The Social and Transfer Massive Open Online Course: Post-Digital Learning

This research provides a current view on post-digital learning experiences with a massive open online course (MOOC), in relation to user profiles, universal instructional design, digital resources, inclusive activities and collaborative assessment. The study is based on a mixed research methodology, creating a questionnaire aimed at people with experience in any MOOC typology, in which the learning methodology, the instructional didactic design of the MOOCs, the resources, proposed activities, and accessibility are analyzed. Additionally, interviews and focus groups were carried out with the creators of massive open online social courses alongside the students of the official Master of Communication and Education on the Internet, offered by the UNED (Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia—Spain), with the subject of virtual participation scenarios. The data obtained are subjected to statistical tests to determine the scientific rigor, such as Cronbach’s alpha, the Kolmogorov-Smirnov normality test, and the non-parametric tests of Spearman’s correlation coefficient and Kendall’s Tau b. In conclusion, the social massive open online course/transfer massive open online course model is evidenced as a projected approach in social networks. The sMOOC and tMOOC are online training models, which are in constant development and evolution, as a social, creative, collaborative, interactive, and inclusive learning methodology, offering new challenges for the digital distance education of the future. The research carried out is only related and linked to the experiences of different people with the sMOOC and tMOOC.

[1]  J. Lozada Investigación Aplicada: Definición, Propiedad Intelectual e Industria , 2014 .

[2]  Laura Cervi,et al.  The Challenge of Teaching Mobile Journalism through MOOCs: A Case Study , 2020, Sustainability.

[3]  Teaching International Relations through the Format of a Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) , 2019 .

[4]  Antonio Matas Diseño del formato de escalas tipo Likert: un estado de la cuestión , 2018 .

[5]  Carmen Marta-Lazo,et al.  De sMOOC a tMOOC, el aprendizaje hacia la transferencia profesional: El proyecto europeo ECO , 2018 .

[6]  S. Osuna-Acedo,et al.  sMOOC, Un Nuevo Modelo De Formación En El Aprendizaje Del Segundo Idioma. Estudio De Caso , 2020 .

[7]  Marina Lepp,et al.  Are Highly Motivated Learners More Likely to Complete a Computer Programming MOOC? , 2021 .

[8]  María-del-Mar Sánchez-Vera,et al.  Más allá de las pruebas objetivas y la evaluación por pares: alternativas de evaluación en los MOOC , 2015 .

[9]  E. López-Meneses,et al.  Competencias digitales en docentes de Educación Superior , 2018, Revista Digital de Investigación en Docencia Universitaria.

[10]  Nazira Calleja,et al.  Efecto del número de opciones de respuesta en las propiedades psicométricas de cuatro escalas psicosociales , 2019 .

[11]  José Luis Salmerón Silvera,et al.  EDUTOOL ® : UN INSTRUMENTO PARA LA EVALUACIÓN Y ACREDITACIÓN DE LA CALIDAD DE LOS MOOCS , 2015 .

[12]  I. Roque,et al.  METODOLOGÍA DE LA INVESTIGACIÓN , 2019, Cultura de emprendimiento corporativo en las micro, pequeñas y medianas empresas colombianas.

[13]  Javier Gil-Quintana,et al.  Citizenship Training through sMOOCs: A Participative and Intercreative Learning , 2020, Sustainability.

[14]  Steven D. Scott The Postdigital Membrane: Imagination,Technology and Desire (2000) by Robert Pepperell and MichaelPunt , 2005 .

[15]  P. Jandrić Postdigital Research Measurement , 2020, Postdigital Science and Education.

[16]  Sergio Canazza,et al.  How to play a MOOC: Practices and simulation , 2021, Entertain. Comput..

[17]  Min Liu,et al.  Exploring the relationship between social presence and learners' prestige in MOOC discussion forums using automated content analysis and social network analysis , 2021, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[18]  Juha Suoranta,et al.  Postdigital science and education , 2018 .

[19]  Alfonso Bustos Sánchez,et al.  Las comunidades virtuales de aprendizaje , 2008 .

[20]  Jesus G. Boticario,et al.  Accesibilidad y MOOC: Hacia una perspectiva integral , 2015 .

[21]  Silvia Sanz-Santamaría,et al.  Comparativa técnica y prospectiva de las principales plataformas MOOC de código abierto Comparative Technical Analysis and Prospective of the Major Open Source MOOC Platforms , 2014 .

[22]  Maria Antonietta Impedovo,et al.  The moderating effect of social capital on co-regulated learning for MOOC achievement , 2020, Education and Information Technologies.

[23]  Joaquín Gairín Sallán Virtual communities of learning , 2006 .

[24]  Alejandro Alvarado Iniesta,et al.  Coeficiente alfa de Cronbach para medir la fiabilidad de un cuestionario difuso , 2016 .