Effect of carotid plaque screening using contrast-enhanced ultrasound on cardiovascular risk stratification.

Cardiovascular risk stratification of asymptomatic patients is based on the assessment of risk factors. Noninvasive imaging of subclinical atherosclerosis may improve cardiovascular risk stratification, especially in patients with co-morbidities. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) of the carotid arteries on cardiovascular risk assessment. The study population consisted of 100 consecutive asymptomatic patients with ≥1 clinical risk factor for atherosclerosis. Cardiovascular risk was estimated by calculating the Prospective Cardiovascular Münster Heart Study (PROCAM) risk score. This score was divided into 3 subgroups: low (≤5%), intermediate (6% to 19%), and high (≥20%). Subclinical carotid atherosclerosis was assessed using standard ultrasound for intima-media thickness and plaque screening and CEUS for additional plaque screening. CEUS was performed using SonoVue contrast agent. Patients with subclinical atherosclerosis were considered to be at high cardiovascular risk. McNemar's test was used to compare PROCAM score to ultrasound findings. The mean PROCAM risk score was 9 ± 10; the PROCAM risk score was low in 72 patients (72%), intermediate in 17 patients (17%), and high in 11 patients (11%). A total of 21 patients (21%) had abnormal carotid intima-media thickness, 77% had plaques on conventional carotid ultrasound, and 88% had plaques on standard carotid ultrasound combined with CEUS. Detection of atherosclerosis led to the reclassification of 79 patients (79%) to high cardiovascular risk (p <0.001). In conclusion, CEUS changes the risk category as estimated by a traditional risk stratification model in most asymptomatic patients. CEUS may thus be an additional method for cardiovascular risk prediction in patient groups with co-morbidities.

[1]  Mario J. Garcia,et al.  Erratum: Carotid plaque burden as a measure of subclinical atherosclerosis: Comparison with other tests for subclinical arterial disease in the high risk plaque bioimage study. (JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging (2012) 5 (681-9)) , 2013 .

[2]  P. Shah,et al.  VIEWPOINT AND COMMENTARY Viewpoint Screening Asymptomatic Subjects for Subclinical Atherosclerosis Can We, Does It Matter, and Should We? , 2022 .

[3]  Robert F Mattrey,et al.  Carotid arteries: contrast-enhanced US angiography--preliminary clinical experience. , 2004, Radiology.

[4]  D. Mozaffarian,et al.  Executive summary: heart disease and stroke statistics--2010 update: a report from the American Heart Association. , 2010, Circulation.

[5]  Joseph Lau,et al.  The Vulnerable Atherosclerotic Plaque: Scope of the Literature , 2010, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[6]  S. Bergmann,et al.  Carotid plaque, compared with carotid intima-media thickness, more accurately predicts coronary artery disease events: a meta-analysis. , 2011, Atherosclerosis.

[7]  Stefan Störk,et al.  Carotid Artery Plaque Burden, Stiffness, and Mortality Risk in Elderly Men: A Prospective, Population-Based Cohort Study , 2004, Circulation.

[8]  Shah Ebrahim,et al.  European Guidelines on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (Version 2012) , 2012, International Journal of Behavioral Medicine.

[9]  Matthias W. Lorenz,et al.  Prediction of Clinical Cardiovascular Events With Carotid Intima-Media Thickness: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2007, Circulation.

[10]  A. Nicolaides,et al.  Carotid and femoral ultrasound morphology screening and cardiovascular events in low risk subjects: a 10-year follow-up study (the CAFES-CAVE study) , 2001 .

[11]  D. Staub,et al.  Did you measure the intima-media thickness? , 2009, Ultraschall in der Medizin.

[12]  E. Vicaut,et al.  Mannheim Carotid Intima-Media Thickness Consensus (2004–2006) , 2006, Cerebrovascular Diseases.

[13]  Ian Graham,et al.  ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: the Task Force for the management of dyslipidaemias of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS). , 2011, Atherosclerosis.

[14]  Nico de Jong,et al.  Far-wall pseudoenhancement during contrast-enhanced ultrasound of the carotid arteries: clinical description and in vitro reproduction. , 2012, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[15]  Erling Falk,et al.  Carotid plaque burden as a measure of subclinical atherosclerosis: comparison with other tests for subclinical arterial disease in the High Risk Plaque BioImage study. , 2012, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[16]  D. Mozaffarian,et al.  Heart disease and stroke statistics--2010 update: a report from the American Heart Association. , 2010, Circulation.

[17]  Christopher B. Kendall,et al.  Use of carotid ultrasound to identify subclinical vascular disease and evaluate cardiovascular disease risk: a consensus statement from the American Society of Echocardiography Carotid Intima-Media Thickness Task Force. Endorsed by the Society for Vascular Medicine. , 2008, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[18]  Eric Boerwinkle,et al.  Carotid intima-media thickness and presence or absence of plaque improves prediction of coronary heart disease risk: the ARIC (Atherosclerosis Risk In Communities) study. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[19]  G. Assmann,et al.  Simple Scoring Scheme for Calculating the Risk of Acute Coronary Events Based on the 10-Year Follow-Up of the Prospective Cardiovascular Münster (PROCAM) Study , 2002, Circulation.

[20]  Nico de Jong,et al.  Assessment of subclinical atherosclerosis using contrast-enhanced ultrasound. , 2013, European heart journal cardiovascular Imaging.

[21]  N Bom,et al.  An in vitro evaluation of the line pattern of the near and far walls of carotid arteries using B-mode ultrasound. , 1996, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[22]  M. Huisman,et al.  Accuracy of carotid plaque detection and intima-media thickness measurement with ultrasonography in routine clinical practice. , 2010, European journal of internal medicine.

[23]  P. Kolh,et al.  ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: the Task Force for the management of dyslipidaemias of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS). , 2011, European heart journal.

[24]  C. Sirlin,et al.  Contrast-enhanced B-mode US angiography in the assessment of experimental in vivo and in vitro atherosclerotic disease. , 2001, Academic radiology.