Multiple Constituencies, Differential Power, and the Question of Effectiveness in Human Service Organizations

A multiple constituencies model of human service organizations identifies twelve interest groups which must be considered when effectiveness questions are raised. The differential power of the interest groups suggests that some groups' preferences are likely to be emphasized over others. The relationship between power inside the organization and that on the outside is analyzed. Recent trends in the growth andmiiitancy of professional associations and employee groups suggest that internal control by senior administrators is increasingly challenged and variable. Future studies of effectiveness in the human services are encouraged to remain sensitive to the effects of constituency interests and power on the establishment and implementation of priorities and goals. The mandate to human service organizations (HSO's) that they "provide service to clients" (Hasenfeld and English, 1974) is more problematic than appears on the surface. To "provide service," an organization must first survive yet policies and procedures which facilitate survival may contradict a "service" orientation (Glisson and Martin, 1980). Furthermore, service organizations both contain and operate in the midst of multiple constituencies or interest groups which hold conflicting and incompatible expectations regarding their proper role and outputs (Schmidt and Kochan, 1976; Whetten, 1977, 1978). Clients, for example, tend to hold different expectations for a service agency than do agency administrators or the public-at-large (Scott, 1977). With different constituencies expecting, and often demanding, different types of outputs, a question can be raised as to how an organization's success at fulfilling its mandate or goals is to be evaluated or assessed (Blackwell and Bolman, 1977; Keeley, 1978; Kouzes and Mico, 1979). The aim of the present paper is to present and develop a multiple constituencies model of human service organizations and to analyze its implications for Understanding the concept of effectiveness in a social services context. Attention is given to the correlates and consequences of power differentials among the constituent groups with particular emphasis on the implications of such differences 'for influencing the types of goals which members of the organization are likely to 'pursue.

[1]  H. Braverman Labor and Monopoly Capital: The Degradation of Work in the Twentieth Century , 1996 .

[2]  J. Pennings,et al.  Structural conditions of intraorganizational power , 1974 .

[3]  F. Glen The social psychology of organizations , 1976 .

[4]  David A. Whetten,et al.  Coping with Incompatible Expectations: An Integrated View of Role Conflict. , 1978 .

[5]  W. Rosengren,et al.  Organizations and clients : essays in the sociology of service , 1971 .

[6]  B. Gummer A Power-Politics Approach to Social Welfare Organizations , 1978, Social Service Review.

[7]  P. Blau Exchange and Power in Social Life , 1964 .

[8]  T. Holland Organizational structure and institutional care. , 1973, Journal of health and social behavior.

[9]  Paul S. Goodman,et al.  New perspectives on organizational effectiveness , 1977 .

[10]  D. Whetten COPING WITH INCOMPATIBLE EXPECTATIONS:: ROLE CONFLICT AMONG DIRECTORS OF MANPOWER AGENCIES , 1978 .

[11]  P. Goldman,et al.  Managerial Strategies and the Worker: a Marxist Analysis of Bureaucracy* , 1976 .

[12]  J. Kenneth Benson,et al.  The Analysis of Bureaucratic‐Professional Conflict: Functional Versus Dialectical Approaches* , 1973 .

[13]  W. Heydebrand Organizational Contradictions in Public Bureaucracies: Toward a Marxian Theory of Organizations* , 1976 .

[14]  Yeheskel Hasenfeld,et al.  People Processing Organizations: An Exchange Approach , 1972 .

[15]  E. Yuchtman,et al.  A System Resource Approach to Organizational Effectiveness , 1967 .

[16]  David Jenkins Job power; blue and white collar democracy , 1973 .

[17]  J. Kenneth Benson,et al.  Organizations: A Dialectical View. , 1977 .

[18]  Amitai Etzioni,et al.  A Comparative Analysis of Complex Organizations. , 1962 .

[19]  H. Simon,et al.  On the concept of organizational goal. , 1964 .

[20]  Mary Anne Devanna Men and Women of the Corporation , 1978 .

[21]  An Application of a "Political Economy" Approach To Effectiveness , 1976 .

[22]  M Keeley,et al.  A social-justice approach to organizational evaluation. , 1978, Administrative science quarterly.

[23]  J. Pennings,et al.  A Strategic Contingencies' Theory of Intraorganizational Power , 1971 .

[24]  Y. Hasenfeld Organizational dilemmas in innovating social services: the case of the community action centers. , 1971, Journal of health and social behavior.

[25]  Paul R. Mico,et al.  Domain Theory: An Introduction to Oganizational Behavior in Human Service Organizations , 1979 .

[26]  Charles Perrow,et al.  THE ANALYSIS OF GOALS IN COMPLEX ORGANIZATIONS , 1961 .

[27]  Richard H. Hall,et al.  The Concept of Bureaucracy: An Empirical Assessment , 1963, American Journal of Sociology.

[28]  D. Rueschemeyer Structural Differentiation, Efficiency, and Power , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[29]  Amitai Etzioni,et al.  Two Approaches to Organizational Analysis: A Critique and A Suggestion , 1960 .

[30]  F. Friedlander,et al.  Components of Effectiveness in Small Organizations , 1968 .

[31]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[32]  P. Y. Martin,et al.  Bureaucracy, size, and staff expectations for client independence in halfway houses. , 1977, Journal of health and social behavior.

[33]  C. Glisson,et al.  Productivity and efficiency in human service organizations as related to structure, size, and age. , 1980, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.