WWW.FAITH.ORG (Re)structuring communication and the social capital of religious organizations

This paper examines the relationships between Internet and social capital building within religious organizations, which are relatively understudied foci. Building upon theoretical insights provided by new institutionalism and recent research on the Internet, social capital and religion, this article explores the ways in which religious organizations have (re)structured their norms, values, and practices of religious community in light of the incorporation of the Internet into their congregational life. Drawing from interviews conducted with Christian and Buddhist religious leaders in Toronto, this article discusses three major relationships in which the effects of the Internet on social capital may be understood, that is, complementary, transformative, and perverse relationships. Religious organizations are traditionally associated with relatively high stocks of social capital, yet findings here suggest that their communicative norms, values, and practices are changing to a varying extent. The results also indicate that the relationship between the Internet and social capital building is largely complementary; however, the Internet is perceived by some to be a ‘mixed blessing’, facilitating the potential transformation of organizational practices that affect community norms while leading to the dispersion of religious ties that could undermine community solidarity. Thus, contrary to earlier studies that have documented no evidence of innovations involving the reconfiguration of organizational practices and the adjustment of mission or services, findings here illustrate how some religious organizations have expanded the scope of their calling and restructured their communicative practices to spur administrative and operational effectiveness. Like other organizations, religious organizations are not insulated from technological changes including those associated with the Internet. This study clarifies and identifies key ways in which the distinct spirituality, cultural values, and institutional practices and norms of religious organizations influence communication processes that constitute bridging and bonding forms of social capital in this dot.org era of faith.

[1]  Steven G. Jones The Internet and its social landscape , 1997 .

[2]  C. Geertz Thick Description: Towards an Interpretive Theory of Culture , 1973 .

[3]  J. Naughton CONTESTED SPACE: THE INTERNET AND GLOBAL CIVIL SOCIETY , 2001 .

[4]  Kristine L. Fitch Criteria for evidence in qualitative research , 1994 .

[5]  Robert D. Putnam,et al.  Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community , 2000, CSCW '00.

[6]  J. K. Benson,et al.  TOWARD A THEORY OF RELIGIOUS ORGANIZATIONS , 1971 .

[7]  Karine Nahon,et al.  Cultured Technology: The Internet and Religious Fundamentalism , 2005, Inf. Soc..

[8]  Marta Perrotta,et al.  Jesus in Disneyland. Religion in Postmodern Times , 2002 .

[9]  H. Waitzkin Interpretive analysis of spoken discourse: Dealing with the limitations of quantitative and qualitative methods , 1993 .

[10]  Pauline Hope Cheong,et al.  Technological Modernization, the Internet, and Religion in Singapore , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[11]  Heidi Campbell,et al.  Considering spiritual dimensions within computer-mediated communication studies , 2005, New Media Soc..

[12]  D. Lyon Jesus in Disneyland: Religion in Postmodern Times , 2000 .

[13]  J. Davidson The Census of Canada , 1901 .

[14]  N. Fligstein,et al.  Fields, Power and Social Skill: a Critical Analysis of the New Institutionalisms , 1999 .

[15]  D. Hindman The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier , 1996 .

[16]  Jeanne Tessier Barone,et al.  Interviewing: Art and Skill , 1995 .

[17]  Rudi K. F. Bresser,et al.  Institutional Capital: Competitive Advantage In Light Of The New Institutionalism In Organization Theory , 2003 .

[18]  A. Giddens Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age , 1992, The New Social Theory Reader.

[19]  Daniel A. Stout,et al.  Religion and mass media : audiences and adaptations , 1997 .

[20]  Bryan C. Taylor,et al.  Qualitative Research Methods , 2001 .

[21]  E. Burt,et al.  WHEN 'VIRTUAL' MEETS VALUES: INSIGHTS FROM THE VOLUNTARY SECTOR , 2001 .

[22]  Volker Wulf,et al.  Social Capital and Information Technology: Current Debates and Research , 2004 .

[23]  Gerard Delanty The Foundations of Social Theory , 2009 .

[24]  O. Williamson,et al.  Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. , 1977 .

[25]  Peter Beyer,et al.  Handbook of the Sociology of Religion: Social Forms of Religion and Religions in Contemporary Global Society , 2003 .

[26]  Jean Hartley,et al.  Case study research , 2004 .

[27]  A. Portes Social Capital: Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology , 1998 .

[28]  Christian A. Smith,et al.  ‘To Whom Much Has Been Given...’: Religious Capital and Community Voluntarism Among Churchgoing Protestants , 2000 .

[29]  Barry Wellman,et al.  The Social Affordances of the Internet for Networked Individualism , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[30]  I. Her Thick description: toward an interpretive theory of culture, in: The interpretation of cultures: selected essays . New-York/N.Y./USA etc , 2022 .

[31]  L. Dawson,et al.  Religion Online: Finding Faith on the Internet , 2004 .

[32]  Linda L. Putnam,et al.  The New Handbook of Organizational Communication , 2001 .

[33]  Ralph Schroeder,et al.  The Sacred and the Virtual: Religion in Multi-User Virtual Reality , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[34]  M. Huysman,et al.  How Does the Internet Affect Social Capital , 2004 .

[35]  Mark Chaves,et al.  Secularization as Declining Religious Authority , 1994 .

[36]  Stephen D. O'Leary Cyberspace as Sacred Space: Communicating Religion on Computer Networks , 1996 .

[37]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage , 1998 .