Mission results for Sapphire, a student-built satellite

Abstract More than 35 student-built spacecraft were launched from 2000–2005, with nearly 50 more scheduled in the next 5 years. While increasingly popular, such projects require significant commitment from universities, their students and their sponsors; thus, it would be useful to assess the educational and technical merit of these programs. For this paper, we examine Sapphire, Stanford University's first student spacecraft. This mission is relevant because of its on-orbit success, its role in founding one of the few sustained student spacecraft programs, and because Sapphire team members launched similar programs at five other universities around the world. Sapphire performed first-flight demonstration of micromachined infrared detectors, carried public-use instruments for photography and communications and demonstrated autonomous operation technologies. We compare the Sapphire design with on-orbit performance, and provide recommendations for creating similar programs. In particular, the strengths and weaknesses of Sapphire-scale projects are compared against the new CubeSat specification.

[1]  K. Thyagarajan,et al.  University small satellite program—ANUSAT , 2005 .

[2]  Christopher Kitts,et al.  Initial developments in the Stanford SQUIRT program , 1995, Remote Sensing.

[3]  Robert Twiggs.  Space system developments at Stanford University: from launch experience of microsatellites to the proposed future use of picosatellites , 2000, SPIE Optics + Photonics.

[4]  Fabio Santoni,et al.  Mechanical Design and Manufacturing of the Microsatellite UNISAT , 2001 .

[5]  Christopher Kitts,et al.  A Standardized, Distributed Computing Architecture: Results from Three Universities , 2005 .

[6]  Enrico Troiani,et al.  The microsatellite research program at Università di Bologna , 2005 .

[7]  Michael Swartwout,et al.  University-Class Satellites: From Marginal Utility to 'Disruptive' Research Platforms , 2004 .

[8]  M. N. Sweeting.  UOSAT—an investigation into cost-effective spacecraft engineering , 1982 .

[9]  D. Zachary Allen,et al.  Citizen Explorer-I: an Earth observer with new small satellite technology , 2005 .

[10]  Charles Allen Bonsall.  The NUSAT I project-government, industry and academia learning together (aerospace education) , 1991 .

[11]  Christopher Kitts,et al.  Beacon Monitoring: Reducing the Cost of Nominal Spacecraft Operations , 1998 .

[12]  B. Escudier,et al.  The french educational satellite arsene , 1985 .

[13]  Michael Swartwout,et al.  AUTOMATED HEALTH OPERATIONS FOR THE SAPPHIRE SPACECRAFT , 1997 .

[14]  Dan Keun Sung,et al.  Analysis of anomalous TDE data on-board the KITSAT-1 , 1999 .

[15]  Albert D. Helfrick.  Educating the Avionics Professional in the 21st Century , 2004, J. Aerosp. Comput. Inf. Commun..

[16]  Robert J. Twiggs,et al.  WEBERSAT: a low-cost imaging satellite , 1991, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[17]  Paolo Tortora.  A GPS based attitude determination algorithm for the spin-stabilized microsatellite UNISAT , 2000 .

[18]  G. Hunyadi,et al.  The University Nanosat Program: an adaptable, responsive and realistic capability demonstration vehicle , 2004, 2004 IEEE Aerospace Conference Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.04TH8720).

[19]  J. L. Smith.  Attitude determination and control suitable for micro-spacecraft , 2000, 2000 IEEE Aerospace Conference. Proceedings (Cat. No.00TH8484).

[20]  Christopher Kitts,et al.  The Omni-Directional Differential Sun Sensor , 1995 .

[21]  Christopher Kitts,et al.  Design and performance testing of a satellite health beacon receiving station , 1999, 1999 IEEE Aerospace Conference. Proceedings (Cat. No.99TH8403).

[22]  Michael A. Swartwout,et al.  Integrating Hands-On Design Education and Faculty Research at Washington University , 2004 .

[23]  Carolyn Reeder,et al.  Shades of Gray , 1989 .

[24]  Billy Smith,et al.  The Spacecraft Design/Flight Experience At The Undergraduate Level , 2002 .

[25]  Lev M. Zelenyi,et al.  Aerospace education program realization by means of the micro-satellite , 2005 .

[26]  Helen L. Reed,et al.  Arizona State University Satellite 1 (ASUSat1): Low-Cost, Student-Designed Nanosatellite , 2002 .

[27]  C. Kitts,et al.  Anomaly detection using the emerald nanosatellite on board expert system , 2004, 2004 IEEE Aerospace Conference Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.04TH8720).

[28]  Michele Grassi.  Performance Evaluation of the UNISAT Attitude Control System , 1997 .

[29]  R. Sherwood,et al.  Lessons from implementation of beacon spacecraft operations on Deep Space One , 2000, 2000 IEEE Aerospace Conference. Proceedings (Cat. No.00TH8484).

[30]  Sheldon I. Green.  Aircraft Design Education through Student Competitions , 1996 .

[31]  J. Puig-Suari,et al.  Development of the standard CubeSat deployer and a CubeSat class PicoSatellite , 2001, 2001 IEEE Aerospace Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.01TH8542).

[32]  Jordi Puig-Suari,et al.  CubeSat developments at Cal Poly: the standard deployer and PolySat , 2000, SPIE Optics + Photonics.

[33]  Penina Axelrad,et al.  Student Nitric Oxide Explorer , 1996, Optics & Photonics.

[34]  Brian E. Gilchrist,et al.  The Icarus student satellite project , 2005 .

[35]  Sun Zhaowei,et al.  The combined control algorithm for large-angle maneuver of HITSAT-1 small satellite , 2004 .

[36]  Helen L. Reed,et al.  Asusat 1: An example of low-cost nanosatellite development , 1996 .