Trends in patch-test results and allergen changes in the standard series: a Mayo Clinic 5-year retrospective review (January 1, 2006, to December 31, 2010).

[1]  E. Zimerson,et al.  Sensitizing capacity of Disperse Orange 1 and its potential metabolites from azo reduction and their cross‐reactivity pattern , 2013, Contact dermatitis.

[2]  E. Zimerson,et al.  Contact allergy from disperse dyes in textiles–a review , 2012, Contact dermatitis.

[3]  G. Liss,et al.  Occupational contact allergens: are they also associated with occupational asthma? , 2012, American journal of industrial medicine.

[4]  E. Warshaw,et al.  Positive patch test reactions in older individuals: retrospective analysis from the North American Contact Dermatitis Group, 1994-2008. , 2012, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[5]  J. Yiannias,et al.  Patch test results may vary depending on where testing is performed: a comparison of patch test results from three geographically distinct sites in the USA , 2011, International journal of dermatology.

[6]  Elizabeth A. Rechtsteiner,et al.  Ambulatory medical care utilization estimates for 2007. , 2011, Vital and health statistics. Series 13, Data from the National Health Survey.

[7]  C. Mowad,et al.  Allergic Contact Dermatitis: Patch Testing Beyond the TRUE Test. , 2010, The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology.

[8]  E. Warshaw,et al.  Patch‐Test Results of the North American Contact Dermatitis Group 2005‐2006 , 2009, Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug.

[9]  L. Landeck,et al.  Patch‐Testing with the Standard Series at the Massachusetts General Hospital, 1998 to 2006 , 2009, Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug.

[10]  D. Cohen,et al.  Use of the North American Contact Dermatitis Group Standard 65‐Allergen Series Alone in the Evaluation of Allergic Contact Dermatitis: A Series of 794 Patients , 2008, Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug.

[11]  A. Goossens,et al.  Recommendation to include fragrance mix 2 and hydroxyisohexyl 3‐cyclohexene carboxaldehyde (Lyral®) in the European baseline patch test series , 2008, Contact dermatitis.

[12]  J. Yiannias,et al.  Should Macular Erythema Reactions Be Counted as Positive Allergic Patch‐Test Reactions? , 2006, Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug.

[13]  J. Yiannias,et al.  Patch test results from the Mayo Clinic Contact Dermatitis Group, 1998-2000. , 2005, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[14]  J. Rees.  Prevalence , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[15]  H. Maibach,et al.  North American Contact Dermatitis Group Patch‐Test Results, 2001‐2002 Study Period , 2004, Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug.

[16]  J. Yiannias,et al.  A new patient education approach in contact allergic dermatitis: the Contact Allergen Replacement Database (CARD) * , 2004, International journal of dermatology.

[17]  H. Maibach,et al.  North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch-test results, 1998 to 2000. , 2003, American journal of contact dermatitis : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society.

[18]  D. Belsito,et al.  Regional variation in prevalence and etiology of allergic contact dermatitis. , 2002, American journal of contact dermatitis : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society.

[19]  H. Maibach,et al.  Textile dye allergic contact dermatitis prevalence , 2000, Contact dermatitis.

[20]  J. S. Taylor,et al.  North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch-test results, 1996-1998. , 2000, Archives of dermatology.

[21]  A. Goossens,et al.  Thoughts on sensitizers in a standard patch test series , 1999, Contact dermatitis.

[22]  S. González,et al.  Patch testing reactions to a standard series in 608 patients tested from 1990 to 1997 at Massachusetts General Hospital. , 1998, American journal of contact dermatitis : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society.

[23]  A. Larkin,et al.  The utility of patch tests using larger screening series of allergens. , 1998, American journal of contact dermatitis : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society.

[24]  J. S. Taylor,et al.  North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch test results for the detection of delayed-type hypersensitivity to topical allergens. , 1998, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[25]  E. Czarnobilska,et al.  Detection of contact allergy: using more extensive test series increases the diagnostic efficacy of patch tests. , 2010, Przeglad lekarski.

[26]  J. Yiannias,et al.  Changing trends and allergens in the patch test standard series: a mayo clinic 5-year retrospective review, january 1, 2001, through december 31, 2005. , 2008, Archives of dermatology.

[27]  E. Shea.  The contact allergen replacement database and treatment of allergic contact dermatitis , 2005 .