Social and Cognitive Factors Affecting the Own-Race Bias in Whites

This study investigated factors associated with the commonly found own-race bias (ORB) in face recognition. We utilized several measures of general face-recognition memory, visual perception and memory, general cognitive functioning, racial attitudes, and cross-race experience in an attempt to distinguish those individuals more likely to demonstrate the effect. White respondents (N = 129) were presented two facial-recognition tests (immediate and delayed) involving Black and White faces of both genders. The resulting ORB stemmed largely from a bias to respond "seen before" to Black faces, and produced an effect that was reliable across a 2-day period. An own-sex bias in accuracy was also found. The Benton Facial Recognition test and the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure test, 2 central measures of visual memory, were related to ability to recognize White faces. Self-reported amount of recent cross-race experiences was also correlated with overall accuracy on Black and White faces.

[1]  S. L. Sporer,et al.  Deep--deeper--deepest? Encoding strategies and the recognition of human faces. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[2]  M. S. Mayzner,et al.  A perspective on the recognition of other-race faces , 1976 .

[3]  R. Malpass,et al.  Recognition for faces of own and other race. , 1969, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[4]  A. G. Goldstein,et al.  Visual recognition memory for complex configurations , 1971 .

[5]  H. Ellis,et al.  A Cross-Cultural Study of Recognition Memory For Faces , 1974 .

[6]  T. Valentine,et al.  Towards an Exemplar Model of Face Processing: The Effects of Race and Distinctiveness , 1992, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[7]  Roy S. Malpass,et al.  Orienting Strategies in Differential Face Recognition , 1985 .

[8]  Saul M. Kassin,et al.  The "general acceptance" of psychological research on eyewitness testimony: A survey of the experts. , 1989 .

[9]  Weiting Ng,et al.  Cross-Race Facial Recognition , 1994 .

[10]  W. Banks.  The changing attitudes of black students , 1970 .

[11]  Stephanie J. Platz,et al.  Cross‐Racial/Ethnic Eyewitness Identification: A Field Study1 , 1988 .

[12]  F. Craik,et al.  Levels of Pro-cessing: A Framework for Memory Research , 1975 .

[13]  J. Grier,et al.  Nonparametric indexes for sensitivity and bias: computing formulas. , 1971, Psychological bulletin.

[14]  Edith Meyer Taylor,et al.  Psychological Appraisal of Children with Cerebral Defects , 1959 .

[15]  Racial and Gender Issues in Facial Recognition , 1992 .

[16]  Steven D. Penrod,et al.  Mistaken Identification: The Eyewitness, Psychology and the Law , 1995 .

[17]  Roy S. Malpass,et al.  Psychological issues in eyewitness identification. , 1996 .

[18]  J. P. Lipton,et al.  On the psychology of eyewitness testimony. , 1977 .

[19]  M Glanzer,et al.  The mirror effect in recognition memory , 1984, Memory & cognition.

[20]  H. Hosch.  Individual differences in personality and eyewitness identification. , 1994 .

[21]  J. R. Vokey,et al.  Familiarity, memorability, and the effect of typicality on the recognition of faces , 1992, Memory & cognition.

[22]  G. Whipple.  The observer as reporter: A survey of the 'psychology of testimony'. , 1909 .

[23]  S. Lloyd-Bostock,et al.  Evaluating witness evidence : recent psychological research and new perspectives , 1983 .

[24]  T. Valentine,et al.  An Investigation of the Contact Hypothesis of the Own-race Bias in Face Recognition , 1995 .

[25]  S. Carey,et al.  The recognition and encoding of faces by alcoholic Korsakoff and right hemisphere patients , 1978, Neuropsychologia.

[26]  G. A. Feingold.  Influence of Environment on Identification of Persons and Things , 1914 .

[27]  J. Brigham,et al.  The Role of Experience and Contact in the Recognition of Faces Of Own‐ and Other‐Race Persons , 1985 .

[28]  E. Warrington,et al.  An Experimental Investigation of Facial Recognition in Patients with Unilateral Cerebral Lesions , 1967 .

[29]  Brian Mullen,et al.  Cross-Racial Facial Identification: A Social Cognitive Integration , 1992 .

[30]  Y. Amir,et al.  Contact hypothesis in ethnic relations. , 1969, Psychological bulletin.

[31]  J. Brigham,et al.  Recognition of Faces: Own-Race Bias, Incentive, and Time Delay1 , 1982 .

[32]  A. Milne,et al.  The effect of experimental design on memory for typical and distinctive faces. , 1996, Memory.

[33]  J. H. Steiger.  Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix. , 1980 .

[34]  T. Howells.  A study of ability to recognize faces. , 1938 .

[35]  S. Carey,et al.  Why faces are and are not special: an effect of expertise. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[36]  P. Osterrieth.  Le test de copie d'une figure complexe , 1944 .

[37]  A. Benton,et al.  The neuropsychology of facial recognition. , 1980, The American psychologist.

[38]  M Glanzer,et al.  The mirror effect in recognition memory: data and theory. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[39]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Expertise and configural coding in face recognition. , 1989, British journal of psychology.

[40]  J. Brigham,et al.  Do “They all look alike?” The Effect of Race, Sex, Experience, and Attitudes on the Ability to Recognize Faces1 , 1978 .

[41]  J. F. Cross,et al.  Sex, race, age, and beauty as factors in recognition of faces , 1971 .

[42]  J Tudor-Hart,et al.  On the nature of prejudice. , 1961, The Eugenics review.

[43]  Alvin G. Goldstein,et al.  The other-race effect and eyewitness identification. , 1996 .

[44]  S. Penrod,et al.  Meta-analysis of facial identification studies. , 1986 .

[45]  The obtaining of information: Psychology of observation and report. , 1918 .

[46]  J. Brigham,et al.  College Students’ Racial Attitudes , 1993 .

[47]  A. Benton,et al.  Visuoperceptual, visuospatial, and visuoconstructive disorders. , 1993 .

[48]  R. Sabatelli.  The Social Psychology of Groups , 2000 .

[49]  A. W. Carroo,et al.  Other Race Recognition: A Comparison of Black American and African Subjects , 1986, Perceptual and motor skills.

[50]  G. Āllport.  The Nature of Prejudice , 1954 .

[51]  J. Brigham,et al.  Cross-Racial Identification , 1989 .

[52]  S. Mason,et al.  Age and gender as factors in facial recognition and identification. , 1986, Experimental aging research.

[53]  E. Sagarin,et al.  Convicted but Innocent: Wrongful Conviction and Public Policy , 1996 .

[54]  W. Donaldson.  Measuring recognition memory. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[55]  Recognition of Faces as a Function of Race, Attitudes, and Reported Cross-Racial Friendships , 1987 .

[56]  T. Valentine.  The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology a Unified Account of the Effects of Distinctiveness, Inversion, and Race in Face Recognition , 2022 .

[57]  J. Brigham,et al.  Accuracy of Eyewitness Identifications in a Field Setting , 1982 .

[58]  Gillian Rhodes,et al.  Recognition of own-race and other-race caricatures: implications for models of face recognition , 1998, Vision Research.

[59]  Elizabeth F. Loftus,et al.  Eyewitness testimony : psychological perspectives , 1984 .

[60]  A. O'Toole,et al.  Structural aspects of face recognition and the other-race effect , 1994, Memory & cognition.

[61]  M. R. Leippe,et al.  The case for expert testimony about eyewitness memory. , 1995 .

[62]  Hugo Münsterberg,et al.  On the Witness Stand; Essays on Psychology and Crime , 2007 .