Three-dimensional dual-phase whole-heart MR imaging: clinical implications for congenital heart disease.

PURPOSE To identify which rest phase (systolic or diastolic) is optimum for assessing or measuring cardiac structures in the setting of three-dimensional (3D) whole-heart imaging in congenital heart disease (CHD). MATERIALS AND METHODS The study was approved by the institutional review board; informed consent was obtained. Fifty children (26 male and 24 female patients) underwent 3D dual-phase whole-heart imaging. Cardiac structures were analyzed for contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and image quality. Cross-sectional measurements were taken of the aortic arch, right ventricular (RV) outflow tract (RVOT) and pulmonary arteries. Normally distributed variables were compared by using paired t tests, and categorical data were compared by using Wilcoxon signed-rank test. RESULTS Mean CNR and image quality were significantly (all P < .05) greater in systole for the right atrium (CNR, 8.9 vs 7.5; image quality, 438 vs 91), left atrium (CNR, 8.0 vs 5.3; image quality, 1006 vs 29), RV (CNR, 10.6 vs 8.2; image quality, 131 vs 23), LV (CNR, 9.4 vs 7.7; image quality, 125 vs 28), and pulmonary veins (CNR, 6.2 vs 4.9; image quality, 914 vs 32). Conversely, diastolic CNR was significantly higher in the aorta (9.2 vs 8.2; P = .013) and diastolic image quality was higher for the left pulmonary artery (238 vs 62; P = .007), right pulmonary artery (219 vs 35; P < .001), and for imaging of an area after an arterial stenosis (164 vs 7; P < .001). All aortic arch and RVOT cross-sectional measurements were significantly (P < .05) greater in systole (narrowest point of arch, 70 vs 53 mm(2); descending aorta, 71 vs 58 mm(2); transverse arch, 293 vs 275 mm(2); valvar RVOT, 291 vs 268 mm(2); supravalvar RVOT, 337 vs 280 mm(2); prebifurcation RVOT, 329 vs 259 mm(2)). CONCLUSION Certain structures in CHD are better imaged in systole and others in diastole, and therefore, the dual-phase approach allows a higher overall success rate. This approach also allows depiction of diameter changes between systole and diastole and is therefore preferable to standard single-phase sequences for the planning of interventional procedures.

[1]  M. McConnell,et al.  Comparison of respiratory suppression methods and navigator locations for MR coronary angiography. , 1997, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[2]  P. Börnert,et al.  Free‐breathing whole‐heart coronary MRA with 3D radial SSFP and self‐navigated image reconstruction , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[3]  Reza Razavi,et al.  Volumetric cardiac quantification by using 3D dual-phase whole-heart MR imaging. , 2008, Radiology.

[4]  René M. Botnar,et al.  Detection of coronary artery anomalies in infants and young children with congenital heart disease by using MR imaging. , 2011, Radiology.

[5]  Samir Sarikouch,et al.  Coronary anomalies assessed by whole‐heart isotropic 3D magnetic resonance imaging for cardiac morphology in congenital heart disease , 2009, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[6]  T. Krasemann,et al.  Planning of catheter interventions for pulmonary artery stenosis: Improved measurement agreement with magnetic resonance angiography using identical angulations , 2011, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[7]  T Schaeffter,et al.  Whole‐heart imaging using undersampled radial phase encoding (RPE) and iterative sensitivity encoding (SENSE) reconstruction , 2009, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[8]  L. Mitsumori,et al.  Measuring aortic diameter with different MR techniques: Comparison of three‐dimensional (3D) navigated steady‐state free‐precession (SSFP), 3D contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE‐MRA), 2D T2 black blood, and 2D cine SSFP , 2010, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[9]  Silvia Schievano,et al.  Four-dimensional computed tomography: a method of assessing right ventricular outflow tract and pulmonary artery deformations throughout the cardiac cycle , 2010, European Radiology.

[10]  René M. Botnar,et al.  Direct comparison of 3D spiral vs. Cartesian gradient‐echo coronary magnetic resonance angiography , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[11]  René M. Botnar,et al.  Congenital heart disease in children: coronary MR angiography during systole and diastole with dual cardiac phase whole-heart imaging. , 2011, Radiology.

[12]  Tal Geva,et al.  Gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography of pulmonary and systemic venous anomalies. , 2002, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[13]  F. Epstein,et al.  Visualization of aortic valve leaflets using black blood MRI , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[14]  René M. Botnar,et al.  Congenital heart disease: cardiovascular MR imaging by using an intravascular blood pool contrast agent. , 2011, Radiology.