Determination of Optimal Configuration for Mega Bracing Systems in Steel Frames using Genetic Algorithm

Mega bracing is one of the recently emphasized methods for lateral bracing of structures. In the present study, various configurations of mega bracing systems in terms of installation angle for lateral bracing of steel structures are evaluated and optimized. The investigated frames are designed and optimized using genetic algorithm (GA) according to LRFD-AISC (load and resistance factor design, american institute of steel construction). Frame analysis is carried out by means of finite element method, while optimization is conducted using GA considering three different types of selection and crossover, simultaneously. The results demonstrate that the optimum angle of mega bracing in steel frames is within the range of 36° to 42° with regard to the frame height and span. Furthermore, with increase in frame height, the employment of optimally distributed mega braces along the height of the frame results in reduction of story drifts and also the frame weight. Additionally, simultaneous utilization of various selection and crossover types in GA optimization leads to an increase in convergence rate of optimum weight of the frame as well as reduction in the required computations.

[1]  Kristina Shea,et al.  Structural Topology Optimization of Braced Steel Frameworks Using Genetic Programming , 2006, EG-ICE.

[2]  Ramazan Ozcelik,et al.  The development of the buckling restrained braces with new end restrains , 2017 .

[3]  Arsalan Alavi,et al.  Minimum‐weight design of high‐rise structures subjected to flexural vibration at a desired natural frequency , 2018, The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings.

[4]  Kapil Khandelwal,et al.  Comparison of robustness of metaheuristic algorithms for steel frame optimization , 2015 .

[5]  Kyoung Sun Moon,et al.  Stiffness-based design methodology for steel braced tube structures: A sustainable approach , 2010 .

[6]  Dia Eddin Nassani,et al.  Comparative Response Assessment of Steel Frames With Different Bracing Systems Under Seismic Effect , 2017 .

[7]  Yong Xia,et al.  A tribe competition-based genetic algorithm for feature selection in pattern classification , 2017, Appl. Soft Comput..

[8]  H. Emre Ilgin,et al.  A proposal for the classification of structural systems of tall buildings , 2007 .

[9]  Kheir Al-Kodmany,et al.  An Overview of Structural and Aesthetic Developments in Tall Buildings Using Exterior Bracing and Diagrid Systems , 2016 .

[10]  Reza Rahgozar,et al.  Determination of optimum location for flexible outrigger systems in tall buildings with constant cross section consisting of framed tube, shear core, belt truss and outrigger system using energy method , 2017 .

[11]  Iman Hajirasouliha,et al.  Optimum seismic design of concentrically braced steel frames: concepts and design procedures , 2005 .

[12]  Tomasz Arciszewski,et al.  Evolutionary Design of Steel Structures in Tall Buildings , 2005 .

[13]  Kazem Abhary,et al.  An innovative framework for designing genetic algorithm structures , 2017, Expert Syst. Appl..

[14]  Kyoung Sun Moon,et al.  Advances in Structural Systems for Tall Buildings: Emerging Developments for Contemporary Urban Giants , 2018, Buildings.

[15]  Siamak Talatahari,et al.  An improved ant colony optimization for the design of planar steel frames , 2010 .

[16]  Dhanaraj M. Patil,et al.  Seismic Behaviour of Outrigger Braced Systems in High Rise 2-D Steel Buildings , 2016 .

[17]  Roberto Nascimbene,et al.  Seismic analysis of high-rise mega-braced frame-core buildings , 2016 .

[18]  P. Victer Paul,et al.  Performance analyses over population seeding techniques of the permutation-coded genetic algorithm: An empirical study based on traveling salesman problems , 2015, Appl. Soft Comput..

[19]  Lee Luong,et al.  Optimization/simulation modelling of the integrated production-distribution plan: an innovative survey , 2008 .

[20]  null null,et al.  Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Buildings and Other Structures , 2017 .

[21]  Andres Tovar,et al.  Outrigger placement in tall buildings using topology optimization , 2014 .

[22]  A. R. Ahmadi,et al.  Parametric stress distribution and displacement functions for tall buildings under lateral loads , 2014 .

[23]  Cem Topkaya,et al.  A review of research on steel eccentrically braced frames , 2017 .

[24]  David E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic Algorithms in Search Optimization and Machine Learning , 1988 .

[25]  Zhan Wang,et al.  Topology Optimization of Bracing Systems for Multistory Steel Frames under Earthquake Loads , 2011 .

[26]  Kheir Al-Kodmany,et al.  Sustainability and the 21st Century Vertical City: A Review of Design Approaches of Tall Buildings , 2018, Buildings.

[27]  Yi Min Xie,et al.  Optimal Topology Design of Bracing Systems for Multistory Steel Frames , 2000 .

[28]  Jung-Fa Tsai,et al.  Finding multiple optimal solutions of signomial discrete programming problems with free variables , 2011 .

[29]  Junchi Yan,et al.  Two-stage based ensemble optimization framework for large-scale global optimization , 2013, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[30]  S. O. Degertekin.  Optimum design of steel frames using harmony search algorithm , 2008 .

[31]  Zheng Lu,et al.  A review of the diagrid structural system for tall buildings , 2018 .

[32]  Mahmoud Faytarouni,et al.  Seismic performance of concentrically braced frames with and without brace buckling , 2017 .

[33]  John H. Holland,et al.  Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence , 1992 .

[34]  Barron J. Bichon,et al.  Design of Steel Frames Using Ant Colony Optimization , 2005 .

[35]  Ali Kheyroddin,et al.  Effect of Span Length on Behavior of MRF Accompanied with CBF and MBF Systems , 2017 .

[36]  Shahram Pezeshk,et al.  Design of Nonlinear Framed Structures Using Genetic Optimization , 2000 .

[38]  Amr S. Elnashai,et al.  Bracing systems for seismic retrofitting of steel frames , 2009 .

[39]  Liang Gao,et al.  Backtracking Search Algorithm with three constraint handling methods for constrained optimization problems , 2015, Expert Syst. Appl..

[40]  Mehdi Jalalpour,et al.  Topology optimization of steel frame structures with constraints on overall and individual member instabilities , 2018 .

[41]  Reza Rahgozar,et al.  Dynamic analysis of combined system of framed tube and shear walls by Galerkin method using B‐spline functions , 2015 .

[42]  O. Hasançebi,et al.  Comparison of non-deterministic search techniques in the optimum design of real size steel frames , 2010 .

[43]  Ali Kaveh,et al.  Advances in Metaheuristic Algorithms for Optimal Design of Structures , 2014 .

[44]  Xiaoye Yu,et al.  Relationships between internal forces, bracing patterns and lateral stiffnesses of a simple frame , 2015 .

[45]  Kazem Abhary,et al.  An improved structure of genetic algorithms for global optimisation , 2016, Progress in Artificial Intelligence.

[46]  Ali M. Memari,et al.  Optimal design of steel frames subject to gravity and seismic codes' prescribed lateral forces , 1999 .

[47]  Kyoung Sun Moon,et al.  Structural Developments in Tall Buildings: Current Trends and Future Prospects , 2007 .

[48]  Mehmet Polat Saka,et al.  Optimum Design of Steel Frames using Stochastic Search Techniques Based on Natural Phenomena: A Review , 2007 .