Personal contact, individuation, and the better-than-average effect.

Research in which people compare themselves with an average peer has consistently shown that people evaluate themselves more favorably than they evaluate others. Seven studies were conducted to demonstrate that the magnitude of this better-than-average effect depends on the level of abstraction in the comparison. These studies showed that people were less biased when they compared themselves with an individuated target than when they compared themselves with a nonindividuated target, namely, the average college student. The better-than-average effect was reduced more when the observer had personal contact with the comparison target than when no personal contact was established. Differences in the magnitude of the better-than-average effect could not be attributed to the contemporaneous nature of the target's presentation, communication from the target, perceptual vividness, implied evaluation, or perceptions of similarity

[1]  P. Ekman.  Telling lies: clues to deceit in the marketplace , 1985 .

[2]  J. V. Wood,et al.  Social comparison in adjustment to breast cancer. , 1985, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[3]  M. L. Klotz,et al.  Judgments of Physical Attractiveness , 1986 .

[4]  Neil D. Weinstein,et al.  Egocentrism as a Source of Unrealistic Optimism , 1982 .

[5]  Neil D. Weinstein,et al.  Reducing unrealistic optimism about illness susceptibility. , 1983 .

[6]  R. Zajonc.  Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. , 1968 .

[7]  Jonathon D. Brown,et al.  Evaluations of Self and Others: Self-Enhancement Biases in Social Judgments , 1986 .

[8]  G. Lassiter,et al.  The Potential for Bias in Videotaped Confessions1 , 1992 .

[9]  R. Fisher.  Preventing nuclear war , 1981 .

[10]  David M. Messick,et al.  Why We Are Fairer Than Others , 1985 .

[11]  Dale T. Miller,et al.  Self-serving biases in the attribution of causality: Fact or fiction? , 1975 .

[12]  A. Mehrabian,et al.  Decoding of inconsistent communications. , 1967, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[13]  A. D. Jones,et al.  Obedience to Authority , 1974 .

[14]  S Milgram,et al.  Some Conditions of Obedience and Disobedience to Authority , 1965 .

[15]  Arie W. Kruglanski,et al.  Motivations for judging and knowing: Implications for causal attribution. , 1990 .

[16]  N. Weinstein.  Unrealistic optimism about future life events , 1980 .

[17]  Garrison Keillor,et al.  Lake Wobegon Days , 1985 .

[18]  N D Weinstein,et al.  Why it won't happen to me: perceptions of risk factors and susceptibility. , 1984, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[19]  P. Ekman,et al.  What you say and how you say it: the contribution of speech content and voice quality to judgments of others. , 1985, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[20]  A. Greenwald.  The totalitarian ego: Fabrication and revision of personal history. , 1980 .

[21]  D. Dunning,et al.  Ambiguity and self-evaluation: the role of idiosyncratic trait definitions in self-serving assessments of ability , 1989 .

[22]  L. Festinger.  A Theory of Social Comparison Processes , 1954 .

[23]  T. Wills.  Downward Comparison Principles in Social Psychology , 1981 .

[24]  David M. Messick,et al.  On Being Better but not Smarter than Others: The Muhammad Ali Effect , 1989 .

[25]  N. B. Cottrell,et al.  Social facilitation of dominant responses by the presence of an audicence and the mere presence of others. , 1968, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[26]  J. V. Wood,et al.  It Could Be Worse: Selective Evaluation as a Response to Victimization , 1983 .

[27]  S. E. Taylor,et al.  Social comparison activity under threat: downward evaluation and upward contacts. , 1989, Psychological review.

[28]  M. Zuckerman,et al.  Attribution of success and failure revisited, or: The motivational bias is alive and well in attribution theory , 1979 .

[29]  L. Perloff,et al.  Self–other judgments and perceived vulnerability to victimization. , 1986 .

[30]  K. L. Hakmiller,et al.  Threat as a determinant of downward comparison , 1966 .

[31]  G. W. Bradley.  Self-serving biases in the attribution process: A reexamination of the fact or fiction question. , 1978 .

[32]  M. Alicke.  Global self-evaluation as determined by the desirability and controllability of trait adjectives. , 1985 .

[33]  J. Crocker,et al.  Depression, social comparison, and the false-consensus effect. , 1983, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[34]  B. R. Schlenker,et al.  Self-Identification: Toward an Integration of the Private and Public Self , 1986 .

[35]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Insensitivity to sample bias: Generalizing from atypical cases , 1980 .