Predicting and Improving the Probability of Live Birth for Women Undergoing Frozen-thawed Embryo Transfer: a Data-driven Estimation and Simulation Model

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) is now widely used for the treatment of infertility. For many couples and clinicians, concerns over the probability and how to increase the chance of a successful birth are very common. Currently, there is not a single model to predict the live birth outcomes for FET. To estimate the probability of live birth (PLB) in FET and to provide advice on potential treatment options by a data-driven predictive (DDP) model. METHODS 2,189 FET cycles from Jan 2012 to Dec 2015 were recruited in a single center. 815 cycles of FET outcomes were live births and 1,374 cycles of FET outcomes failed. To verify the consistency of the DDP model, we carried out 10-fold cross-validation, and the mean and standard deviation of the accuracy were measured. Moreover, the performance of this model was evaluated by the mean and standard deviation of receiver operating characteristic curve and area under the curve (AUC). RESULTS Nine dominant factors, including age, BMI, HOMA-IR, basal follicle stimulating hormone, basal luteinizing hormone, basal estradiol, endometrial thickness, the number of embryo transfers and the total number of embryos, were automatically extracted from 28 candidate factors. The accuracy of our prediction model is 76.9%±1.6%, and the AUC is 0.83. Then, the PLB is estimated by the random forest algorithm. On this basis, the DDP model can comprehensively traverse and dynamically visualize the impact of several factors on live birth outcomes. Finally, optimal suggestions for the treatment of patients before FET are attempted to be made by the genetic algorithm. CONCLUSION The DDP model can not only provide satisfactory performance for predicting live birth outcomes in FET but also offer a visual estimation and simulation tool for clinicians to make treatment plans.

[1]  Jason Weston,et al.  Gene Selection for Cancer Classification using Support Vector Machines , 2002, Machine Learning.

[2]  Fivnat Pregnancies and births resulting from in vitro fertilization: French national registry, analysis of data 1986 to 1990. FIVNAT (French In Vitro National). , 1995, Fertility and sterility.

[3]  D. Lawlor,et al.  Predicting Live Birth, Preterm Delivery, and Low Birth Weight in Infants Born from In Vitro Fertilisation: A Prospective Study of 144,018 Treatment Cycles , 2011, PLoS medicine.

[4]  Charles X. Ling,et al.  Using AUC and accuracy in evaluating learning algorithms , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[5]  M. Pepe,et al.  Gestational diabetes and the risk of offspring obesity. , 1998, Pediatrics.

[6]  Matheus Roque,et al.  Fresh embryo transfer versus frozen embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2013, Fertility and sterility.

[7]  Yuping Wang,et al.  An orthogonal genetic algorithm with quantization for global numerical optimization , 2001, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[8]  Joan K. Morris,et al.  Factors that affect outcome of in-vitro fertilisation treatment , 1996, The Lancet.

[9]  J. Emberson,et al.  A multi-centre cohort study of the physical health of 5-year-old children conceived after intracytoplasmic sperm injection, in vitro fertilization and natural conception. , 2005, Human reproduction.

[10]  M. Ashrafi,et al.  The factors affecting the outcome of frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycle. , 2011, Taiwanese journal of obstetrics & gynecology.

[11]  P. Bossuyt,et al.  Predictive factors in in vitro fertilization (IVF): a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2010, Human reproduction update.

[12]  A. Willan,et al.  The prognosis for live birth among untreated infertile couples. , 1995, Fertility and sterility.

[13]  J. García-Velasco,et al.  Current status of human oocyte and embryo cryopreservation , 2011, Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology.

[14]  R. Henshaw,et al.  Does obesity really matter? The impact of BMI on embryo quality and pregnancy outcomes after IVF in women aged ≤38 years , 2012, The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology.

[15]  S. Silber,et al.  Minimal ovarian stimulation (mini-IVF) for IVF utilizing vitrification and cryopreserved embryo transfer. , 2010, Reproductive biomedicine online.

[16]  Ruey-Shiang Guh,et al.  Integrating genetic algorithm and decision tree learning for assistance in predicting in vitro fertilization outcomes , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[17]  D. Gruber,et al.  Body Mass Index, Follicle-Stimulating Hormone and Their Predictive Value in In Vitro Fertilization , 2004, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics.

[18]  S. Sunkara,et al.  Effect of body mass index on IVF treatment outcome: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2011, Reproductive biomedicine online.

[19]  P. Andersen,et al.  Influence of female bodyweight on IVF outcome: a longitudinal multicentre cohort study of 487 infertile couples. , 2011, Reproductive biomedicine online.

[20]  YongLun Fu,et al.  Double stimulations during the follicular and luteal phases of poor responders in IVF/ICSI programmes (Shanghai protocol). , 2014, Reproductive biomedicine online.

[21]  Wing H Wong,et al.  Personalized prediction of first-cycle in vitro fertilization success. , 2013, Fertility and sterility.

[22]  Igor Kononenko,et al.  Machine learning for medical diagnosis: history, state of the art and perspective , 2001, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[23]  Andrew P. Bradley,et al.  The use of the area under the ROC curve in the evaluation of machine learning algorithms , 1997, Pattern Recognit..

[24]  E. Levens,et al.  Blastocyst development rate impacts outcome in cryopreserved blastocyst transfer cycles. , 2008, Fertility and sterility.