Preceding movement effects on sequential aiming

In this study, two experiments were devised to examine the control strategy used by individuals when performing sequential aiming movements. Of particular interest was the aiming behavior displayed when task difficulty was changed midway through a sequence of movements. In Experiment 1, target size was manipulated, as the targets were made either larger or smaller, between the 8th and 12th movement of the sequence. In Experiment 2, the amplitude between the two targets was similarly changed while the target size remained constant. Results revealed that in Experiment 1, individuals took two movements following the perturbation to target size, to re-tune their movement times in order to correspond with the new task difficulty. Conversely for Experiment 2, movement time changed immediately and in correspondence with the new target amplitude. These findings demonstrate that participants can use information from the preceding movement to prepare and guide subsequent movements—but only when target size is changed. When response amplitude changes mid-sequence, it seems individuals rely more on immediate, target-derived information. Therefore, counter to some current accounts of visual movement control, it appears that memory representations of the preceding movement can guide subsequent movements; however, this information appears selectively accessed in a context-dependent fashion.

[1]  Luc Tremblay,et al.  Randomizing visual feedback in manual aiming: reminiscence of the previous trial condition and prior knowledge of feedback availability , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[2]  D. Elliott,et al.  The Influence of Premovement Visual Information on Manual Aiming , 1987, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[3]  S. Glover,et al.  Separate visual representations in the planning and control of action , 2004, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[4]  H. Zelaznik,et al.  Motor-output variability: a theory for the accuracy of rapid motor acts. , 1979, Psychological review.

[5]  Steven A. Jax,et al.  Hand path priming in manual obstacle avoidance: evidence for abstract spatiotemporal forms in human motor control. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[6]  Romeo Chua,et al.  On-line control of rapid aiming movements: Unexpected target perturbations and movement kinematics. , 1998 .

[7]  Katsumi Aoki,et al.  Recent development of flow visualization , 2004, J. Vis..

[8]  P J Beek,et al.  Basketball jump shooting is controlled online by vision. , 2007, Experimental psychology.

[9]  Les G. Carlton,et al.  Chapter 1 Visual Processing Time and the Control of Movement , 1992 .

[10]  D. Knill,et al.  The role of memory in visually guided reaching. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[11]  P. Fitts The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.

[12]  R. Chua,et al.  Decay in Visuomotor Representations During Manual Aiming , 2006, Journal of motor behavior.

[13]  Digby Elliott,et al.  Vision and motor control , 1992 .

[14]  William H Warren,et al.  Kinematic adaptation to sudden changes in visual task constraints during reciprocal aiming. , 2006, Human movement science.

[15]  J. Rothwell Principles of Neural Science , 1982 .

[16]  M. Goodale,et al.  The visual brain in action , 1995 .

[17]  M. Goodale,et al.  Two visual systems re-viewed , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[18]  D. Rosenbaum,et al.  Hand path priming in manual obstacle avoidance: Rapid decay of dorsal stream information , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[19]  Konrad Paul Kording,et al.  Review TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences Vol.10 No.7 July 2006 Special Issue: Probabilistic models of cognition Bayesian decision theory in sensorimotor control , 2022 .

[20]  Digby Elliott,et al.  Vision and Goal-Directed Movement: Neurobehavioral Perspectives , 2010 .

[21]  M. Goodale,et al.  Perceptual illusion and the real-time control of action. , 2003, Spatial vision.

[22]  D. Westwood,et al.  No Evidence for Accurate Visuomotor Memory: Systematic and Variable Error in Memory-Guided Reaching , 2003, Journal of motor behavior.