Assessment of Student Learning: promoting a scholarly approach

Assessment of student learning matters more than ever in the changing world of higher education and with changing expectations society has of its university graduates. For this reason, it is imperative that all staff involved in supporting student learning (particularly new academic staff starting their lecturing careers) are enabled to understand the fundamental principles of assessment of student learning, so that they in turn can endeavour to enhance student learning through effective assessment (Stefani, 1998). The aim of this paper is to present a model for promoting the scholarship of assessment which highlights that assessment is an integral aspect of student learning.

[1]  P. Orsmond,et al.  The Importance of Marking Criteria in the Use of Peer Assessment , 1996 .

[2]  John Hattie,et al.  The Relation between Research Productivity and Teaching Effectiveness , 2002 .

[3]  N. Longworth Making Lifelong Learning Work , 1996 .

[4]  Kevin Cox,et al.  Student Assessment in Higher Education: A Handbook for Assessing Performance , 1998 .

[5]  D. Kember A reconceptualisation of the research into university academics' conceptions of teaching , 1997 .

[6]  L. Elton Research, teaching and scholarship in an expanding higher education system. , 1992 .

[7]  Lee Harvey,et al.  Transforming Higher Education , 1996 .

[8]  S. Moon,et al.  Graduates' Work: Organisational Change and Students' Attributes. , 1997 .

[9]  E. Boyer Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate , 1990 .

[10]  D. Schoen,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action , 1985 .

[11]  K. Harmon,et al.  Academic tribes and territories — Intellectual enquiry and the cultures of disciplines Tony Becher , 1990 .

[12]  Norman Longworth,et al.  Making Lifelong Learning Work: Learning Cities for a Learning Century , 1996 .

[13]  D. Bligh Learning to teach in higher education , 1993 .

[14]  R. J. Bogumil,et al.  The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action , 1985, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[15]  Lewis Elton,et al.  Research and teaching: symbiosis or conflict , 1986 .

[16]  P. Ramsden Learning to Teach in Higher Education , 1991 .

[17]  Donald A. Sch The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action , 1983 .

[18]  David Gosling,et al.  Educational development units in the UK - what are they doing five years on? , 2001 .

[19]  P. Breivik Student Learning In The Information Age , 1997 .

[20]  G. Lueddeke,et al.  Professionalising Teaching Practice in Higher Education: A study of disciplinary variation and 'teaching-scholarship' , 2003 .

[21]  Tony Becher,et al.  Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Cultures of Disciplines , 2001 .

[22]  Stephen Merry,et al.  A Study in Self‐assessment: tutor and students’ perceptions of performance criteria , 1997 .

[23]  John Cowan,et al.  A Logical Model for Curriculum Development , 1986 .

[24]  Nc Selwyn,et al.  Student Learning in the Information Age , 1999 .

[25]  J. Biggs,et al.  Teaching For Quality Learning At University , 1999 .

[26]  L. Stefani,et al.  The difficulties of defining development: A case study , 2002 .

[27]  Lorraine Stefani,et al.  Assessment in Partnership with Learners , 1998 .

[28]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. , 1987 .

[29]  John Hattie,et al.  The Relation between Research Productivity and Teaching Effectiveness , 2002 .

[30]  J. M. Collins Becoming a Critically Reflective Teacher , 1997 .

[31]  F. Marton,et al.  ON QUALITATIVE DIFFERENCES IN LEARNING: I—OUTCOME AND PROCESS* , 1976 .

[32]  Fowler Vincent Harper,et al.  Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching , 1915, Nature.

[33]  K. Fisher Demystifying Critical Reflection: Defining criteria for assessment , 2003 .

[34]  Ralph T. Putnam,et al.  Learning to teach. , 1996 .

[35]  David Boud,et al.  Enhancing learning through self assessment , 1995 .