Antiadrenergic therapy of chronic heart failure: surprises and new opportunities.

The great British-American scientist-philosopher Alfred North Whitehead divided progress into three stages, the second of which was termed precision, in which the “right ways and wrong ways” of an original idea are elucidated.1 During this period, reinterpretation of the basic idea occurs and is essential to progress. Whitehead’s message is that important ideas are dynamic instruments that are constantly changing as new and usually unexpected information becomes available. This is why tests of particular hypotheses, including those tested in Phase III clinical trials, are often unsupportive, and why therapeutic paradigms constantly change. Within such an ephemeral milieu, the key to ultimate success is to view each unexpected or negative result as an opportunity for constructing and testing even more novel and valuable hypotheses within the framework of the general idea, to ascend to the final stage where progress can be “generalized.”1 Whitehead’s philosophical legacy is impressively in play in the area of antiadrenergic therapy of chronic heart failure (CHF). The unarguable basic idea is that the biologically powerful adrenergic compensatory mechanism plays a critical role in the natural history of CHF. It is the details or nuances within the general paradigm that continue to change, and lately, surprisingly so. As recently reviewed,2 the importance of dysfunctional adrenergic activation in CHF was first elucidated by work performed by Braunwald’s group at the National Institutes of Health in the 1960s. Among other things, this early work provided the first evidence of marked adrenergic activation in CHF. However, on the basis of reduction in myocardial tissue norepinephrine, and the short-term effects of large doses of antiadrenergic agents,3 the overall interpretation was that adrenergic support was deficient in CHF. This view prevailed for 10 to 15 years, and it contributed to the original logic behind developing Type III phosphodiesterase inhibitors …

[1]  M. Domanski,et al.  A comparative analysis of the results from 4 trials of beta-blocker therapy for heart failure: BEST, CIBIS-II, MERIT-HF, and COPERNICUS. , 2003, Journal of cardiac failure.

[2]  S. Kardia,et al.  Synergistic Polymorphisms of β1- and α2C-Adrenergic Receptors and the Risk of Congestive Heart Failure , 2002 .

[3]  N. Aiyar,et al.  Bucindolol Displays Intrinsic Sympathomimetic Activity in Human Myocardium , 2002, Circulation.

[4]  R. Quaife,et al.  Myocardial gene expression in dilated cardiomyopathy treated with beta-blocking agents. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  K. Swedberg,et al.  Effects of Sustained-Release Moxonidine, an Imidazoline Agonist, on Plasma Norepinephrine in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure , 2002, Circulation.

[6]  M. Lohse,et al.  Constitutive Activity of the Human β1-Adrenergic Receptor in β1-Receptor Transgenic Mice , 2001 .

[7]  M. Bristow,et al.  Inotropes and β-blockers: Is there a need for new guidelines? , 2001 .

[8]  R. Schwinger,et al.  Nebivolol, bucindolol, metoprolol and carvedilol are devoid of intrinsic sympathomimetic activity in human myocardium , 2001, British journal of pharmacology.

[9]  M. Domanski,et al.  A trial of the beta-blocker bucindolol in patients with advanced chronic heart failure. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  G. MacGowan,et al.  Pharmacogenetic Interactions Between &bgr;-Blocker Therapy and the Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Deletion Polymorphism in Patients With Congestive Heart Failure , 2001, Circulation.

[11]  E. Braunwald,et al.  Congestive Heart Failure: Fifty Years of Progress , 2000, Circulation.

[12]  M. Bristow What Type of β-Blocker Should Be Used to Treat Chronic Heart Failure? , 2000 .

[13]  M. Metra,et al.  Differential Effects of β-Blockers in Patients With Heart Failure , 2000 .

[14]  B. Brodie,et al.  Relationship between delay in performing direct coronary angioplasty and early clinical outcome in patients with acute myocardial infarction. , 2000, Circulation.

[15]  Qingbo Xu,et al.  Serum soluble heat shock protein 60 is elevated in subjects with atherosclerosis in a general population. , 2000, Circulation.

[16]  M. Flesch,et al.  Different intrinsic activities of bucindolol, carvedilol and metoprolol in human failing myocardium , 2000, British journal of pharmacology.

[17]  A. Cohen-Solal,et al.  Treatment of Heart Failure With Celiprolol, a Cardioselective Beta Blocker With Beta-2 Agonist Vasodilatory Properties , 2000 .

[18]  M. Bristow β-Adrenergic Receptor Blockade in Chronic Heart Failure , 2000 .

[19]  A. Cohen-Solal,et al.  Treatment of heart failure with celiprolol, a cardioselective beta blocker with beta-2 agonist vasodilatory properties. The CELICARD Group. , 2000, The American journal of cardiology.

[20]  M. Metra,et al.  Differential effects of beta-blockers in patients with heart failure: A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of the long-term effects of metoprolol versus carvedilol. , 2000, Circulation.

[21]  A. Coats Heart Failure 99 -- the MOXCON story. , 1999, International journal of cardiology.

[22]  N. Aiyar,et al.  In vitro and in vivo characterization of intrinsic sympathomimetic activity in normal and heart failure rats. , 1999, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.

[23]  M. Bristow,et al.  The role of third‐generation beta‐blocking agents in chronic heart failure , 1998, Clinical cardiology.

[24]  Xamoterol in severe heart failure. The Xamoterol in Severe Heart Failure Study Group. , 1990, Lancet.

[25]  A. Whitehead Whitehead's American Essays in Social Philosophy. , 1975 .

[26]  E. Braunwald,et al.  Importance of the adrenergic nervous system in the support of circulatory function in patients with congestive heart failure. , 1963, The American journal of medicine.