Evaluation of three-dimensional navigator-gated whole heart MR coronary angiography: the importance of systolic imaging in subjects with high heart rates.

PURPOSE To evaluate the influence of heart rate (HR) on magnetic resonance coronary angiography (MRCA) image quality in diastolic and systolic phases. MATERIALS AND METHODS Twenty-seven healthy volunteers (9 men; 33+/-9 years, HR 53-110 bpm), were evaluated with the electrocardiography and three-dimensional navigator-gating MRCA in a 1.5-T MR scanner (Avanto, Siemens) in diastolic and systolic phases (steady-state free precession; TR/TE/flip angle=3.2 ms/1.6 ms/90 degrees). The timing of scanning was individually adapted to the cardiac rest periods obtained in the prescanning, by visually identifying when the movement of right coronary artery was minimized during diastole and systole. Images of two phases were side-by-side compared on a four-point scale (from 1=poor to 4=excellent visibility; score of 3 or 4 as diagnostic). RESULTS Of 13 subjects with HR < or =65 bpm (low HR group, mean 59.8+/-4.9 bpm, range 53-65), the image quality scores were significantly better than that with higher heart rates (73.9+/-9.0 bpm, range 68-110) in diastolic MRCA. The image quality was significantly improved during systole in high HR group. Overall, 91.3% of low HR group had MRCA image of diagnostic quality acquired at diastole, while 88.3% of high HR group had diagnostic images at systole by segmental analysis (p=NS). CONCLUSIONS MRCA at systole offered superior quality in patients with high heart rates.

[1]  Udo Hoffmann,et al.  Quantitative parameters of image quality in 64-slice computed tomography angiography of the coronary arteries. , 2006, European journal of radiology.

[2]  V. Deshpande,et al.  Three‐dimensional true‐FISP imaging of the coronary arteries: Improved contrast with T2‐preparation , 2002, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[3]  René M. Botnar,et al.  Submillimeter three-dimensional coronary MR angiography with real-time navigator correction: comparison of navigator locations. , 1999, Radiology.

[4]  Eckart Fleck,et al.  Coronary MR angiography with steady-state free precession: individually adapted breath-hold technique versus free-breathing technique. , 2004, Radiology.

[5]  E. Wenkel,et al.  Noninvasive visualization of coronary arteries using contrast-enhanced multidetector CT: influence of heart rate on image quality and stenosis detection. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[6]  C. Claussen,et al.  Influence of heart rate on vessel visibility in noninvasive coronary angiography using new multislice computed tomography: experience in 94 patients. , 2002, Clinical imaging.

[7]  Michael Grass,et al.  Noninvasive coronary angiography with 16-detector row CT: effect of heart rate. , 2005, Radiology.

[8]  M. Van Cauteren,et al.  Assessment of coronary arteries with total study time of less than 30 minutes by using whole-heart coronary MR angiography. , 2005, Radiology.

[9]  V. Sinitsyn,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging in coronary heart disease. , 2001, European journal of radiology.

[10]  Kay Nehrke,et al.  Rapid and complete coronary arterial tree visualization with magnetic resonance imaging: feasibility and diagnostic performance. , 2005, European heart journal.

[11]  C. Lorenz,et al.  Quantification of in‐plane motion of the coronary arteries during the cardiac cycle: Implications for acquisition window duration for MR flow quantification , 1998, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[12]  P. Serruys,et al.  Large thrombus entrapped in a patent foramen ovale of the atrial septum, which apparently “disappeared” without embolic events , 2002, Heart.

[13]  Gabriel P. Krestin,et al.  High-Resolution Spiral Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography in Patients Referred for Diagnostic Conventional Coronary Angiography , 2005, Circulation.

[14]  Cécile Grandin,et al.  Head-to-head comparison of three-dimensional navigator-gated magnetic resonance imaging and 16-slice computed tomography to detect coronary artery stenosis in patients. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[15]  John P Ridgway,et al.  Three-dimensional coronary MR angiography performed with subject-specific cardiac acquisition windows and motion-adapted respiratory gating. , 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[16]  Y Wang,et al.  Coronary MR angiography: selection of acquisition window of minimal cardiac motion with electrocardiography-triggered navigator cardiac motion prescanning--initial results. , 2001, Radiology.

[17]  M A Hlatky,et al.  American College of Cardiology/Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions Clinical Expert Consensus Document on cardiac catheterization laboratory standards. A report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents. , 2001 .

[18]  U Joseph Schoepf,et al.  CT of coronary artery disease. , 2004, Journal of thoracic imaging.

[19]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Meta-analysis of comparative diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging and multislice computed tomography for noninvasive coronary angiography. , 2006, American heart journal.

[20]  Thomas J Vogl,et al.  Multi-detector row CT coronary angiography: influence of reconstruction technique and heart rate on image quality. , 2006, Radiology.