Effects of formulation on spray nozzle performance for applications from ground-based boom sprayers

Abstract The performance of agricultural spray nozzles has components relating to the droplet size and velocity distributions within the spray, spray structure, entrained air characteristics and the spray volume distribution pattern. The interaction of these physical performance parameters has been shown to influence target retention, efficacy and the risk of drift. Results from a number of studies have also shown that the physical properties of the spray liquid have a substantial effect on spray formation such that changes in formulation type can give changes in spray characteristics that would be equivalent to doubling the flow rate through conventional hydraulic flat fan nozzles. The interactions between the physical properties of the spray liquid and the characteristics of the spray formed is a function of nozzle design. However, analysis of a large data set for a range of types of hydraulic pressure nozzle has shown that sprays formed from liquids based on emulsions generally have a coarser droplet size distribution compared with sprays formed from surfactant solutions. Although some correlation between dynamic surface tension and viscosity with spray droplet size has been established, the results from work reviewed in this paper suggest that other factors also influence the spray formation process. Air induction and twin-fluid nozzles mix air and liquid in the spray formulation process to produce droplets with air inclusions. These nozzle designs have been found to have a performance that is more sensitive to changes in spray liquid properties compared with hydraulic pressure nozzles and to exhibit trends that are different from those of conventional nozzle types.

[1]  N. Dombrowski,et al.  Some aspects of liquid flow through fan spray nozzles , 1960 .

[2]  C. R. Tuck,et al.  How adjuvants influence spray formation with different hydraulic nozzles , 1999 .

[3]  F. Hall,et al.  Effects of spray adjuvants on swath patterns and droplet spectra for a flat-fan hydraulic nozzle , 1993 .

[4]  N. Dombrowski,et al.  A photographic investigation into the disintegration of liquid sheets , 1954, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[5]  R. E. Ford,et al.  The formation of drops from viscous water-in-oil emulsions sprayed through fan-jet nozzles , 1967 .

[6]  C. Tuck,et al.  DILUTE EMULSIONS AND THEIR EFFECT ON THE BREAKUP OF THE LIQUID SHEET PRODUCED BY FLAT-FAN SPRAY NOZZLES , 1999 .

[7]  Nb Akesson,et al.  Pesticide drop size as a function of spray atomizers and liquid formulations. , 1990 .

[8]  Effect of formulation and nozzle type on droplet size with isopropylamine and trimesium salts of glyphosate , 1997 .

[9]  L. F. Bouse,et al.  EFFECT OF SPRAY MIXTURE ON DROPLET SIZE , 1990 .

[10]  A. Hewitt,et al.  Relative drift potential and droplet size spectra of aerially applied Propanil formulations , 1997 .

[11]  Graham Matthews,et al.  Application of Pesticides to Crops , 1999 .

[12]  J. Combellack,et al.  A comparison of the drift potential of a novel twin fluid nozzle with conventional low volume flat fan nozzles when using a range of adjuvants , 1996 .

[13]  A. Hewitt,et al.  Spray drift: impact of requirements to protect the environment. , 2000 .

[14]  C. R. Glass,et al.  The variation in characteristics of air-included sprays with adjuvants. , 2000 .

[15]  J. Kennedy,et al.  Liquid Particle Size Measurement Techniques , 1984 .

[16]  Peter Hobson,et al.  Spray Drift from Hydraulic Spray Nozzles: the Use of a Computer Simulation Model to Examine Factors Influencing Drift , 1993 .

[17]  Franklin R. Hall,et al.  Droplet Spectra for Some Agricultural Fan Nozzles, with Respect to Drift and Biological Efficiency , 1990 .

[18]  C. R. Tuck,et al.  The effect of some adjuvants on sprays produced by agricultural flat fan nozzles , 1997 .

[19]  G. Matthews,et al.  Application Technology for Crop Protection , 1993 .

[20]  C. Tuck,et al.  Techniques for measurement of droplet size and velocity distributions in agricultural sprays , 1997 .

[21]  Air induction nozzles : a solution to spray drift? , 1999 .

[22]  N. Akesson,et al.  Spray atomization characteristics as a function of pesticide formulations and atomizer design , 1994 .