Hockings,et al.  Systems for Assessing the Effectiveness of Management in Protected Areas , 2003 .

[12]  A. Lawrence,et al.  Private landowners' approaches to planting and managing forests in the UK: What's the evidence? , 2014 .

[13]  B. Crona,et al.  The role of social networks in natural resource governance: What relational patterns make a difference? , 2009 .

[14]  Craig W. Thomas,et al.  What Do We Know and Need to Know about the Environmental Outcomes of Collaborative Management , 2006 .

[15]  D. L. Choy,et al.  Climate change adaptation: Is there a role for intervention research? , 2013 .

[16]  Carl A Latkin,et al.  Social Network Assessments and Interventions for Health Behavior Change: A Critical Review , 2015, Behavioral medicine.

[17]  M. Webber,et al.  Health and social care interventions which promote social participation for adults with learning disabilities: a review , 2016 .

[18]  S. Engel,et al.  Social integration, participation, and community resource management , 2013 .

[19]  Stephen P. Borgatti,et al.  Network Theory , 2013 .

[20]  M. Isaac,et al.  Agricultural information exchange and organizational ties: The effect of network topology on managing agrodiversity , 2012 .

[21]  J. Wilkinson.  Network Theories and Political Economy: From Attrition to Convergence? , 2006 .

[22]  R. Burt.  The Network Structure Of Social Capital , 2000 .

[23]  Nicolás L. Gutiérrez,et al.  Leadership, social capital and incentives promote successful fisheries , 2011, Nature.

[24]  G. Cumming,et al.  Integration of private land conservation areas in a network of statutory protected areas: Implications for sustainability , 2016 .

[25]  Petr Matous,et al.  Exploring dynamic mechanisms of learning networks for resource conservation , 2015 .

[26]  Karina L. Cela,et al.  Social Network Analysis in E-Learning Environments: A Preliminary Systematic Review , 2014, Educational Psychology Review.

[27]  Subhrendu K. Pattanayak,et al.  Money for Nothing? A Call for Empirical Evaluation of Biodiversity Conservation Investments , 2006, PLoS biology.

[28]  C. Prell,et al.  Stakeholder Analysis and Social Network Analysis in Natural Resource Management , 2009, Society & Natural Resources.

[29]  Albert P.C. Chan,et al.  Review of the application of social network analysis (SNA) in construction project management research , 2016 .

[30]  D. Kittredge,et al.  It's the Network: How Personal Connections Shape Decisions about Private Forest Use , 2013 .

[31]  F. Berkes,et al.  Tracking the development of co-management: using network analysis in a case from the Canadian Arctic , 2014, Polar Record.

[32]  S. Gelcich,et al.  The Importance of Interplay Between Leadership and Social Capital in Shaping Outcomes of Rights-Based Fisheries Governance , 2017 .

[33]  Annica Sandström,et al.  Network Structure and Perceived Legitimacy in Collaborative Wildlife Management , 2016 .

[34]  Craig R. Allen,et al.  Transformative Environmental Governance. , 2016, Annual review of environment and resources.

[35]  R. Noss.  Indicators for Monitoring Biodiversity: A Hierarchical Approach , 1990 .

[36]  C. Latkin,et al.  Social Network Strategies to Address HIV Prevention and Treatment Continuum of Care Among At-risk and HIV-infected Substance Users: A Systematic Scoping Review , 2017, AIDS and Behavior.

[37]  V. Reyes‐García,et al.  Networking the environment: social network analysis in environmental management and local ecological knowledge studies , 2017 .

[38]  P. Opdam,et al.  Landscape services as boundary concept in landscape governance: Building social capital in collaboration and adapting the landscape , 2017 .

[39]  C. Prell,et al.  Combining social network approaches with social theories to improve understanding of natural resource governance , 2011 .

[40]  U. Kreuter,et al.  Factors Influencing Land Management Practices on Conservation Easement Protected Landscapes , 2015 .

[41]  Gregory Brown,et al.  Conservation on private land: a review of global strategies with a proposed classification system , 2015 .

[42]  Tom A. B. Snijders,et al.  Introduction to stochastic actor-based models for network dynamics , 2010, Soc. Networks.

[43]  K. Vance-Borland,et al.  Conservation stakeholder network mapping, analysis, and weaving , 2011 .

[44]  C. Prell,et al.  Social Networks and Natural Resource Management: Combining social network approaches with social theories to improve understanding of natural resource governance , 2011 .

[45]  Irene Iniesta-Arandia,et al.  Building ties: social capital network analysis of a forest community in a biosphere reserve in Chiapas, Mexico , 2012 .

[46]  PingSun Leung,et al.  The influence of ethnic diversity on social network structure in a common-pool resource system: implications for collaborative management , 2013 .

[47]  T. Valente.  Network Interventions , 2012, Science.

[48]  D. Knowler,et al.  Farmers’ adoption of conservation agriculture: A review and synthesis of recent research , 2007 .

[49]  Thomas W Valente,et al.  Effects of a social-network method for group assignment strategies on peer-led tobacco prevention programs in schools. , 2003, American journal of public health.

[50]  Yvonne Rydin,et al.  Networks and institutions in natural resource management , 2006 .

[51]  K. Nelson,et al.  Burning through organizational boundaries? Examining inter-organizational communication networks in policy-mandated collaborative bushfire planning groups , 2012 .